| Literature DB >> 29925420 |
Francis W B Sanders1, Animesh Acharjee1,2, Celia Walker1, Luke Marney1, Lee D Roberts1,2,3, Fumiaki Imamura4, Benjamin Jenkins1, Jack Case2, Sumantra Ray1,5, Samuel Virtue6, Antonio Vidal-Puig6, Diana Kuh7, Rebecca Hardy7, Michael Allison8, Nita Forouhi4, Andrew J Murray9, Nick Wareham4, Michele Vacca1,2,5,6, Albert Koulman1, Julian L Griffin10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diet is a major contributor to metabolic disease risk, but there is controversy as to whether increased incidences of diseases such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease arise from consumption of saturated fats or free sugars. Here, we investigate whether a sub-set of triacylglycerols (TAGs) were associated with hepatic steatosis and whether they arise from de novo lipogenesis (DNL) from the consumption of carbohydrates.Entities:
Keywords: De novo lipogenesis; Direct infusion mass spectrometry; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Triacylglycerols; Triglycerides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29925420 PMCID: PMC6009819 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1439-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol ISSN: 1474-7596 Impact factor: 13.583
Fig. 1High-resolution direct infusion mass spectrometry (DI-MS) of blood plasma from the Fenland cohort. a High-resolution mass spectrum from a typical blood plasma sample analysed by DI-MS. chol cholesterol, lyso-PC lysophophatidylcholines, DAG diacylglycerols, CE cholesterol esters, PC phosphatidylcholines, SM sphingomyelins, TAG triacylglycerols b Principal component analysis (PCA) of samples from the Fenland cohort (green circles) and pooled quality control samples (red circles) before normalisation. c As (b) but following batch correction normalising the total intensity of QC samples across the 19 96-well-plates used to analyse the samples from Fenland. d Hopkin’s statistic of individual lipid classes reveals that only TAGs have significant substructure in the Fenland dataset. The critical value is displayed as a dashed red line. CE cholesterol esters. PE phosphatidylethanolamines, LPC lysophosphatidylcholines, SM sphingolipids, PC phosphatidylcholines, TG triacylglcerols
Fig. 2Examining the distribution of triacylglycerols (TAGs) in Fenland and National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD) cohorts. a Bayesian Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (B-HCA) of the TAG distributions as measured by DI-MS in the Fenland cohort. Relative intensities are shown of the major three clusters. TAGs are identified by total number of carbons in the fatty acid side chains: total number of double bonds in the fatty acid side chains. b Pie chart of the relative distribution of different TAGs in the Fenland cohort. c B-HCA of the TAG distributions as measured by DI-MS in the NSHD cohort. Relative intensities are shown of the major 3/4 clusters. d Pie chart of the relative distribution of different TAGs in the NSHD cohort
Fig. 3a Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) of individuals with (blue) and without (green) hepatic steatosis as assessed by fatty liver index. b Permutation validation of the plot in (a). R2 and Q2 values to the left of the plot are from random models compared with the values for the true model on the right. c S-plot of discriminatory metabolites in (a). Metabolites are coloured according to lipid class. d OPLS-DA of individuals with (yellow) and without (green) hepatic steatosis as assessed by ultrasound. e Permutation validation of the plot in (d). R2 and Q2 values to the left of the plot are from random models compared with the values for the true model on the right. f S-plot of discriminatory metabolites in (d). Metabolites are coloured according to lipid class. CE cholesterol ester, DG diacylglycerol, lyso-PC lyso-phosphatidylcholine, PC phosphatidylcholine, PE phosphatidylethanolamine, TAG triacylglycerol, SM sphingomyelin. g OPLS-DA scores plot of the TAG profile of individuals with (yellow) and without (green) hepatic steatosis as assessed by ultrasound. h S-plot of discriminatory TAGs in (g)
Comparison of key anthropometric data for those with and without hepatic steatosis as measured by ultrasound in the Fenland cohort. A Student’s t-test was used to compare parameters between the two groups
| Non-steatosis | Steatosis | |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals assessed by ultrasound (n) | 663 | 233 |
| Women (n (%)) | 424 (64.0) | 110 (47.2) |
| Age (years) | 45 ± 7 | 48 ± 7*** |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.5 ± 3.7 | 30.7 ± 4.8*** |
| Fat mass (kg) | 24.2 ± 7.5 | 33.8 ± 9.5*** |
| Liver score | 3.66 ± 0.47 | 6.06 ± 1.20*** |
| Fasting plasma insulin (pmol/L) | 37.9 ± 23.0 | 68.0 ± 49.4*** |
| Fasting plasma NEFAs (μM) | 355 ± 179 | 369 ± 181 |
| Alcohol consumption (g/d) | 9.4 ± 12.3 | 10.5 ± 14.1 |
| Total carbohydrate consumption | 243 ± 106 | 237 ± 89 |
| Fasting blood glucose (mM) | 4.78 ± 0.59 | 5.12 ± 0.74*** |
| Fasting blood triglyceride (mM) | 1.03 ± 0.65 | 1.70 ± 0.64*** |
| HOMA-IR | 0.80 ± 0.49 | 1.45 ± 1.04*** |
| Fatty Liver Index | 31.1 ± 25.4 | 70.0 ± 24.4*** |
