| Literature DB >> 29930312 |
Kazuya Kobayashi1, Yuki Ichihara1, Nobuko Tano1, Laura Fields1, Nilaani Murugesu1, Tomoya Ito1, Chiho Ikebe1, Fiona Lewis1, Kenta Yashiro1, Yasunori Shintani1, Rakesh Uppal1, Ken Suzuki2.
Abstract
Transplantation of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is a promising new therapy for heart failure. However, the current cell delivery routes result in poor donor cell engraftment. We therefore explored the role of fibrin glue (FG)-aided, instant epicardial placement to enhance the efficacy of MSC-based therapy in a rat ischemic cardiomyopathy model. We identified a feasible and reproducible method to instantly produce a FG-MSC complex directly on the heart surface. This complex exhibited prompt, firm adhesion to the heart, markedly improving initial retention of donor MSCs compared to intramyocardial injection. In addition, maintenance of retained MSCs was enhanced using this method, together contributing the increased donor cell presence. Such increased donor cell quantity using the FG-aided technique led to further improved cardiac function in association with augmented histological myocardial repair, which correlated with upregulation of tissue repair-related genes. We identified that the epicardial layer was eliminated shortly after FG-aided epicardial placement of MSCs, facilitating permeation of the donor MSC's secretome into the myocardium enabling myocardial repair. These data indicate that FG-aided, on-site, instant epicardial placement enhances MSC engraftment, promoting the efficacy of MSC-based therapy for heart failure. Further development of this accessible, advanced MSC-therapy is justified.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29930312 PMCID: PMC6013428 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27881-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Improved initial retention and survival of MSCs transplanted using FG-aided, instant epicardial placement. (a) Four weeks after coronary artery ligation, female rats were transplanted with male MSCs using FG-aided, instant epicardial placement (FG-MSC group) or intramyocardial injection (IM-MSC group). Quantitative PCR for the male specific Sry gene detected increased retention of donor cells (shown as % of the total cell number transplanted) in the FG-MSC group compared to the IM-MSC group. †p < 0.05 vs. the corresponding time point value of the IM-MSC group, n = 5 or 6 in each point. (b) % loss of retained MSCs between day 3 and 7 (left panel) and between day 7 and 28 (right panel) were calculated from the data shown in Fig. 1a. (c) Immunofluorescence analysis demonstrated that transplanted MSCs (CM-DiI-labeled) in the FG-MSC group persistently retained at the surface of the heart. Representative images from 5 or 6 hearts at each time point are presented. Scale bars = 1 mm. cTnT, cardiac troponin T. (d) High-magnification observations of the FG-MSC complex demonstrated gradual elimination of FG, which was detectable with the green auto-fluorescence between CM-DiI-labeled (orange) MSCs, over time. Scale bars = 50 µm. (e) Immunofluorescence showed that donor cells (CM-DiI-labeled; orange) in the IM group formed cell-clusters within the myocardium, which decreased in size over time. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 2Elimination of the epicardium after FG-aided epicardial placement of MSCs. (a) Immunohistostaining for cleaved caspase 3 (c-caspase 3) showed a reduction of apoptosis of donor MSCs (white arrowheads) in the FG-MSC group compared to the IM-MSC group at day 3 after cell therapy. Orange signals in the c-caspase 3 panels were leaked fluorescence from the highly bright CM-DiI (red). Scale bars = 50 µm. *p < 0.05, n = 6 in each group. (b) Immunostaining for Ki67 showed rare proliferation of donor MSCs (white arrowheads) at day 3 after cell therapy in either group. Orange signals in the Ki67 panels were leaked fluorescent signals from the bright CM-DiI (red). Scale bars = 40 µm. n = 6 in each group. (c) Immunohistostaining analysis detected an ICAM-1+ monolayer of the epicardium in the normal (no-MI) heart and the heart of the Sham group (sham treatment in ICM rats). This epicardium disappeared by day 1 after FG-aided, instant epicardial placement of MSCs (labeled with CM-DiI; yellow). CM-DiI is originally red/orange, but CM-DiI-labeled MSCs exhibit yellow color in the figure. This is because CM-DiI-labeling of MSCs were extremely intense, and the strong red fluorescence leaked into the green channel. This was particularly the case when the labelled MSCs densely aggregated. Scale bar = 100 µm. (d) Immunohistostaining analysis detected PECAM1+ (green) and CM-DiI+ (yellow) vessels, suggesting trans-differentiation of donor MSCs to endothelial cells in both FG-MSC and IM-MSC groups (white arrows). As explained above, CM-DiI-labeled MSCs exhibited yellow color, but these yellow cells were distinguishable from the PECAM1+CM-DiI+ cells, which showed a different yellow color. In addition, PECAM1+ (green) but CM-DiI− vessels were observed, indicating host-derived endothelial cells (blue arrows). Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 3Enhanced upregulation of reparative genes after FG-aided, epicardial placement of MSCs. Real time RT-PCR analysis detected increased expression of multiple reparative genes in the FG-MSC group, as compared to the Sham (ICM with no treatment), IM-MSC, and FG-Cont (epicardial placement of FG without MSCs) groups at day 3 (left panel) and day 28 (right panel). Relative expression to the Sham group is shown. *p < 0.05 vs. the Sham group, †p < 0.05 vs. IM-MSC group. §p < 0.05 vs. FG-Cont group. n = 6 hearts in each group.
