Alice L Pong1, Susan E Beekmann2, Mekleet M Faltamo3, Philip M Polgreen2, Andi L Shane4. 1. 1Rady Children's Hospital,San Diego,California. 2. 3Department of Internal Medicine,Carver College of Medicine,University of Iowa,Iowa City,Iowa. 3. 4Emory University College of Arts and Sciences,Atlanta,Georgia. 4. 6Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases,Department of Pediatrics,Emory University School of Medicine,Atlanta,Georgia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To delineate the timing of, indications for, and assessment of visitor restriction policies and practices (VRPP) in pediatric facilities. DESIGN: An electronic survey to characterize VRPP in pediatric healthcare facilities. METHODS: The Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network surveyed 334 pediatric infectious disease consultants via an electronic link. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 170 eligible respondents completed a survey between 12 July and August 15, 2016, for a 51% response rate. Of the 104 respondents (61%) familiar with their VRPP, 92 (88%) had VRPP in all inpatient units. The respondents reported age-based VRPP (74%) symptom-based VRPP (97%), and outbreak-specific VRPP (75%). Symptom-based VRPP were reported to be seasonal by 24% of respondents and to be implemented year-round according to 70% of respondents. According to the respondents, communication of VRPP to families occurred at admission (87%) and through signage in care areas (64%), while communication of VRPP to staff occurred by email (77%), by meetings (55%), and by signage in staff-only areas (49%). Respondents reported that enforcement of VRPP was the responsibility of nursing (80%), registration clerks (58%), unit clerks (53%), the infection prevention team (31%), or clinicians 16 (16%). They also reported that the effectiveness of VRPP was assessed through active surveillance of hospital acquired respiratory infections (62%), through active surveillance of healthcare worker exposures (28%) and through patient/family satisfaction assessments (29%). CONCLUSION: Visitor restriction policies and practices vary in scope, implementation, enforcement, and physician awareness in pediatric facilities. A prospective multisite evaluation of outcomes would facilitate the adoption of uniform guidance.
OBJECTIVE: To delineate the timing of, indications for, and assessment of visitor restriction policies and practices (VRPP) in pediatric facilities. DESIGN: An electronic survey to characterize VRPP in pediatric healthcare facilities. METHODS: The Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network surveyed 334 pediatric infectious disease consultants via an electronic link. Descriptive analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 170 eligible respondents completed a survey between 12 July and August 15, 2016, for a 51% response rate. Of the 104 respondents (61%) familiar with their VRPP, 92 (88%) had VRPP in all inpatient units. The respondents reported age-based VRPP (74%) symptom-based VRPP (97%), and outbreak-specific VRPP (75%). Symptom-based VRPP were reported to be seasonal by 24% of respondents and to be implemented year-round according to 70% of respondents. According to the respondents, communication of VRPP to families occurred at admission (87%) and through signage in care areas (64%), while communication of VRPP to staff occurred by email (77%), by meetings (55%), and by signage in staff-only areas (49%). Respondents reported that enforcement of VRPP was the responsibility of nursing (80%), registration clerks (58%), unit clerks (53%), the infection prevention team (31%), or clinicians 16 (16%). They also reported that the effectiveness of VRPP was assessed through active surveillance of hospital acquired respiratory infections (62%), through active surveillance of healthcare worker exposures (28%) and through patient/family satisfaction assessments (29%). CONCLUSION: Visitor restriction policies and practices vary in scope, implementation, enforcement, and physician awareness in pediatric facilities. A prospective multisite evaluation of outcomes would facilitate the adoption of uniform guidance.
Authors: W Matthew Linam; Elizabeth M Marrero; Michele D Honeycutt; Christy M Wisdom; Anna Gaspar; Vini Vijayan Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2019-12-16