Literature DB >> 29928705

Neutrophilia as a biomarker for overall survival in newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Antoine Schernberg1,2, Alexandre Nivet1, Frédéric Dhermain1, Samy Ammari3, Alexandre Escande1, Johan Pallud4,5,6, Guillaume Louvel1, Eric Deutsch1,2,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic value of neutrophil disorders in a retrospective cohort of high-grade glioma patients receiving definitive concurrent temozolomide and radiation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive patients treated in our Institution between January 2005 and December 2010 with concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily) and radiation were collected. The prognostic value of pretreatment neutrophilia on survival, defined as a neutrophil count exceeding 7 G/L, was examined.
RESULTS: We identified 164 patients, all treated with concurrent temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy. Initial surgery was achieved in most (75%), with resection > 90% in 55 patients (34%). Total 151 patients (92%) had glioblastoma, and 13 patients (8%) had WHO grade III glioma. Eighty-two patients (50%) displayed pretreatment neutrophilia. Neutrophilia was not associated with concurrent or adjuvant temodal discontinuation (p > 0.3). The 2-year actuarial overall survival was 45%. Steroid consumption, i.e. 60 mg or more of daily prednisolone, increased pretreatment neutrophil count (p = 0.005). In univariate analysis, neutrophilia was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.019), as well as age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.009), surgical resection < 90% (p = 0.003) and prednisolone consumption ≥ 60 mg/day (p = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, neutrophilia (p = 0.013), age ≥ 65 (p = 0.001), and surgical tumor resection < 90% (p = 0.010) independently decreased overall survival, while, steroid consumption was not (p = 0.088).
CONCLUSION: In high-grade gliomas treated with concurrent temozolomide and radiation, pretreatment neutrophilia may be a significant prognosis factor for overall survival. In addition with previously available markers, this independent cost-effective biomarker could help identifying patients with worsened prognosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Concurrent chemoradiation; Glioblastoma; High grade gliomas; Neutrophilia; Prognostic factor

Year:  2018        PMID: 29928705      PMCID: PMC6008628          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2405-6308


Introduction

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Since 2005, standard treatment for glioblastoma patients is maximal safe surgical resection followed by combined radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy [1]. Phase III studies with an addition of targeted antiangiogenic therapies failed to show benefits in overall survival compared to the Stupp protocol [2], [3]. Age, performance status (PS), extent of resection, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status have demonstrated their prognostic impact on patients outcome [4]. The MGMT DNA repair enzyme antagonizes the genotoxic effects of alkylating agents. Its low expression is associated with favorable outcome in patients with glioblastoma undergoing alkylating agent based chemotherapy [5]. Still, prognostic markers to guide individual concomitant and maintenance therapy are mandatory. In addition to cancer cells, stromal cells, blood vessels and infiltrating inflammatory cells are major components of the tumor microenvironment [6]. As additional markers, prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 4 in peripheral blood had previously been described in glioblastoma as an accessible and cost-effective marker of systemic inflammatory responses [7], [8], [9]. Still, NLR reflects either neutrophilia, lymphopenia or both. In gliomas, high level of CD4(+) tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) combined with low CD8(+) TILs has been associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients [10]. Neutrophils are the most abundant circulating leukocytes, and stand as early immune defense. As leukocytes influence the function and phenotype of CD8+ T cells, neutrophils could represent a potential prognosis biomarker in patients with high-grade gliomas [11]. Recently, tumor-associated neutrophilia has been associated with poor clinical outcome in several human cancers [12], [13], [14]. In the current study, prognostic significance of pretreatment systemic neutrophilia was retrospectively examined in a single center cohort of consecutive high-grade (III and IV) glioma adult patients treated with concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

Patients and tumors

We examined clinical records of all consecutive patients registered in our institution between January 2005 and December 2010. We excluded patients with pretreatment immune disorder, patients with grade I or II gliomas at diagnosis, and patients treated with hypofractionated chemoradiation. All patients had been referred to a multidisciplinary neuro-oncology tumor board prior treatment initiation. Explorations at diagnosis included both computed tomography (CT) and a brain magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) with at least T2, FLAIR, T1 and T1 enhanced gadolinium sequences.

