| Literature DB >> 29930252 |
H Hirata1, Y Hinoda2, V Shahryari1, G Deng1, Y Tanaka1, Z L Tabatabai3, R Dahiya4.
Abstract
The authors report that there is a mistake in the representative picture of Fig. 4D (top row: PC3-miR1260b inh-0h) in the original version. The correct version of Fig. 4 with the original pictures for both PC3 miR-NC inh-0h and PC3-miR1260b inh-0h are provided below.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29930252 PMCID: PMC6068093 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0146-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Fig. 4Effect of miR-1260b knockdown on prostate cancer cells (PC-3, DU-145). Two prostate cancer cell lines (PC-3 and DU-145) were transiently transfected with either miR-1260b inhibitor or miR-negative control (miR-NC inhibitor). a Relative miR-1260b expression (miR-NC inhibitor or miR-1260b inhibitor transfected PC cells), b cell viability assay (miR-NC inhibitor or miR-1260b inhibitor transfected PC cells), c invasion assay, d wound healing assay (16–17 h). e Apoptosis assay, f cell cycle analysis, g TCF reporter assay. Error bars represent ±s.d