Literature DB >> 29927273

How prescriptive support affects weight loss in weight-loss intervention participants and their untreated spouses.

Talea Cornelius1, Katelyn Gettens2, Erin Lenz2, Alexis C Wojtanowski3, Gary D Foster3, Amy A Gorin2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Controlling or prescriptive support styles (e.g., pressure) often hinder weight loss, but can sometimes be beneficial. This secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial examined persuasion, pressure, and indirect social control among cohabiting couples and the effect of these supports on weight loss.
METHODS: Couples (NCouples = 130) were randomized to either Weight Watchers (WW) or a self-guided control condition (SG). Only one member of each couple received the intervention; the other member of the couple was untreated. Couples were weighed and completed study measures at baseline, 3, and 6 months.
RESULTS: Dyadic multilevel models examined BMI change and differences across role (treated participant/untreated spouse) and condition (WW/SG). Prescriptive support predicted BMI change for treated participants in the WW condition only. For treated WW participants, there was no significant decrease in BMI when pressure was high (+1SD), B = -.25, p = .22, but a significant decrease when pressure was low (0), B = -.96, p < .001. Additionally, high levels of indirect social control (+1SD) predicted greater decreases in BMI compared to low (-1SD) indirect social control, B = -.91, p < .001, and, B = -.41, p < .01.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering both the type and context of support for weight management is worthwhile. Intervention participants had access to treatment resources that may have engendered more effective responses to spouses' concerns or a sense of obligation to their spouse (indirect social control), whereas pressures to lose weight-while engaged in treatment-may have undermined behavior-change efforts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29927273      PMCID: PMC7384381          DOI: 10.1037/hea0000630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  31 in total

1.  Antecedents and reactions to health-related social control.

Authors:  Megan A Lewis; Rita M Butterfield
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2005-03

2.  Social pressure, coercion, and client engagement at treatment entry: a self-determination theory perspective.

Authors:  T Cameron Wild; John A Cunningham; Richard M Ryan
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Distinguishing autonomous and directive forms of goal support: their effects on goal progress, relationship quality, and subjective well-being.

Authors:  Richard Koestner; Theodore A Powers; Noémie Carbonneau; Marina Milyavskaya; Sook Ning Chua
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-08-27

4.  Spouses use of social control to improve diabetic patients' dietary adherence.

Authors:  Mary Ann Parris Stephens; Karen S Rook; Melissa M Franks; Cynthia Khan; Masumi Iida
Journal:  Fam Syst Health       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.950

5.  Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance.

Authors:  R R Wing; R W Jeffery
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-02

6.  Weight loss treatment influences untreated spouses and the home environment: evidence of a ripple effect.

Authors:  A A Gorin; R R Wing; J L Fava; J M Jakicic; R Jeffery; D S West; K Brelje; V G Dilillo
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years.

Authors:  Nicholas A Christakis; James H Fowler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Health-related social control within older adults' relationships.

Authors:  Joan S Tucker
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 9.  Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pedro J Teixeira; Eliana V Carraça; David Markland; Marlene N Silva; Richard M Ryan
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Influence of family, friend and coworker social support and social undermining on weight gain prevention among adults.

Authors:  Monica L Wang; Lori Pbert; Stephenie C Lemon
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  2 in total

1.  Partner presence in the emergency department and adherence to daily cardiovascular medications in patients evaluated for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Talea Cornelius; Jeffrey L Birk; Kyle Bourassa; Redeana C Umland; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-01-29

2.  Family members' experiences with adult participation in weight management programs: Triadic perspectives from patients, partners and children.

Authors:  Charlotte A Albright; Keeley J Pratt; Sarah B Martin; Hannah Hulshult; Callie L Brown; Kristina H Lewis; Joseph A Skelton
Journal:  Clin Obes       Date:  2020-01-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.