Treatment characteristics and follow-up

After prior surgical resection or biopsy, patients received concurrent radiotherapy. Prescribed doses were 60 Gy administered as 2-Gy fractions 5 days per week in patients with glioblastoma, or 59,4 Gy delivered by 1.8 Gy per fraction in patients with grade III gliomas. All patients had daily concomitant oral temozolomide (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day for a maximum of 49 days). Radiotherapy was planned with a dedicated computed tomography (CT) and three-dimensional planning systems; conformal radiotherapy was delivered with linear accelerators with nominal energy of 6 MV or more. Radiotherapy was delivered by a 3D conformal technique. The concurrent-therapy phase was followed by a 28-day treatment break. During the adjuvant part, patients received temozolomide (150 mg per square meter per day on days 1–5 during the first cycle and 200 mg per square meter per day during subsequent cycles if unacceptable toxic effects did not occur) [1]. Patients were assessed 6 weeks after the completion of treatment with physical examination and imaging studies and then with physical examination every 2–3 months until progression.

Complete blood count analysis

Complete blood count were obtained postoperatively in the week preceding the first chemoradiation for the current analysis. The daily steroid dose considered in the analysis was on the day of the drawing of the blood sample. Patients underwent systematic complete white blood cell counts (WBC) weekly during chemoradiation. Leukocytosis and neutrophilia assessing biological inflammation were defined as blood count over 10 G/L and 7 G/L, respectively. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin count below 13.0 g/dL. Thrombocytosis, lymphopenia, and monocytosis were defined as platelets count over 400 G/L, lymphocytes count below 1.0 G/L, and monocytes count over 1.0 G/L, respectively. We tested these parameters for statistical correlation with OS. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count, with 4 being the cutoff for positivity, in accordance with the previously published literature [9].

Statistical analysis

Differences in patient characteristics regarding pretreatment neutrophilia were compared with Fisher test, Student-t test, and by variance analysis. Survival times were defined as the time between the diagnosis and time of death for OS, estimated by the Kaplan Meier method. Patients were censored at the time of last follow-up visit. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical comparisons were performed using the log-rank test for univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model with variables with p value <0.1 in univariate analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using R (version 3.3.2).

Results

Among 164 patients, median age was 60 years (range: 19–83). Total 13 patients (8%) had grade III glioma, and 151 patients (92%) had glioblastoma. On initial blood count, before the week of the initial chemoradiation part, median neutrophil count was 7.0 G/L (1.6–16.6). Leukocytosis and neutrophilia were found in 60 patients (37%) and 82 (50%) patients, respectively (Table 1A & Supplementary Fig. S1). Mean neutrophil count were comparable in patients with grade III gliomas or glioblastomas: 7.0 vs. 7.3 G/L, respectively (p = 0.701). Patients with daily prednisolone equivalent dose below 60 mg (6.7 G/L) had significantly lower neutrophil counts compared to patients with dose above 60 mg (8.5 G/L; p = 0.005) (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Table 1A

Patients characteristics.

