Literature DB >> 29924428

A New Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FREM) Based on Public Health Registries.

Katrine Hass Rubin1, Sören Möller1, Teresa Holmberg2, Mette Bliddal1, Jens Søndergaard3, Bo Abrahamsen1,4.   

Abstract

Some conditions are already known to be associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Other conditions may also be significant indicators of increased risk. The aim of the current study was to identify conditions for inclusion in a fracture prediction model (fracture risk evaluation model [FREM]) for automated case finding of high-risk individuals of hip or major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs). We included the total population of Denmark aged 45+ years (N = 2,495,339). All hospital diagnoses from 1998 to 2012 were used as possible conditions; the primary outcome was MOFs during 2013. Our cohort was split randomly 50/50 into a development and a validation dataset for deriving and validating the predictive model. We applied backward selection on ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision) by logistic regression to develop an age-adjusted and sex-stratified model. The FREM for MOFs included 38 and 43 risk factors for women and men, respectively. Testing FREM for MOFs in the validation cohort showed good accuracy; it produced receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.750 (95% CI, 0.741 to 0.795) and 0.752 (95% CI, 0.743 to 0.761) for women and men, respectively. The FREM for hip fractures included 32 risk factors for both genders and showed an even higher accuracy in the validation cohort as AUCs of 0.874 (95% CI, 0.869 to 0.879) and 0.851 (95% CI, 0.841 to 0.861) for women and men were found, respectively. We have developed and tested a prediction model (FREM) for identifying men and women at high risk of MOFs or hip fractures by using solely existing administrative data. The FREM could be employed either at the point of care integrated into electronic patient record systems to alert physicians or deployed centrally in a national case-finding strategy where patients at high fracture risk could be invited to a focused DXA program.
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUTOMATED RISK CALCULATION; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PREDICTION MODELS; REGISTER DATA

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29924428     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

1.  Evaluating the performance of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in fracture risk prediction and developing a new Charlson Fracture Index (CFI): a register-based cohort study.

Authors:  A Clausen; S Möller; M K Skjødt; B H Bech; K H Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Prediction of imminent fracture risk in Canadian women and men aged 45 years or older: external validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM).

Authors:  Sören Möller; Michael K Skjødt; Lin Yan; Bo Abrahamsen; Lisa M Lix; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; John A Kanis; Katrine Hass Rubin; William D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Prediction Models for Osteoporotic Fractures Risk: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.

Authors:  Xuemei Sun; Yancong Chen; Yinyan Gao; Zixuan Zhang; Lang Qin; Jinlu Song; Huan Wang; Irene Xy Wu
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.968

Review 4.  Population-Based Osteoporosis Primary Prevention and Screening for Quality of Care in Osteoporosis, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Digital health interventions for osteoporosis and post-fragility fracture care.

Authors:  Amit Gupta; Christina Maslen; Madhavi Vindlacheruvu; Richard L Abel; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Juliet E Compston; Nicola Crabtree; Jennifer S Gregory; Eleni P Kariki; Nicholas C Harvey; Eugene McCloskey; Kate A Ward; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  Can National Registries Contribute to Predict the Risk of Cancer? The Cancer Risk Assessment Model (CRAM).

Authors:  Dorte E Jarbøl; Nana Hyldig; Sören Möller; Sonja Wehberg; Sanne Rasmussen; Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam; Peter F Haastrup; Jens Søndergaard; Katrine H Rubin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  Osteoporotic Fractures in the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.390

Review 8.  Management of patients at very high risk of osteoporotic fractures through sequential treatments.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Jean-Yves Reginster; Nasser Al-Daghri; Emmanuel Biver; Maria Luisa Brandi; Etienne Cavalier; Peyman Hadji; Philippe Halbout; Nicholas C Harvey; Mickaël Hiligsmann; M Kassim Javaid; John A Kanis; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Olivier Lamy; Radmila Matijevic; Adolfo Diez Perez; Régis Pierre Radermecker; Mário Miguel Rosa; Thierry Thomas; Friederike Thomasius; Mila Vlaskovska; René Rizzoli; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.