Letícia Pargendler Peres1, Fabiana Bazanella Oliveira2, André Cartell3, Nicolle Gollo Mazzotti2, Tania Ferreira Cestari2. 1. Clinic of Dermatology Pargendler, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 2. Service of Dermatology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. 3. Service of Pathology, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic and prevalent disease, and the associated pruritus is a common, difficult-to-control symptom. The mediators involved in psoriatic pruritus have not been fully established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between the number of mast cells in psoriatic lesions and the intensity of pruritus. METHODS: 29 patients with plaque psoriasis were recruited. In all participants, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Body Surface Area were assessed. A questionnaire was administered to obtain clinical information and the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Pruritus was assessed using a visual analog scale and skin biopsies were performed for staining with Giemsa and Immunohistochemistry with C-Kit. RESULTS: Pruritus was observed in 91.3% of our patients. Median VAS was 6 (p25-75: 2-8). The immunohistochemical method revealed a mean of 11.32 mast cells/field and Giemsa staining revealed a mean of 6.72 mast cells/field. There was no correlation between the intensity of pruritus and mast cell count, neither in Immunohistochemistry (p = 0.15; rho = -0.27) nor in Giemsa (p = 0.16; rho = -0.27). Pruritus did not impact on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (p = 0.51; rho = -0.13). STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small sample size may be considered the main limitation of our study. CONCLUSIONS: Although mast cells are mediators of pruritus in many cutaneous diseases, our findings support that psoriatic pruritus is a complex disorder with multifactorial, complex pathophysiology, involving pruritogenic mediators others than mast cells.
BACKGROUND:Psoriasis is a chronic and prevalent disease, and the associated pruritus is a common, difficult-to-control symptom. The mediators involved in psoriatic pruritus have not been fully established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between the number of mast cells in psoriatic lesions and the intensity of pruritus. METHODS: 29 patients with plaque psoriasis were recruited. In all participants, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Body Surface Area were assessed. A questionnaire was administered to obtain clinical information and the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Pruritus was assessed using a visual analog scale and skin biopsies were performed for staining with Giemsa and Immunohistochemistry with C-Kit. RESULTS:Pruritus was observed in 91.3% of our patients. Median VAS was 6 (p25-75: 2-8). The immunohistochemical method revealed a mean of 11.32 mast cells/field and Giemsa staining revealed a mean of 6.72 mast cells/field. There was no correlation between the intensity of pruritus and mast cell count, neither in Immunohistochemistry (p = 0.15; rho = -0.27) nor in Giemsa (p = 0.16; rho = -0.27). Pruritus did not impact on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (p = 0.51; rho = -0.13). STUDY LIMITATIONS: The small sample size may be considered the main limitation of our study. CONCLUSIONS: Although mast cells are mediators of pruritus in many cutaneous diseases, our findings support that psoriatic pruritus is a complex disorder with multifactorial, complex pathophysiology, involving pruritogenic mediators others than mast cells.
Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory and immune-mediated condition, with a prevalence
of 1-3% in Western countries.[1,2] Pruritus is seen in 70% to 90% of
patients with psoriasis.[3-6] Despite being a very frequent
symptom, pathophysiology of pruritus in psoriasis it is not yet
understood.[7] Many studies
demonstrate increased expression of substance P in psoriasis plaques, being this
substance also implicated in the inflammatory and proliferative process of other
skin conditions.[8]The presence of mast cells in established plaques and in early lesions of psoriasis
has been documented in many studies, with the increase in number and the early
activation of cutaneous mast cells typical findings of psoriatic
inflammation.[9-13] One of the early morphological
changes observed is mast cell degranulation.[14,15] In active lesions
and in nonaffected skin of patients with psoriasis, mast cell degranulation is
associated to vascular changes and angiogenesis.[14,16] Both phenomena
are vitally important in the pathophysiology of psoriasis.[17]Cutaneous innervation is increased in the skin with psoriasis and pruritus compared
to the skin with no pruritus.[18]
The increased innervation can worsen the intensity of the symptom in psoriasispatients with inflammation,[19] what
can explain the higher incidence of pruritus in the phases when the disease is more
active. Changes in dermal vasculature secondary to the release of histamine by mast
cells, in psoriasis lesions can maybe have an important role in the pathophysiology
of pruritus in psoriasis.[7]The majority of patients incriminates stress as a triggering factor for both
psoriasis lesions and the pruritus associated to the condition.[3,18] The mechanism by which stress triggers pruritus in psoriasis is
not clear, however, it is known that emotional stress changes the levels of certain
neuropeptides like substance P, either in the CNS or in the tissues.[20] Substance P, besides being one of
the most potent endogenous pruritogenic peptides, when increased in situations of
stress, can lead to mast cell degranulation.[20,21]There are few studies regarding the quantification of mast cells in psoriasis
lesions. This is one of the few studies that proposes to evaluate the relationship
between the amount of mast cells in psoriasis lesions with the intensity of the
pruritus.
METHODS
It is a cross-sectional study design, conducted from April to December 2013. During
this period, patients 18 years of age or older, with psoriasis vulgaris who were
patients at the ambulatory of psoriasis of the service of dermatology at Hospital de
Clínicas de Porto Alegre were invited to participate in the study. The
sampling was performed by convenience, with 29 patients included in the study after
the eligibility criteria. Were considered exclusion criteria: patients taking
medications that induce mast cell degranulation, pregnancy and patients being
treated with phototherapy.The research was approved by the ethics committee in research of the Universidade
Federal do Rio Grande do Sul under the protocol number 13-0128. All patients
included in the study signed an informed consent form.Patients filled out questionnaires: one for the evaluation of the clinical and
epidemiological characteristics such as sex, age, time of evolution of psoriasis,
family history of psoriasis, comorbidities, use of medications, alcohol intake and
smoking; the other was to assess the impact of psoriasis in the quality of life
through the DLQI. The intensity of the pruritus in the last 24 hours was estimated
with the VAS, and the PASI and BSA with the dermatological examination.After clinical evaluation, the patient underwent a 4mm punch skin biopsy in an area
with an active lesion of psoriasis. Skin samples were fixated in formalin, embedded
into paraffin blocks and stained with GIEMSA and C-Kit (CD-117). Mast cell density
was analyzed by a single pathologist on the optical microscopy with a 40x power. At
least three fields were examined and the main number of mast cells calculated for
each of the two staining methods.The collected data were inserted into an Excel 2007 spreadsheet, and statistical
tests were performed with the program SPSS version 18.0. The comparison of
symmetrical quantitative variables was performed with the Student’s t-test or ANOVA
test, depending of the categories evaluated, and were correlated by Spearman’s
correlation coefficient. Those with asymmetrical distribution were compared by the
Mann-Whitney test and the categorical by the Fisher’s exact test. The concordance
between the staining methods for the evaluation of mast cells was performed by the
Bland and Altman technique and evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient
(ICC) for perfect concordance (random two-way).[22] A level of significance of 5% was considered.
RESULTS
Clinical and epidemiological characteristics
Of the 29 patients participating in the study, 44.8% were male and 55.2% female,
with a mean age of 50 years. Of those, 89.7% were Caucasian. Median time of the
disease was of 18 years (Ir 11-30.5) and family history of psoriasis
was present in 37.9% of those studied.Most patients (65.5%) had been using some type of medication for the treatment of
psoriasis: 20.7% were using methotrexate (MTX), 6.9% acitretin, 58.6% topical
steroids and 17.2% formulations with liquor carbonis detergens (LCD) and
salicylic acid (SA).The population of the study was very diverse in regards to PASI, BSA, DLQI and
VAS. According to what is shown on table
1, we can observe that the median PASI was 7.6 (p25-75: 5.35-25.05),
DLQI was 5 (p25-75: 2.5-12.5) and VAS was 6 (p25-75: 2-8).