CharacteristicsOverall population
Neutrophils ≥ 7 G/L (pretreatment)
No
Yes
p
n (%) or median [range]
Patients characteristics
Number of patients164 (100%)82 (50%)82 (50%)
Age (years)60 [19, 83]59 [19, 83]60 [23, 81]0.565
<65 y119 (72.6%)63 (76.8%)56 (68%)0.294
≥65 y45 (27%)19 (23%)26 (31.7%)
GenderMale108 (66%)59 (72%)49 (60%)0.138
Female56 (34%)23 (28%)33 (40%)
PS0100 (61%)56 (68%)44 (54%)0.078
≥164 (39%)26 (32%)38 (46%)
KPS≥70142 (87%)76 (93%)66 (80%)0.039
<7022 (13%)6 (7%)16 (20%)
SurgeryYes123 (75%)69 (84%)54 (66%)0.012
No41 (25%)13 (16%)28 (34%)
>90%55 (34%)30 (37%)25 (31%)0.449
WHO GradeIII13 (8%)5 (6%)8 (10%)0.563
IV151 (92%)77 (94%)74 (90%)
Corticosteroid daily dose(mg)40 [0, 160]40 [0, 100]40 [0, 160]<0.001
<60 mg/d104 (63%)63 (77%)41 (50%)<0.001
≥60 mg/d50 (31%)13 (16%)37 (45%)
NA10 (6%)6 (7%)4 (5%)



Baseline biology
Haemoglobin (g/dL)13.7 [9.6, 17.1]13.7 [9.6, 16.2]13.7 [9.8, 17.1]0.736
AnemiaYes50 (30.5%)23 (28%)27 (32.9%)0.611
No114 (69.5%)59 (72%)55 (67%)
Platelet (G/L)250 [121, 953]248 [140, 463]258 [121, 953]0.241
Leukocytes (G/L)8.9 [3.7, 18.9]7.2 [3.7, 12.4]11.2 [7.9, 18.9]<0.001
LeukocytosisYes60 (37%)1 (1%)59 (72%)<0.001
No99 (60%)78 (95%)21 (26%)
NA5 (3%)3 (4%)2 (2%)
Neutrophils (G/L)7.0 [1.6, 16.6]5.0 [1.6, 6.9]9.0 [7.0, 16.6]<0.001
NeutrophiliaYes82 (50%)0 (0%)82 (100%)<0.001
No82 (50%)82 (100%)0 (0%)
Lymphocytes (G/L)1.3 [0.2, 3.3]1.4 [0.5, 2.9]1.1 [0.2, 3.3]0.005
LymphopeniaYes40 (24%)9 (11%)31 (38%)<0.001
No124 (75.6%)73 (89%)51 (62%)
Monocytes (G/L)0.5 [0.1, 1.5]0.5 [0.2, 1.5]0.5 [0.1, 1.5]0.050
MonocytosisYes10 (6%)2 (2%)8 (10%)0.010
No107 (65%)49 (60%)58 (71%)
NA47 (28.7%)31 (38%)16 (19%)
NLR5.1 [0.7, 83]3.4 [0.7, 8]8.9 [2.5, 83]<0.001
NLR<462 (37.8%)51 (62%)11 (13%)<0.001
≥4102 (62%)31 (38%)71 (87%)

KPS: Karnofsky Performance Status; NLR: Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio; PS: Performance Status; WHO: World Health Organization classification.

Patients characteristics. KPS: Karnofsky Performance Status; NLR: Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio; PS: Performance Status; WHO: World Health Organization classification.

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy

All patients underwent a 3D-conformal brain irradiation to a median 60.0 Gy dose (range: 14–60) with concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily during chemoradiation). Median delay from surgery was 1.5 month (range: 0.1–13.3). Most of the patients received the planned treatment doses; adverse events leading to discontinuation of temozolomide involved 11 patients (7%) during chemoradiation phase, and 68 patients (41.5%) during maintenance phase. A total of 5 (3%) and 11 (7%) patients discontinued or stopped concomitant temodal therapy, independent from pretreatment neutrophilia (p = 0.670 and p = 0.371 respectively). Similar, 15 (11%) patients discontinued concomitant temodal therapy for toxicity, independently from neutrophilia (p = 0.377) (Table 1B).
Table 1B

Treatment characteristics.