***p < 0.001
Fig. 4a Hepatic TAG changes associated with high fat or regular chow feeding in ob/ob mice. Using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to assess the changes in the TAGs within the murine liver demonstrates a shift toward a higher proportion of TAGs with fewer double bonds and carbon atoms when fed regular chow than when fed a high fat diet. Each point’s area reflects the Variable Importance Parameter score for the PLS-DA model. b A simple linear model of the summated TAG Fenland cluster 3 signal against calculated de novo synthesised palmitate. Plotting the total normalised TAG cluster 3 signal against the total palmitate calculated to be synthesised from DNL using deuterium incorporation revealed a significant positive correlation between the two measurements (R2 = 0.82, p < 1*10−5). c Plasma TAG changes before and after a high carbohydrate meal. Using PLS-DA to assess the changes in the TAGs within the plasma lipidome demonstrates a shift toward a higher proportion of TAGs with fewer double bonds and carbon atoms 3.5 h after the high carbohydrate meal compared to before the meal in the fasting state. Each point’s area reflects the Variable Importance Parameter score for the PLS-DA model. d A simple linear model of the summated TAG Fenland cluster 3 signal against calculated de novo synthesised palmitate. Plotting the total normalised TAG cluster 3 signal against the proportion of palmitate calculated to be synthesised from DNL using deuterium incorporation revealed a significant positive correlation between the two measurements (R2 = 0.89, p < 5*10−6)
Fig. 5a Body mass of mice over the duration of the dietary intervention. WT mice fed low fat chow (LFC) were significantly lighter than those fed a Western diet (WD) from 6 weeks onward (p < 0.05; n = 8). b Histological assessment of hepatic steatosis. Masson’s trichrome stained sections were used for histological analysis and lipid content assessed as the average percentage of the hepatic tissue that appeared as unstained lipid droplets. Mice fed a LFC diet had significantly lower lipid content than mice fed WD. Mean ± SEM analysed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. c Overall quantity of DNL synthesised palmitate. Mice fed a WD demonstrate significantly increased production of palmitate compared to those fed LFC. Mean ± SEM analysed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. d LC-MS analysis of intact TAGs within the liver and blood plasma. TAGs that were significantly increased in each group were plotted by number of carbon atoms against number of double bonds within the FA moieties, when compared pairwise using PLS-DA with a VIP > 1 being taken as significant
Characteristics of cohort of biopsy-proven NASH patients
| Steatosis 0–1 | Steatosis 2–3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 40 | 36 | / |
| M/F | 22/18 | 24/12 | NS |
| Age (years) | 58.5 ± 1.7 | 53.6 ± 1.9 | NS (0.06) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.6 ± 0.6 | 32.6 ± 0.9 | NS |
| Metabolic assessment | |||
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 6.2 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.4 | NS (0.1) |
| Insulin (pmol/L) | 109.6 ± 11.0 | 130.7 ± 12.6 | NS |
| HOMA2-IR | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | NS |
| TAGs (mmol/L) | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | NS |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.1 | NS |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | NS |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.03 | NS |
| Liver function tests | |||
| AST (U/L) | 41.5 ± 3.8 | 46.7 ± 3.9 | NS |
| ALT (U/L) | 53.02 ± 3.9 | 72.9 ± 6.3 |
|
| ALP (U/L) | 118.4 ± 9.5 | 104.1 ± 6.7 | NS |
| Histology | |||
| NASH activity score | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.2 |
|
| - Steatosis | 0.8 ± 0.02 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
|
| - Ballooning | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
|
| - Inflammation | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | NS |
| Fibrosis | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | NS |
* p < 0.05
Fig. 6a Boxplots of the relative intensities of triacylglycerols TAG(50:1) and TAG(48:1) in blood plasma of patients with biopsy confirmed NASH separated according to ‘steatosis’ component of the NAFLD Activity score. No steatosis: score of 0 or 1, steatosis: score of 2 or 3. b Heat map of the correlation of the most discriminatory lipids between those with a low steatosis score (0 or 1) or high steatosis score (2 or 3). TG triacylglycerol, PC phosphatidylcholine, PI phosphatidylinositol, DG diacylglycerol
Comparison of the two cohorts used in the manuscript. Fenland and the National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD) are UK prospective cohort studies. Fenland (http://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/research/studies/fenland/) investigates the interaction between environmental and genetic factors in determining obesity, type 2 diabetes and related metabolic disorders. NSHD (http://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk) is a British birth cohort study investigating the social and biological factors that affect lifelong health, ageing and the development of chronic disease risk
| Analysis of the sub-cohort of Fenland | NSHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Individuals (n) | 1507 | 1701 |
| Hepatic steatosis assessed by ultrasound (n) | 901 | Not determined |
| Hepatic steatosis assessed by Fatty Liver Index (n) | 1507 | Not determined |
| Women (%) | 55.8 | 52.1 |
| Age (years) | 45 ± 7 | 62 ± 2 |
| Fasting blood triglyceride (mM) | 1.22 ± 0.84 | 1.08 ± 0.10 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.0 ± 4.8 | 27.6 ± 4.5 |