Literature DB >> 29928758

Interactions between large and small detritivores influence how biodiversity impacts litter decomposition.

Alan M Tonin1,2, Jesús Pozo2, Silvia Monroy2, Ana Basaguren2, Javier Pérez2, José F Gonçalves1, Richard Pearson3, Bradley J Cardinale4, Luz Boyero2,3,5.   

Abstract

Understanding how biodiversity loss influences plant litter decomposition-that is, the biologically mediated conversion of coarse to fine particulate organic matter-is crucial to predict changes in the functioning of many stream ecosystems, where detrital food webs are dominant. Rates of litter decomposition are influenced by detritivore diversity, but the mechanisms behind this relationship are uncertain. As differences in detritivore body size are a major determinant of interspecific interactions, they should be key for predicting effects of detritivore diversity on decomposition. To explore this question, we manipulated detritivore diversity and body size simultaneously in a microcosm experiment using two small (Leuctra geniculata and Lepidostoma hirtum) and two large detritivore species (Sericostoma pyrenaicum and Echinogammarus berilloni) in all possible 1-, 2- and 4-species combinations, and litter discs of Alnus glutinosa. We expected that larger species would facilitate smaller species through the production of smaller litter fragments, resulting in faster decomposition and greater growth of smaller species in polycultures containing species of different body size. To examine this hypothesis, we used a set of "diversity-interaction" models that explored how decomposition was affected by different interspecific interactions and the role of body size, and quantified the magnitude of such effect through ratios of decomposition rates and detritivore growth between polycultures and monocultures. We found a clear positive effect of detritivore diversity on decomposition, which was mainly explained by facilitation and niche partitioning. Facilitation of small animals by larger ones was evidenced by a 12% increase in decomposition rates in polycultures compared to monocultures and the higher growth (20%) of small species, which partly fed on fine particulate organic matter produced by larger animals. When the large species were together in polycultures, decomposition was enhanced by 19%, but there were no changes in growth; niche partitioning was a plausible mechanism behind the increase in decomposition rates, as both species fed on different parts of litter discs, only one species being able to eat less palatable parts. Our study demonstrates that interspecific differences in body size should be taken into account in diversity-decomposition studies. Future studies should also consider differences in species' vulnerability to extinction depending on body size and how this might affect ecosystem functioning in different scenarios of detritivore diversity and more complex food webs.
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2018 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body size; detritivore assemblages; ecosystem functioning; facilitation; resource partitioning; species richness; streams

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29928758     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  7 in total

1.  Dispersal syndromes can impact ecosystem functioning in spatially structured freshwater populations.

Authors:  Chelsea J Little; Emanuel A Fronhofer; Florian Altermatt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Species-specific traits predict whole-assemblage detritus processing by pond invertebrates.

Authors:  Scott A Wissinger; Jared A Balik; Cameron Leitz; Susan E Washko; Brittney Cleveland; Dianna M Krejsa; Marieke E Perchik; Alexander Stogsdill; Mike Vlah; Lee M Demi; Hamish S Greig; Isaac D Shepard; Brad W Taylor; Oliver J Wilmot
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.298

3.  Species identity drives ecosystem function in a subsidy-dependent coastal ecosystem.

Authors:  Kyle A Emery; Jenifer E Dugan; R A Bailey; Robert J Miller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Biodiversity mediates the effects of stressors but not nutrients on litter decomposition.

Authors:  Léa Beaumelle; Frederik De Laender; Nico Eisenhauer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Effects of two measures of riparian plant biodiversity on litter decomposition and associated processes in stream microcosms.

Authors:  Naiara López-Rojo; Javier Pérez; Ana Basaguren; Jesús Pozo; Juan Rubio-Ríos; J Jesús Casas; Luz Boyero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Rhizosphere element circling, multifunctionality, aboveground productivity and trade-offs are better predicted by rhizosphere rare taxa.

Authors:  Puchang Wang; Leilei Ding; Chao Zou; Yujun Zhang; Mengya Wang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Impacts of detritivore diversity loss on instream decomposition are greatest in the tropics.

Authors:  Luz Boyero; Naiara López-Rojo; Alan M Tonin; Javier Pérez; Francisco Correa-Araneda; Richard G Pearson; Jaime Bosch; Ricardo J Albariño; Sankarappan Anbalagan; Leon A Barmuta; Ana Basaguren; Francis J Burdon; Adriano Caliman; Marcos Callisto; Adolfo R Calor; Ian C Campbell; Bradley J Cardinale; J Jesús Casas; Ana M Chará-Serna; Eric Chauvet; Szymon Ciapała; Checo Colón-Gaud; Aydeé Cornejo; Aaron M Davis; Monika Degebrodt; Emerson S Dias; María E Díaz; Michael M Douglas; Andrea C Encalada; Ricardo Figueroa; Alexander S Flecker; Tadeusz Fleituch; Erica A García; Gabriela García; Pavel E García; Mark O Gessner; Jesús E Gómez; Sergio Gómez; Jose F Gonçalves; Manuel A S Graça; Daniel C Gwinn; Robert O Hall; Neusa Hamada; Cang Hui; Daichi Imazawa; Tomoya Iwata; Samuel K Kariuki; Andrea Landeira-Dabarca; Kelsey Laymon; María Leal; Richard Marchant; Renato T Martins; Frank O Masese; Megan Maul; Brendan G McKie; Adriana O Medeiros; Charles M M' Erimba; Jen A Middleton; Silvia Monroy; Timo Muotka; Junjiro N Negishi; Alonso Ramírez; John S Richardson; José Rincón; Juan Rubio-Ríos; Gisele M Dos Santos; Romain Sarremejane; Fran Sheldon; Augustine Sitati; Nathalie S D Tenkiano; Scott D Tiegs; Janine R Tolod; Michael Venarsky; Anne Watson; Catherine M Yule
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.