CharacteristicsOverall population
Neutrophils ≥ 7 G/L (pretreatment)
No
Yes
p
n (%) or median [range]
Treatment characteristics
Number of patients164 (100%)82 (50%)82 (50%)
Radiotherapy dose (Gy)60.0 [14, 60]60.00 [13.75, 60]60.00 [34, 60]0.212
Concomitant TMZYes164 (100%)82 (100%)82 (100%)NaN
Concomitant BVZNo163 (99%)82 (100%)81 (99%)0.495
Yes1 (1%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
Concomitant TMZ discontinuationNo143 (87%)72 (88%)71 (87%)0.542
Yes11 (7%)4 (5%)7 (8%)
NA10 (6%)6 (7%)4 (5%)
Adjuvant TMZNo25 (15%)11 (13%)14 (17%)0.808
Yes135 (82%)69 (84%)66 (81%)
NA4 (2%)2 (2%)2 (2%)
N adjuvant TMZ cycles6 [1, 12]6 [1, 12]6 [1, 12]0.481
Adjuvant TMZ discontinuationNo65 (39.6%)38 (46%)27 (32.9%)0.213
Yes68 (41.5%)30 (36.6%)38 (46%)
NA31 (18.9%)14 (17%)17 (20.7%)

BVZ: Bevacizumab; Gy: Gray; TMZ: Temozolomide.

Treatment characteristics. BVZ: Bevacizumab; Gy: Gray; TMZ: Temozolomide.

Survival and disease control

145 patients (88%) died during the follow-up (median 28.7 months; range, 0.5–99.0). Estimated 1 and 2-years OS were 75% (95%CI: 68–82) and 45% (95%CI: 37–53), respectively.

Prognostic value of leucocytes disorders

We analyzed the prognostic value of leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and significant prognostic factors as described in previous publications (i.e. PS, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), age > 65, gender, resection rate > 90%) [15]. In univariate analysis, the factors significantly associated with poor OS were neutrophilia (p = 0.019), age ≥ 65 (p = 0.009), PS ≥ 1 (p = 0.066), surgical resection < 90% (p = 0.003), prednisolone equivalent daily dose ≥ 60 mg/day (p = 0.016), and absence of maintenance chemotherapy (p = 0.009). KPS > 70 (p = 0.694), anemia (p = 0.789), leukocytosis (p = 0.313), monocytosis (p = 0.384), lymphopenia (p = 0.105), and NLR ≥ 4 (p = 0.090) were not related with OS. At 2-year follow-up, estimated OS was 51% (95%CI: 41–63%) for patients that had not initial neutrophilia vs. 38% (95%CI: 28–51%) for patients with initial neutrophilia (Fig. 1). In glioblastomas patients, estimated 2-years OS was 48% (95%CI: 38–61%) in absence of neutrophilia vs. 35% (95%CI: 25–48%) if they had (p = 0.014) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Estimated overall survival in grade III and IV glioma patients, with or without neutrophilia. Neutrophilia: neutrophil count ≥ 7 G/L.

Fig. 2

Estimated overall survival in patients with or without neutrophilia, stratifying on WHO tumor grade. N: neutrophil count, < or ≥ 7 G/L.

Estimated overall survival in grade III and IV glioma patients, with or without neutrophilia. Neutrophilia: neutrophil count ≥ 7 G/L. Estimated overall survival in patients with or without neutrophilia, stratifying on WHO tumor grade. N: neutrophil count, < or ≥ 7 G/L. In multivariate analysis, apart from age ≥ 65, gender, PS, surgical resection quality or corticosteroid requirement, neutrophilia was independently associated with poor OS with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.57 (95%CI: 1.10–2.23, p = 0.013). Age ≥ 65 and surgical resection < 90% were also associated with inferior OS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.010, respectively) (Table 2).
Table 2

Results of univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox) analyses (significant factors in bold) for overall survival.

