| Literature DB >> 29929510 |
Lu Wang1,2,3,4, Nannan Zhang2,3,4,5, Yi Zhang2,3,4, Jingen Xia2,3,4, Qingyuan Zhan6,7,8, Chen Wang9,10,11,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation can cause ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and lung fibrosis; however, the underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. RNA sequencing is a powerful means for detecting vitally important protein-coding transcripts and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) on a genome-wide scale, which may be helpful for reducing this knowledge gap.Entities:
Keywords: LncRNAs; Lung fibrosis; RNA-seq; Ventilator-induced lung injury
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29929510 PMCID: PMC6013938 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-018-0822-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Fig. 1Time course of histologic injury and resolution following ventilation. Representative histological image of lung sections stained with H&E. VILI induced early inflammatory injury with significant alveolar hemorrhage and inflammatory infiltration, which was followed by a marked fibrotic response on day 7 after ventilation (original images, 400× magnification; scale bar = 50 μm)
Fig. 2Identification of animal model. a Masson staining. b Sirius Red staining, red and green color indicated collagen I and collagen III, respectively. c α-SMA staining. d The comparisons of collagen deposition area. e The comparisons of lung collagen type. f The relative expression level of α-SMA in groups. g Lung wet-to-dry weight ratio. h Lung hydroxyproline content. i The expression level of TGF-β1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Statistical analysis was carried out with one-way ANOVA, and the significance level was set at: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 3Differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) in lungs. Heat map for hierarchical clustering of all of the involved DETs in the comparisons of each pair. In clustering analysis, upregulated and downregulated genes are colored in red and blue. The heat map was performed based on the normalized fragments per kilo-base of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM) of each DET. Differential expression analysis used a model based on the negative binomial distribution, and transcripts with p < 0.05 and fold change > 2 were regarded as DETs
Fig. 4Pathway analysis. a Histogram showing the pivotal enriched pathways in both stages of inflammation and fibrosis. b Histogram indicated the significant pathways when the VILI and sham groups were compared on day 0. c Histogram indicated the significant pathways in the comparison between day 7 and day 0 in the VILI group. All analyses were performed using KOBAS 3.0 and statistical significance was assessed using the hypergeometric test or Fisher’s exact test with the false discovery rate (FDR) correction method
Fig. 5The differentially expressed (DE) profiling of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). a–c Volcano plot indicating the comparisons between each pair. Only the statistically significant genes are represented in the graph. In all cases, spots colored in red and green represent upregulated and downregulated transcripts, respectively; blue represents non-differentially expressed genes. The FDR ≤ 0.01 and FC ≥ 2 were set as the thresholds to determine the significance of DETs. d–f Venn diagram showing the overlapping DETs in comparisons of each pair. Venn diagram analysis was conducted with an online tool (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). g Heat map for hierarchical clustering of all of the involved DE lncRNAs
Fig. 6Pathway analysis of the target genes. a Histogram showing the pivotal enriched pathways in both stages of inflammation and fibrosis that were regulated by DE lncRNAs. b Histogram indicating the significant pathways that were regulated by DE lncRNAs when comparing the VILI and sham group on day 0. c Histogram indicating the significant pathways that were regulated by DE lncRNAs in the comparison between day 7 and day 0 in the VILI group. All analyses were performed with KOBAS 3.0, and the statistical significance was assessed using the hypergeometric test or Fisher’s exact test with the FDR correction method
Fig. 7LncRNA-mRNA regulatory network analysis. a lncRNA-mRNA regulatory network of the VILI group compared to the sham group on day 0. b lncRNA-mRNA regulatory network of the VILI group on day 7 versus day 0. In all of the cases, red and green colors represent upregulated and downregulated target genes, respectively; grey solid lines indicate the prediction correlation of lncRNAs and protein coding genes resulting from the co-expression analysis and co-location analyses
Fig. 8qPCR validation. a–c The relative expression levels randomly validated DETs and lncRNAs. The relative expression levels were normalized to 18S. Comparisons between two groups were determined by the Student’s t-test, significance level was set at: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 versus sham group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 versus VILI group on day 0