Figure 4Enhanced microvasculature formation after FG-aided, epicardial placement of MSCs. (a) Isolectin B4 staining detected an increased capillary density in the peri-infarct viable area in the FG-MSC group, as compared to the Sham, IM-MSC and FG-Cont groups at day 7. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Co-immunohistostaining for PECAM1 and Ki67 detected an increased percentage of PECAM1+Ki67+ proliferating endothelial cells in the peri-infarct area of the FG-MSC group compared to the Sham, IM-MSC and FG-Cont groups at day 7. White arrows indicate PECAM1+Ki67+ cells. Scale bar = 20 μm. n = 6 hearts in each group. *p < 0.05 vs. Sham group, †p < 0.05 vs. IM-MSC group. §p < 0.05 vs. FG-Cont group.
Figure 5Attenuated adverse ventricular remodeling after FG-aided, epicardial placement of MSCs in the ICM rat heart. (a) Cross-sectional area of cTnT cardiomyocyte was measured using immunohistolabeling samples at day 28 post-treatment. Scale bar = 50 μm. (b) Post-MI interstitial fibrosis in the peri-infarct area was assessed by picrosirius red staining at day 28 post-treatment. Scale bar = 100 μm. (c) Accumulation of CD163+ cells (green) in the myocardium at day 7 was most evident in the FG-MSC group. Scale bar = 100 μm. n = 6 hearts in each group. *p < 0.05 vs. the Sham group, †p < 0.05 vs. IM-MSC group. §p < 0.05 vs. FG-Cont group.
Pre- and post-treatment cardiac function assessed by echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
| Echocardiography pre-treatment (=4 weeks after MI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | HR (bpm) | LVEF (%) | LVFS (%) | LVDs (mm) | LVDd (mm) |
| Sham | 12 | 390.5 ± 8.7 | 36.2 ± 1.3 | 18.2 ± 0.7 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 8.3 ± 0.1 |
| IM-MSC | 13 | 399.0 ± 6.7 | 35.8 ± 1.4 | 18.0 ± 0.8 | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 8.5 ± 0.1 |
| FG-MSC | 13 | 392.6 ± 6.8 | 35.8 ± 1.0 | 18.2 ± 0.5 | 6.9 ± 0.2 | 8.4 ± 0.2 |
| FG-Cont | 12 | 383.6 ± 7.9 | 35.4 ± 1.2 | 17.7 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 8.4 ± 0.1 |
|
| ||||||
| Group | n | HR (bpm) | LVEF (%) | LVFS (%) | LVDs (mm) | LVDd (mm) |
| Sham | 12 | 394.7 ± 8.3 | 33.3 ± 1.5 | 16.3 ± 0.8 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 9.2 ± 0.2 |
| IM-MSC | 13 | 393.1 ± 6.6 | 38.9 ± 1.7*† | 20.2 ± 1.0*† | 7.1 ± 0.2*† | 8.9 ± 0.2 |
| FG-MSC | 13 | 399.6 ± 6.2 | 43.0 ± 1.4*†§ | 23.2 ± 0.8*†§ | 6.6 ± 0.1*†§ | 8.6 ± 0.2* |
| FG-Cont | 12 | 387.6 ± 8.3 | 34.2 ± 1.6 | 16.7 ± 1.0 | 7.5 ± 0.2 | 9.0 ± 0.2 |
| Group | n | HR (bpm) | Dev Pressure (mmHg) | LVEDP (mmHg) | Max dP/dt (mmHg/s) | Min dP/dt (mmHg/s) |
| Sham | 12 | 380.5 ± 2.6 | 106.2 ± 3.8 | 10.2 ± 2.0 | 6,463 ± 265 | −6,484 ± 234 |
| IM-MSC | 13 | 391.7 ± 4.2 | 120.1 ± 4.0* | 8.7 ± 1.2 | 7,735 ± 275*† | −6,950 ± 198* |
| FG-MSC | 13 | 388.7 ± 5.9 | 138.5 ± 3.9*†§ | 6.3 ± 0.8*†§ | 8,044 ± 268*†§ | −7,705 ± 262*†§ |
| FG-Cont | 12 | 379.8 ± 4.0 | 111.9 ± 3.7 | 9.2 ± 1.3 | 6,876 ± 321 | −6,773 ± 314 |
Sham group; Sham surgery (open chest only) at 4 weeks after MI
IM-MSC group; intramyocardial MSC injection at 4 weeks after MI
FG-MSC group; epicardial placement of FG incorporating MSC at 4 weeks after MI
FG-Cont group; epicardial placement of FG without MSC at 4 weeks after MI
HR, heart rate; bpm, beat per minute; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVFS, left ventricular fractional shortening; LVDs, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LVDd, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; Dev Pressure, left ventricular developed pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.
*p < 0.05 vs. Sham group, †p < 0.05 vs. FG-Cont group, §p < 0.05 vs. IM-MSC group, Mean ± SEM.