| Literature DB >> 29928676 |
Nicole Ranson1, Mark Veldhuis2,3, Brent Mitchell2,3, Scott Fanning2,3, Anthony L Cook4, Dale Kunde1, Rajaraman Eri1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: CD, Crohn's disease; GC, goblet cell; IL, interleukin; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; UC, ulcerative colitis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29928676 PMCID: PMC6007817 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Demographic Data for Study Participants
| Patient category | Patients, n | Age, | Sex | Disease duration, |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control patients | 20 | 57 ± 14 | 11 F, 9 M | - |
| Paired UC | 30 | 50 ± 18 | 16 F, 14 M | 11 ± 12 |
| Quiescent UC only | 10 | 49 ± 11 | 6 F, 4 M | 15 ± 11 |
| Active UC only | 4 | 39 ± 21 | 2 F, 2 M | 11 ± 13 |
| Paired ileal CD | 6 | 41 ± 16 | 2 F, 4 M | 12 ± 8 |
| Active ileal CD only | 1 | 28 | 1 M | 15 |
| Paired colonic CD | 9 | 46 ± 15 | 4 F, 5 M | 8 ± 4 |
| Active colonic CD only | 1 | 46 | 1 F | 11 |
| Quiescent CD (includes ileal CD and colonic CD) only | 4 | 20 ± 7 | 3 F, 1 M | 9 ± 14 |
NOTE. All data are shown as means ± SD. The disease duration at the time of biopsy is shown for each group as the mean value ± SD. The average onset of disease can be calculated by subtracting the disease duration from the average age of the patient. Inflammatory bowel disease patients comprised 65 of the total 85 participants, and, of these, 35 were women and 30 were men. The mean age of inflammatory bowel disease patients providing paired biopsy specimens was slightly younger for the CD group (44 ± 16 y) than the UC group (50 ± 18 y). The mean age of the control group was 57 ± 14 years and comprised 11 women and 9 men.
F, females; M, males.
Patients had biopsy specimens taken from quiescent disease and active disease regions.
Figure 1The effect of disease activity and rosiglitazone treatment on the expression of NLRP6-related genes. (A–D) Paired colon biopsy specimens from quiescent (q) and active disease (a) in ileal CD (n = 6), colonic CD (n = 9), and UC patients (n = 30). Relative gene expression of individual biopsy specimens expressed as log10-fold change. Horizontal lines indicate the median relative expression and error bars represent the interquartile ranges. (E and F) Gene expression of NLRP6 and MUC2 in LS174T cells treated with rosiglitazone (5–50,000 nmol/L). Levels are relative to ethanol-treated control cells. Data are expressed as means ± SEM of 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate. The significance threshold was P < .05. Un, unstimulated.
Supplementary Figure 1Targeted RNA-sequencing analysis of inflammasome-related genes in CD biopsy specimens. (A) Targeted RNA-sequencing analysis of ileal CD biopsy specimens (n = 4) during active disease. Gene expression results are expressed as log 2 (fold change), normalized to housekeeping genes and relative to a normal control group (n = 4), which is indicated by the dotted vertical line. Up-regulated genes are shown as magenta, down-regulated genes are shown as black. (B) Targeted RNA-sequencing analysis of colonic CD biopsy specimens (n = 4) during active disease. Gene expression results are expressed as log 2 (fold change), normalized to housekeeping genes and relative to a normal control group (n = 4), which is indicated by the dotted vertical line. Up-regulated genes are shown as magenta, down-regulated genes are shown as black. NOD, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing.
Supplementary Figure 2Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images and quantification of NLRP6 and MUC2 expression in left colon biopsies. All biopsies were paraffin embedded, cut into 3-5 μm sections and incubated with NLRP6 (NBP2-31372, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CA) and MUC2 (H:300 sc-15334, Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, TX). Images were captured using DP21 microscope camera (Olympus Australia, Melbourne, Australia) attached to an IX71 microscope (Olympus). Images are 400X and scale bar = 50 μm. (A) Quantitative (Quant.) analysis of DAB staining in paraffin embedded left colon mucosal biopsies as analysed by IHC. (B) NLRP6 expression in sections from normal colon (number of images analysed = 18), active UC (n = 43), remission UC (Rem. UC, n = 20), active ileal CD (n = 34), active colonic CD (n = 18) and remission CD (Rem. CD, n = 12). (C) MUC2 expression in sections from normal colon (n = 20), active UC n = 62), remission UC (n = 20), active ileal CD (n = 24), active colonic CD (n = 30), and remission CD (n = 30). The optical intensity of DAB staining was determined using ImageJ software. All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was evaluated using Dunn's multiple comparison One-way ANOVA and the significance threshold was P < .05. Here we present contrasting expression patterns for both NLRP6 and MUC2. In active ileal CD, NLRP6 expression is localised to the epithelial cell layer, myofibroblasts, neutrophils and monocytic linage cells residing in the lamina propria. In active UC NLRP6 expression is limited to lamina propria immune cells and absent for the epithelial cell layer. Interestingly, in the normal colon, moderate cytoplasmic NLRP6 expression was present in the epithelial cell layer and scattered within the lamina propria cells. Quantitative analysis of NLRP6 IHC staining confirms the high NLRP6 expression observed in ileal CD (active ileal CD vs active colonic CD, P < .001; active ileal CD vs remission CD, P < .001). MUC2 expression in active IBD and the normal colon is highly variable in distribution and depth. In active CD, both colonic and ileal the expression of MUC2 is increased while in UC it is reduced. The reduced MUC2 expression in active UC is well established and consistent with previous studies in human derived material.[2-4] Interestingly, there was no change in MUC2 expression in ileal and colonic CD despite the increased NLRP6 in ileal CD. Quantitatively, the expression of MUC2 in active ileal CD was greater than in active UC (P = .002).
Figure 2The differential NLRP6 expression in ileal CD goblet cells and overlap of NLRP6/E-cadherin fluorescence signals. Representative immunofluorescence confocal images of NLRP6 (magenta), MUC2 (green), in (A) active ileal CD colon biopsy specimens and (B) normal colon biopsy specimens. Solidline indicates goblet cells with high NLRP6 expression. Dashed line indicates goblet cell with minimal NLRP6 expression. Representative immunofluorescence confocal images of NLRP6 (magenta) and E-cadherin (green) in (B) active ileal CD biopsy specimens and (D) normal colon biopsy specimens. Spatial profiling is indicated by the straight dotted line. Nuclei were stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue), original magnification for all images: 400×. Scale bars: 50 μm. Ecad, E-cadherin.
Supplementary Figure 3Representative immunofluorescence images of MUC2 localization in normal colon, active UC, and active ileal and colonic CD. All biopsy specimens were taken from the left colon, paraffin-embedded, cut into 5-μm sections, incubated with MUC2 (H:300: sc15334, 1:200 dilution; Santa Cruz), and visualized using Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (green). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, blue). Scale bars: 100 μm for both the 100× and 400× magnification. Here, we present immunofluorescence microscopy images showing the variations in MUC2 architecture. In CD, the MUC2 granules are highly organized and this structural organization is lacking in active UC and in the normal colon. Furthermore, colonic crypts normally contain smaller goblet cell theca containing less MUC2 in the lower crypts and larger MUC2-filled theca in the upper crypt. However, in active ileal CD and active colonic CD we observed large tightly packed theca containing MUC2 granules along the entire crypt length, and the overcrowding of goblet cells often was associated with crypt distortion.