| Literature DB >> 29928406 |
Abstract
The synergistic effects of docetaxel (DTX) combined with carboplatin in the treatment of retinoblastoma (RB) was explored in mouse RB xenografts compared with carboplatin alone and DTX alone groups. Retinoblastoma Y-79 cells (4.0×107/ml) were injected into the vitreous body of the right eye of mice to establish the mouse model of RB xenografts. Then the mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=30): DTX combined with carboplatin group (group A), carboplatin group (group B), DTX group (group C) and blank control group (group D). The changes in tumors, the survival time of mice, and the synergistic effects of DTX combined with carboplatin were observed and analyzed. The diameters and weight of the right eyeballs of the Institute for Cancer Research (ICR) mice were significantly larger and higher than those of the left eyeballs in each group, respectively (P<0.05). The diameters and weight in group A were significantly shorter and lighter than those in the other three groups, respectively (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference compared with that of normal eyeballs (P>0.05). There was no difference in diameter and weight between group B and group C (P>0.05), but the diameters and weight were shorter and lighter than those in group D, respectively (P<0.05). The survival time of ICR mice in groups A, B and C was significantly longer than that in group D (P<0.05). The survival time in group A was significantly longer than that in groups B and C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the survival time between the group B and group C (P>0.05). DTX, carboplatin and the combination of the two have significant inhibitory effects on RB; however, DTX combined with carboplatin has a better therapeutic effect on RB.Entities:
Keywords: animal experiment; carboplatin; docetaxel; drug combination therapy; retinoblastoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 29928406 PMCID: PMC6006455 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Basic conditions of the four groups of mice.
| Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | F value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (weeks old) | 8.1±0.4 | 8.5±0.2 | 8.4±0.3 | 8.6±0.1 | 0.632 | 0.899 |
| Body weight before the modeling (g) | 19.4±1.3 | 16.5±1.8 | 14.2±1.5 | 17.1±1.2 | 0.512 | 0.645 |
| Body weight after the modeling (g) | 29.8±1.2 | 22.4±1.3 | 27.6±2.5 | 26.1±1.6 | 0.589 | 0.785 |
Figure 1.Examination of eyeball diameter of ICR mice. Seven days after the modeling, ICR mice were sacrificed with CO2, and both eyes of the mice were collected. Diameters of the right eyeballs in ICR mice were found significantly larger than those of the left eyeballs (P<0.05), diameters of the affected eyeballs in group A were significantly shorter than those in the other three groups (*P<0.05), and there was no significant difference compared with normal left eyeballs (P>0.05); diameters in group B and group C were not different from each other (#P>0.05), but shorter than those in group D (P<0.05).
Figure 2.Comparisons of eyeball weight of ICR mice. The weight in group A was less than that in the other three groups (*P<0.05), and there was no significant difference compared with normal eyeball weight (P>0.05). There was no difference in weight between groups B and C (P>0.05), but the weight was less compared with that in group D (#P<0.05).
Figure 3.Comparisons of the survival time in ICR mice after treatment by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a log rank test. The survival time of ICR mice in group D was shorter than that in the other three groups (P<0.05), the survival time of ICR mice in group A was significantly longer than that in groups B and C (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the survival time of mice between groups B and C (P>0.05).