UNIVARIATEMULTIVARIATE
HRLower 95%Upper 95%p
Neutrophilia (vs. absence)0.0191.571.102.230.013
Age ≥ 65y (vs. <65y)0.0091.921.292.870.001
Female gender (vs. Male gender)0.1020.053
WHO Grade IV (vs. Grade III)0.0620.160
PS = 0 (vs. PS ≥ 1)0.0660.498
Resection > 90% (vs. <90% or biopsy)0.0030.600.410.880.010
Prednisolone ≥ 60 mg/d (vs. <60 mg/d)0.0160.088

Neutrophilia: neutrophil count ≥ 7 G/L; PS: Performance status; WHO: World Health Organization.

Results of univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox) analyses (significant factors in bold) for overall survival. Neutrophilia: neutrophil count ≥ 7 G/L; PS: Performance status; WHO: World Health Organization.

Discussion

The present study associated neutrophilia, as marker of systemic inflammation, with worse survival among high-grade gliomas patients undergoing chemoradiation. A previous study associated elevated neutrophil count with poor OS in patients with glioblastoma, suggesting its relation with more aggressive tumor, and activation of peripheral neutrophils as early sign of tumor progression [16]. Intratumoral neutrophil infiltration also significantly correlated with tumor grade in glioma patients [17]. These results are consistent with the present study, displaying an independent association between neutrophilia and poor prognosis. The lack of prognosis significance from tumor WHO grade (p = 0.062) can be imputed to the small subset of WHO grade III glioma patients. Also, the inclusion of grade III glioma patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation implies excluding patients treated with adjuvant PCV and presenting more favourable tumor phenotypes (IDH1 or TERT promoter mutations, 1p19q codeletion) [18]. Neutrophils both can exert antitumoral (N1 phenotype) or protumoral (N2 phenotype) activity, depending on the tumor micro environment [19]. There is also an complex interplay between tumor associated neutrophils and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes [19], [20]. NLR is the most studied prognosis biomarker derived from peripheral blood cell count analysis in glioblastoma patients [7], [8], [9]. It owns potential double information, both immunosuppressive state through lymphopenia, and inflammatory condition through neutrophilia. We studied the most commonly published NLR cutoff at 4 [7], [8], [9]. Despite their immunosuppressive state, partially related with long-term steroid use, patients with glioblastoma often have an increase in circulating neutrophils [17]. As corticosteroids consumption increase neutrophil and decrease lymphocyte counts, it may heavily influence NLR. A recent change or tapering schedule in steroid dosage administration was previously related with significant white blood cells variations [21]. In the context of brain tumors, CD4 lymphopenia was associated with worse prognosis [10]. In glioblastoma patients, both neutrophils in peripheral blood and in the tumor microenvironment have been associated with a major role in glioblastoma-induced T-cell suppression [22]. In our population, NLR was not able to predict patient survival (p = 0.090), neither lymphopenia (p = 0.105). Moreover, neutrophilia was independently associated with patients OS, even after adjusting on corticosteroid daily dose (p = 0.013) in the multivariate analysis. Preclinical study showed that T cells from patients with glioblastoma displayed minimal proliferation, IFN-γ production, and increasing numbers of degranulated neutrophils within the peripheral circulation [23]. As neutrophils promotes inflammation through infections and tissue damage conditions, it could promote fast-growing tumor phenotype associated with necrosis and treatment resistance. Recent clinical and experimental data suggested that corticosteroids decreases the effectiveness of radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-induced genotoxic stress, and reduces OS in glioblastoma [24]. Beyond the established adverse effect profile of protracted corticosteroid use, this analysis substantiates the request for prudent and restricted use of corticosteroids in glioblastoma patients, and anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-antibody increased tumour cell death, without improving OS when combined with radiotherapy [24]. Bevacizumab treatment reduced steroid use, yet no survival difference was seen [2], [3]. These findings emphasizes the importance of identifying alternative agents such as VEGF antagonists for managing oedema in glioblastoma patients [24]. In the present study, higher steroid daily doses correlated with higher pretreatment neutrophil count (p = 0.005). Steroïds decreased OS in univariate analysis (p = 0.016) but was not independently associated with OS (p = 0.088). Taken together, these findings and the present study suggests that neutrophilia may independently predict OS, through definition of more aggressive disease and high amount of necrosis, independently from glucocorticoid intakes. The dichotomy of neutrophils activity is partially described: they both can exert antitumoral or protumoral activity (N1 or N2 phenotype respectively) [25]. Glioblastoma patients displays decreased function of natural killer cells and T cells, and high peripheral release of both TGF-β [16], [26]. Past studies established that tumor associated neutrophils are polarized from an protumor N2 to an antitumor N1 phenotype in the absence of TGF-β, and radiation therapy may induces the N1 polarization [27]. Targeting granulocytes, TGF-β or S100A4 may be effective approaches to inhibit the glioma malignant phenotype and diminish antiangiogenic therapy resistance. Clinical trials are currently planned, ongoing or completed, e.g. SAPPHIRE trial (NCT00761280) for the targeted inhibition of TGF-β2. Still, therapeutic targeting neutrophils, key keepers against host infection will be challenging. The strength of this study is the robust association between neutrophilia and poor prognosis in both anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma in a homogenous cohort of high-grade glioma patients treated with concurrent temozolomide + RT. Our findings are consistent with previously published and biological recent discoveries. We highlighted prognosis value from neutrophil count before chemoradiation, independently from patients steroids requirements. Finally, we described independence from pretreatment neutrophilia and temozolomide discontinuation. Main limitations included its retrospective design, blood cell count evaluation before chemoradiation thus after surgery in most patients, and the absence of any notion of active smoking. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMT (O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase) DNA-repair gene by promoter methylation compromises DNA repair and has been associated with longer survival in patients with glioblastoma who receive alkylating agents. Thus, the absence of MGMT status hampers seriously the validity of the multivariate analysis on survival. In the context of glioblastoma, corticosteroids may compromise patients' survival [24]. In the present study, we revealed that neutrophilia was a prognosis biomarker, even after adjustment for the level of corticosteroid consumption. However, these data being retrospective, this result does not allow us to affirm the absence of correlation between survival, neutrophilia and corticosteroid consumption. Also, we were not able to assess neutrophils functional status in this population.

