Literature DB >> 29926965

Asking different questions: A call to action for research to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child.

Holly P Kennedy1, Melissa Cheyney2, Hannah G Dahlen3, Soo Downe4, Maralyn J Foureur5, Caroline S E Homer5, Elaine Jefford6, Alison McFadden7, Michaela Michel-Schuldt5, Jane Sandall5,8, Hora Soltani9, Anna M Speciale10, Jennifer Stevens11, Saraswathi Vedam12, Mary J Renfrew7.   

Abstract

Despite decades of considerable economic investment in improving the health of families and newborns world-wide, aspirations for maternal and newborn health have yet to be attained in many regions. The global turn toward recognizing the importance of positive experiences of pregnancy, intrapartum and postnatal care, and care in the first weeks of life, while continuing to work to minimize adverse outcomes, signals a critical change in the maternal and newborn health care conversation and research prioritization. This paper presents "different research questions" drawing on evidence presented in the 2014 Lancet Series on Midwifery and a research prioritization study conducted with the World Health Organization. The results indicated that future research investment in maternal and newborn health should be on "right care," which is quality care that is tailored to individuals, weighs benefits and harms, is person-centered, works across the whole continuum of care, advances equity, and is informed by evidence, including cost-effectiveness. Three inter-related research themes were identified: examination and implementation of models of care that enhance both well-being and safety; investigating and optimizing physiological, psychological, and social processes in pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period; and development and validation of outcome measures that capture short and longer term well-being. New, transformative research approaches should account for the underlying social and political-economic mechanisms that enhance or constrain the well-being of women, newborns, families, and societies. Investment in research capacity and capability building across all settings is critical, but especially in those countries that bear the greatest burden of poor outcomes. We believe this call to action for investment in the three research priorities identified in this paper has the potential to achieve these benefits and to realize the ambitions of Sustainable Development Goal Three of good health and well-being for all.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  maternal and newborn health; quality of care; research priorities; sustainable development goals

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29926965     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  15 in total

1.  Giving patients a voice: implementing patient and public involvement to strengthen research in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Carol Bedwell; Tina Lavender
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Relation between Length of Exposure to Epidural Analgesia during Labour and Birth Mode.

Authors:  Laura Garcia-Lausin; Mercedes Perez-Botella; Xavier Duran; Maria Felisa Mamblona-Vicente; Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Martin; Eugenia Gómez de Enterria-Cuesta; Ramon Escuriet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Fuzzy cognitive mapping and soft models of indigenous knowledge on maternal health in Guerrero, Mexico.

Authors:  Ivan Sarmiento; Sergio Paredes-Solís; David Loutfi; Anna Dion; Anne Cockcroft; Neil Andersson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  What are the Critical Elements of Satisfaction and Experience in Labor and Childbirth-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Barbara Baranowska; Anna Kajdy; Paulina Pawlicka; Ernest Pokropek; Michał Rabijewski; Dorota Sys; Artur Pokropek
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The role of evaluation in iterative learning and implementation of quality of care interventions.

Authors:  Nikhil Shah; Sharon Mathew; Amanda Pereira; April Nakaima; Sanjeev Sridharan
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.640

6.  How do women with social risk factors experience United Kingdom maternity care? A realist synthesis.

Authors:  Hannah Rayment-Jones; James Harris; Angela Harden; Zahra Khan; Jane Sandall
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.689

Review 7.  Sustaining quality midwifery care in a pandemic and beyond.

Authors:  Mary J Renfrew; Helen Cheyne; Justine Craig; Elizabeth Duff; Fiona Dykes; Billie Hunter; Tina Lavender; Lesley Page; Mary Ross-Davie; Helen Spiby; Soo Downe
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Maternal pre and perinatal experiences with their full-term, preterm and very preterm newborns.

Authors:  Joana L Gonçalves; Marina Fuertes; Maria João Alves; Sandra Antunes; Ana Rita Almeida; Rute Casimiro; Margarida Santos
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Factors influencing maternal health in indigenous communities with presence of traditional midwifery in the Americas: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Iván Sarmiento; Sergio Paredes-Solís; Martin Morris; Juan Pimentel; Anne Cockcroft; Neil Andersson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.