Literature DB >> 29928444

Expression signature of ten genes predicts the survival of patients with estrogen receptor positive-breast cancer that were treated with tamoxifen.

He Huang1, Qiyu Chen1, Weijian Sun1, Mingdong Lu1, Yaojun Yu1, Zhiqiang Zheng1, Pihong Li1.   

Abstract

Although tamoxifen is the most frequently used drug for the treatment of estrogen receptor positive (ER+)-breast cancer (BRCA), its efficacy varies between patients. In the present study, Cox multivariate regression of the relative mRNA expression levels in two microarray-based datasets (GSE17005 and GSE26971) was employed to develop a risk score model to evaluate the outcome of patients with BRCA in the GSE17005 dataset. A total of ten genes were used to develop the prediction model for the survival of tamoxifen-treated patients with breast cancer. The survival time of patients in the low risk score group was significantly longer compared with patients in the high risk score group. This observation was validated in three other datasets (GSE26971, GSE22219 and GSE56884). The prognostic effect of the clinicopathological indicators and the risk score were tested with the 5-year event receiving operating characteristic curve, and the risk score had an improved prognostic value in patients with ER+-BRCA with an area under the curve value of 0.733 compared with the factors of age, tumor stage, tumor grade, chemotherapy, lymph invasion and tumor size. The risk score was significantly associated with the tumor-node-metastasis stage and grade, but was independent of age, sex, lymph invasion and tumor size. In summary, the risk model for breast cancer using the expression signature of ten genes may be an important indicator for predicting the survival of patients with ER+-breast cancer and treated with tamoxifen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; prognosis; tamoxifen

Year:  2018        PMID: 29928444      PMCID: PMC6006464          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  25 in total

1.  Identification of 20 genes aberrantly methylated in human breast cancers.

Authors:  Kazuaki Miyamoto; Takashi Fukutomi; Sadako Akashi-Tanaka; Tadashi Hasegawa; Toshimasa Asahara; Takashi Sugimura; Toshikazu Ushijima
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  FOXD1 promotes breast cancer proliferation and chemotherapeutic drug resistance by targeting p27.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Zhao; Jing-Yu Zhao; Hong Yue; Ke-Shi Hu; Hao Shen; Zheng-Gang Guo; Xiao-Jun Su
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Validation of a protein panel for the noninvasive detection of recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Selma Gogalic; Ursula Sauer; Sara Doppler; Andreas Heinzel; Paul Perco; Arno Lukas; Guy Simpson; Hardev Pandha; Andras Horvath; Claudia Preininger
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Too much covariates in a multivariable model may cause the problem of overfitting.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Decreased expression of ABAT and STC2 hallmarks ER-positive inflammatory breast cancer and endocrine therapy resistance in advanced disease.

Authors:  Maurice P H M Jansen; Leen Sas; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Caroline Van Cauwenberghe; Diana Ramirez-Ardila; Maxime Look; Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier; Pascal Finetti; François Bertucci; Mieke M Timmermans; Carolien H M van Deurzen; John W M Martens; Iris Simon; Paul Roepman; Sabine C Linn; Peter van Dam; Marleen Kok; Filip Lardon; Peter B Vermeulen; John A Foekens; Luc Dirix; Els M J J Berns; Steven Van Laere
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Flavia Morales-Vasquez; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  The Small C-terminal Domain Phosphatase 1 Inhibits Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion by Dephosphorylating Ser(P)68-Twist1 to Accelerate Twist1 Protein Degradation.

Authors:  Tong Sun; Junjiang Fu; Tao Shen; Xia Lin; Lan Liao; Xin-Hua Feng; Jianming Xu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Genetic variation in the JAK/STAT/SOCS signaling pathway influences breast cancer-specific mortality through interaction with cigarette smoking and use of aspirin/NSAIDs: the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Abbie Lundgreen; Lisa M Hines; Gabriela Torres-Mejia; Roger K Wolff; Mariana C Stern; Esther M John
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Association Between Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene Variations and Risk of Developing Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ezgi Oztas; Halil Kara; Zeliha Pala Kara; Manolya Uras Aydogan; Cihan Uras; Gul Ozhan
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2016-06-23

10.  The transcription levels and prognostic values of seven proteasome alpha subunits in human cancers.

Authors:  Yunhai Li; Jing Huang; Jiazheng Sun; Shili Xiang; Dejuan Yang; Xuedong Ying; Mengqi Lu; Hongzhong Li; Guosheng Ren
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Establishment of a novel CNV-related prognostic signature predicting prognosis in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Mingyue Li; Qi Zhang; Chuan Liu; Xinmei Wang; Jing Li; Shusheng Qiu; Liang Li
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 4.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.