Conclusion

Pretreatment hematologic profile with initial neutrophilia may be a clinically relevant prognosis biomarker in high-grade gliomas patients treated with concomitant temozolomide and radiation. In addition with previously established prognosis factors, this independent biomarker may help identifying patients in future prognostic risk scores. Neutrophil count should be prospectively monitored in further clinical trials investigating targeted therapies or immunotherapies.

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.
  27 in total

1.  Neutrophil degranulation and immunosuppression in patients with GBM: restoration of cellular immune function by targeting arginase I.

Authors:  Trisha R Sippel; Jason White; Kamalika Nag; Vadim Tsvankin; Marci Klaassen; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Allen Waziri
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Neutrophil infiltration into human gliomas.

Authors:  G Fossati; G Ricevuti; S W Edwards; C Walker; A Dalton; M L Rossi
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.088

Review 3.  MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine?

Authors:  Michael Weller; Roger Stupp; Guido Reifenberger; Alba A Brandes; Martin J van den Bent; Wolfgang Wick; Monika E Hegi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 42.937

4.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  CD4+ T effector memory cell dysfunction is associated with the accumulation of granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Daniel Dubinski; Johannes Wölfer; Martin Hasselblatt; Tilman Schneider-Hohendorf; Ulrich Bogdahn; Walter Stummer; Heinz Wiendl; Oliver M Grauer
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Key role for neutrophils in radiation-induced antitumor immune responses: Potentiation with G-CSF.

