QUESTION: Are additional weekend allied health services effective and cost-effective for acute general medical and surgical wards, and subacute rehabilitation hospital wards? DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between January 2000 and May 2017. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Meta-analyses were conducted for relative measures of effect estimates. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to acute general medical and surgical wards, and subacute rehabilitation wards. INTERVENTION: All services delivered by allied health professionals during weekends (Saturday and/or Sunday). This study limited allied health professions to: occupational therapy, physiotherapy, social work, speech pathology, dietetics, art therapy, chiropractic, exercise physiology, music therapy, oral health (not dentistry), osteopathy, podiatry, psychology, and allied health assistants. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital length of stay, hospital re-admission, adverse events, discharge destination, functional independence, health-related quality of life, and cost of hospital care. RESULTS: Nineteen articles (20 studies) were identified, comprising 10 randomised and 10 non-randomised trials. Physiotherapy was the most commonly investigated profession. A meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials showed that providing additional weekend allied health services in subacute rehabilitation wards reduced hospital length of stay by 2.35days (95% CI 0.45 to 4.24, I2=0%), and may be a cost-effective way to improve function (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19, I2=0%), and health-related quality of life (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.20, I2=0%). For acute general medical and surgical hospital wards, it was unclear whether the weekend allied health service model provided in the two identified randomised trials led to significant changes in measured outcomes. CONCLUSION: The benefit of providing additional allied health services is clearer in subacute rehabilitation settings than for acute general medical and surgical wards in hospitals. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD76771. [Sarkies MN, White J, Henderson K, Haas R, Bowles J, Evidence Translation in Allied Health (EviTAH) Group (2018) Additional weekend allied health services reduce length of stay in subacute rehabilitation wards but their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are unclear in acute general medical and surgical hospital wards: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 142-158].
QUESTION: Are additional weekend allied health services effective and cost-effective for acute general medical and surgical wards, and subacute rehabilitation hospital wards? DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between January 2000 and May 2017. Two reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Meta-analyses were conducted for relative measures of effect estimates. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to acute general medical and surgical wards, and subacute rehabilitation wards. INTERVENTION: All services delivered by allied health professionals during weekends (Saturday and/or Sunday). This study limited allied health professions to: occupational therapy, physiotherapy, social work, speech pathology, dietetics, art therapy, chiropractic, exercise physiology, music therapy, oral health (not dentistry), osteopathy, podiatry, psychology, and allied health assistants. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital length of stay, hospital re-admission, adverse events, discharge destination, functional independence, health-related quality of life, and cost of hospital care. RESULTS: Nineteen articles (20 studies) were identified, comprising 10 randomised and 10 non-randomised trials. Physiotherapy was the most commonly investigated profession. A meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials showed that providing additional weekend allied health services in subacute rehabilitation wards reduced hospital length of stay by 2.35days (95% CI 0.45 to 4.24, I2=0%), and may be a cost-effective way to improve function (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19, I2=0%), and health-related quality of life (SMD 0.10, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.20, I2=0%). For acute general medical and surgical hospital wards, it was unclear whether the weekend allied health service model provided in the two identified randomised trials led to significant changes in measured outcomes. CONCLUSION: The benefit of providing additional allied health services is clearer in subacute rehabilitation settings than for acute general medical and surgical wards in hospitals. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD76771. [Sarkies MN, White J, Henderson K, Haas R, Bowles J, Evidence Translation in Allied Health (EviTAH) Group (2018) Additional weekend allied health services reduce length of stay in subacute rehabilitation wards but their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are unclear in acute general medical and surgical hospital wards: a systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 142-158].
Authors: David A Snowdon; Beth Storr; Annette Davis; Nicholas F Taylor; Cylie M Williams Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Mitchell N Sarkies; Suzanne Robinson; Tom Briffa; Stephen J Duffy; Mark Nelson; John Beltrame; Louise Cullen; Derek Chew; Julian Smith; David Brieger; Peter Macdonald; Danny Liew; Chris Reid Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2021-04-21
Authors: Mitchell N Sarkies; Lauren M Robins; Megan Jepson; Cylie M Williams; Nicholas F Taylor; Lisa O'Brien; Jenny Martin; Anne Bardoel; Meg E Morris; Leeanne M Carey; Anne E Holland; Katrina M Long; Terry P Haines Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 11.069