Literature DB >> 29924496

Intrasexually selected weapons.

Alejandro Rico-Guevara1,2,3, Kristiina J Hurme1,2.   

Abstract

We propose a practical concept that distinguishes the particular kind of weaponry that has evolved to be used in combat between individuals of the same species and sex, which we term intrasexually selected weapons (ISWs). We present a treatise of ISWs in nature, aiming to understand their distinction and evolution from other secondary sex traits, including from 'sexually selected weapons', and from sexually dimorphic and monomorphic weaponry. We focus on the subset of secondary sex traits that are the result of same-sex combat, defined here as ISWs, provide not previously reported evolutionary patterns, and offer hypotheses to answer questions such as: why have only some species evolved weapons to fight for the opposite sex or breeding resources? We examined traits that seem to have evolved as ISWs in the entire animal phylogeny, restricting the classification of ISW to traits that are only present or enlarged in adults of one of the sexes, and are used as weapons during intrasexual fights. Because of the absence of behavioural data and, in many cases, lack of sexually discriminated series from juveniles to adults, we exclude the fossil record from this review. We merge morphological, ontogenetic, and behavioural information, and for the first time thoroughly review the tree of life to identify separate evolution of ISWs. We found that ISWs are only found in bilateral animals, appearing independently in nematodes, various groups of arthropods, and vertebrates. Our review sets a reference point to explore other taxa that we identify with potential ISWs for which behavioural or morphological studies are warranted. We establish that most ISWs come in pairs, are located in or near the head, are endo- or exoskeletal modifications, are overdeveloped structures compared with those found in females, are modified feeding structures and/or locomotor appendages, are most common in terrestrial taxa, are frequently used to guard females, territories, or both, and are also used in signalling displays to deter rivals and/or attract females. We also found that most taxa lack ISWs, that females of only a few species possess better-developed weapons than males, that the cases of independent evolution of ISWs are not evenly distributed across the phylogeny, and that animals possessing the most developed ISWs have non-hunting habits (e.g. herbivores) or are faunivores that prey on very small prey relative to their body size (e.g. insectivores). Bringing together perspectives from studies on a variety of taxa, we conceptualize that there are five ways in which a sexually dimorphic trait, apart from the primary sex traits, can be fixed: sexual selection, fecundity selection, parental role division, differential niche occupation between the sexes, and interference competition. We discuss these trends and the factors involved in the evolution of intrasexually selected weaponry in nature.
© 2018 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  agonistic behaviour; animal armaments; exaggerated traits; intrasexual combat; male-male competition; secondary sexual weapons; sex-specific weapons

Year:  2018        PMID: 29924496     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  11 in total

1.  Muscle mass drives cost in sexually selected arthropod weapons.

Authors:  Devin M O'Brien; Romain P Boisseau; Meghan Duell; Erin McCullough; Erin C Powell; Ummat Somjee; Sarah Solie; Anthony J Hickey; Gregory I Holwell; Christina J Painting; Douglas J Emlen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sex roles and the evolution of parental care specialization.

Authors:  Jonathan M Henshaw; Lutz Fromhage; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Layered roles of fruitless isoforms in specification and function of male aggression-promoting neurons in Drosophila.

Authors:  Margot Wohl; Kenichi Ishii; Kenta Asahina
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Genetic relatedness and morphology as drivers of interspecific dominance hierarchy in hummingbirds.

Authors:  Ubaldo Márquez-Luna; Carlos Lara; Pablo Corcuera; Pedro Luis Valverde
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.061

5.  Weapon performance drives weapon evolution.

Authors:  Zachary Emberts; Wei Song Hwang; John J Wiens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Shifting Paradigms in the Mechanics of Nectar Extraction and Hummingbird Bill Morphology.

Authors:  A Rico-Guevara; M A Rubega; K J Hurme; R Dudley
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2019-01-02

7.  Dual function and associated costs of a highly exaggerated trait in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Sina J Rometsch; Julián Torres-Dowdall; Gonzalo Machado-Schiaffino; Nidal Karagic; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Runaway evolution from male-male competition.

Authors:  Allen J Moore; Joel W McGlothlin; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 11.274

9.  Evaluation of Body Size Indicators for Morphological Analyses in Two Sister Species of Genus Dorcus (Coleoptera, Lucanidae).

Authors:  Itsuki Ohtsu; Yasuhiko Chikami; Taichi Umino; Hiroki Gotoh
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.066

10.  Killing conspecific adults in mammals.

Authors:  José María Gómez; Miguel Verdú; Adela González-Megías
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.