Authors:  Tsuguhide Takeshima; Laurentiu M Pop; Aaron Laine; Puneeth Iyengar; Ellen S Vitetta; Raquibul Hannan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection does not impact survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Guillaume Louvel; Philippe Metellus; Georges Noel; Sophie Peeters; Jacques Guyotat; Julien Duntze; Pierre-Jean Le Reste; Phong Dam Hieu; Thierry Faillot; Fabien Litre; Nicolas Desse; Antoine Petit; Evelyne Emery; Jimmy Voirin; Johann Peltier; François Caire; Jean-Rodolphe Vignes; Jean-Luc Barat; Olivier Langlois; Philippe Menei; Sarah N Dumont; Marc Zanello; Edouard Dezamis; Frédéric Dhermain; Johan Pallud
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  The split nature of tumor-infiltrating leukocytes: Implications for cancer surveillance and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Telma Lança; Bruno Silva-Santos
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 8.110

9.  A prospective comparative clinical study of peripheral blood counts and indices in patients with primary brain tumors.

Authors:  V Subeikshanan; A Dutt; D Basu; M N Tejus; V P Maurya; V S Madhugiri
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.476

10.  Tumour-infiltrating CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes as predictors of clinical outcome in glioma.

Authors:  S Han; C Zhang; Q Li; J Dong; Y Liu; Y Huang; T Jiang; A Wu
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  19 in total

1.  Neutrophils promote tumor resistance to radiation therapy.

Authors:  Amy J Wisdom; Cierra S Hong; Alexander J Lin; Yu Xiang; Daniel E Cooper; Jin Zhang; Eric S Xu; Hsuan-Cheng Kuo; Yvonne M Mowery; David J Carpenter; Kushal T Kadakia; Jonathon E Himes; Lixia Luo; Yan Ma; Nerissa Williams; Diana M Cardona; Malay Haldar; Yarui Diao; Stephanie Markovina; Julie K Schwarz; David G Kirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Phenotypic plasticity of myeloid cells in glioblastoma development, progression, and therapeutics.

Authors:  Zengpanpan Ye; Xiaolin Ai; Linjie Zhao; Fan Fei; Ping Wang; Shengtao Zhou
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Prognostic significance of therapy-induced myelosuppression in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Emilie Le Rhun; Felix Boakye Oppong; Maureen Vanlancker; Roger Stupp; Burt Nabors; Olivier Chinot; Wolfgang Wick; Matthias Preusser; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 13.029

4.  Hemoglobin Levels and Red Blood Cells Distribution Width Highlights Glioblastoma Patients Subgroup With Improved Median Overall Survival.

Authors:  Tehila Kaisman-Elbaz; Yonatan Elbaz; Vladimir Merkin; Lianne Dym; Ariel Noy; Maya Atar-Vardi; Romi Bari; Sivan Turiel; Adi Alt; Tali Zamed; Yael Eskira; Konstantin Lavrenkov; Yarden Kezerle; Victor Dyomin; Israel Melamed
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Myeloid Cells in Glioblastoma Microenvironment.

Authors:  Alessandra De Leo; Alessio Ugolini; Filippo Veglia
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Research Supporting a Pilot Study of Metronomic Dapsone during Glioblastoma Chemoirradiation.

Authors:  Richard E Kast
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-16

7.  Expression and Prognostic Value of ARID5A and its Correlation With Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells in Glioma.

Authors:  Quan Zhou; Jinping Zhou; Jingyi Fan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hamza Ali; Romée Harting; Ralph de Vries; Meedie Ali; Thomas Wurdinger; Myron G Best
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Role of Neutrophils and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Glioma Progression and Treatment Resistance.

Authors:  Sabbir Khan; Sandeep Mittal; Kain McGee; Kristin D Alfaro-Munoz; Nazanin Majd; Veerakumar Balasubramaniyan; John F de Groot
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Anti-Ly6G binding and trafficking mediate positive neutrophil selection to unleash the anti-tumor efficacy of radiation therapy.

Authors:  Gaël Boivin; Pierre-Benoit Ancey; Romain Vuillefroy de Silly; Pradeep Kalambaden; Caroline Contat; Benoit Petit; Jonathan Ollivier; Jean Bourhis; Etienne Meylan; Marie-Catherine Vozenin
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 8.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.