Literature DB >> 29926435

A Survey Regarding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Graduates of Cancer Rehabilitation Fellowship Program.

Rajesh R Yadav1, An T Ngo-Huang2, Jack B Fu2, Amy Ng2, Christian Custodio3, Eduardo Bruera2.   

Abstract

Currently there are limited options for physiatrists to further subspecialize in cancer rehabilitation. Since 2007, few cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs have been started. There is currently absolutely no information about such training programs and their graduates. This study is the first to survey a small number of graduates from two cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs. The purpose of this study was to report characteristics, attitudes, and beliefs of cancer rehabilitation fellowship graduates. Graduates of cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs from 2008 through 2015 responded to a 26-question survey. Information collected included exposure to cancer rehabilitation prior to fellowship training, usefulness of fellowship training program, information about current practice, and suggested areas of improvement. The setting of the study is online survey. Participants were graduates of two cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs from 2008 through 2015. Participants were contacted via email about completion of an online survey and information was collected anonymously. Primary outcome measure was satisfaction of respondents with their fellowship training program in meeting the rehabilitation needs of their cancer patients. Sixteen responses, with a response rate of 89%, were recorded. Sixty-three percent of the respondents had exposure to cancer rehabilitation prior to post-graduate year 3 (PGY-3). Majority of graduates had practice involving at least 50% of care to cancer patients. Fifty percent indicated that their position was specifically created after their job interview. Career development was one of the major areas of suggested improvement in training. Graduates of cancer rehabilitation fellowship programs strongly value their training. Majority of the graduates were able to continue their career into jobs that were primarily cancer rehabilitation related. Further work needs to be done to define this subspecialty further and incorporate building practice as part of this training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Education; Fellowship; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29926435     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1385-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  6 in total

Review 1.  A vision for the National Cancer Program in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew C von Eschenbach
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Cancer rehabilitation.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Cancer rehabilitation education during physical medicine and rehabilitation residency: preliminary data regarding the quality and quantity of experiences.

Authors:  Vishwa S Raj; Jamal Balouch; James H Norton
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 4.  The future of cancer rehabilitation: emerging subspecialty.

Authors:  Gail L Gamble; Lynn H Gerber; Gayle R Spill; Kelly L Paul
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 5.  Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: an essential component of quality care and survivorship.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Jennifer Baima; R Samuel Mayer
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Cancer rehabilitation: assessment of need, development, and evaluation of a model of care.

Authors:  J F Lehmann; J A DeLisa; C G Warren; B J deLateur; P L Bryant; C G Nicholson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.966

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Training and Practice Patterns in Cancer Rehabilitation: A Survey of Physiatrists Specializing in Oncology Care.

Authors:  Raman Sharma; Diana Molinares-Mejia; Ashish Khanna; Susan Maltser; Lisa Ruppert; Sarah Wittry; Ryan Murphy; Anne Felicia Ambrose; Julie K Silver
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  Utilizing a Team Kinesiology Model to Support Rehabilitative Care in Patients.

Authors:  Paulette M Yamada; Joe Priest
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.