Table 1
Description of the maximum and minimum values, median and interquartile
interval of the variables PASI, BSA, DLQI, VAS
Minimum
Maximum
Median
Percentiles
(25-75)
PASI
1.8
29.30
7.6
5.35-25.05
BSA
1
76
17
10-29.5
DLQI
0
26
5
2.5-12.5
VAS
0
10
6
2-8
Description of the maximum and minimum values, median and interquartile
interval of the variables PASI, BSA, DLQI, VAS
Pruritus features
Pruritus was reported by 93.1% of patients, 51.7% of those with daily symptoms.
Most (82.8%) complained of the symptoms only in the psoriasis lesions while
17.2% complained of diffuse pruritus. Alleviating factors were reported by 75.9%
of patients, the most common being the use of topical steroids (24.1%) and
cutaneous hydration (48.2%). Among the triggering factors, reported and 72.4% of
cases, the most frequent were stress/anxiety (27.6%) and exposure to heat
(27.6%). Showering was described as an alleviating factor for the pruritus of
eight patients (27.6%) and as a triggering factor by three (10.3%).
Evaluation of skin biopsies
Of a total of 58 slides evaluated, 29 stained with GIEMSA and 29 with C-Kit, a
mean mast cell count of 6.3 was obtained (p25-75: 4.9-8) and 10.7 (p25-75:
8.65-13.5) for GIEMSA and immunohistochemistry, respectively.We did not find any statistically significant correlation in the quantification
of mast cells between PASI scores (p= 0.718 and rho= -0.070 IHC; p= 0.314 and
rho= 0.194 GIEMSA), DLQI (p= 0.692 and rho= -0.077 IHC; p= 0.769 and rho= 0.057
GIEMSA), VAS (p= 0.152 and rho= -0.273 IHC; p= 0.159 and rho= -0.269
GIEMSA).The larger number of mast cells (mean of 21.6 mast cells between fields stained
by IHC - figure 1 - and 10 mast cells with
GIEMSA - figure 2) was seen in a patient
with mild psoriasis (PASI= 5.3 and BSA=1) with no complaints of pruritus
(VAS=0).
Figure 1
Fragment of skin showing mast cells stained with C-kit (CD 117) in a
40x field
Figure 2
Mast cells stained with GIEMSA demonstrating intracytoplasmic
granules in a 40x field
Fragment of skin showing mast cells stained with C-kit (CD 117) in a
40x fieldMast cells stained with GIEMSA demonstrating intracytoplasmic
granules in a 40x fieldThe most severe psoriasispatient in our study (PASI= 29.3 and BSA=76) had a
VAS=7 and the mean amount of mast cells in their skin biopsy was of 14.6 and
9.64 IHC and GIEMSA, respectively.The analysis of the quantification of cells in relation to the sex found for men
a mean of 6.9 (standard deviation = 3.3) mast cells in GIEMSA and for women a
mean of 6.4 cells (standard deviation = 1.9), with no statistically significant
difference between those values (p = 0.602). The mean number of mast cells
evaluated by IHC was 12.8 (standard deviation = 5.5) for men and 10.2 (standard
deviation = 3.1) for women, also with no statistically significant
difference.In table 2, we compared the density of
mast cells (mean variable for both stains - IHC and GIEMSA) in patients who were
using some treatment for psoriasis (topical or systemic) and those who were not
using any treatment at the time of the study, with no statistically significant
difference between those. Even though patients using mast cell degranulating
drugs were excluded from the study, the use of drugs for the treatment of
psoriasis could have altered the mast cell count in the lesions of psoriasis, as
well as the assessment of pruritus of these patients.
Table 2
Quantification of mast cells in biopsies of psoriasis patients and
pruritus who use medication or not, stained by different techniques
With psoriasis
treatment n = 19
Without
psoriasis treatment n = 10
P
GIEMSA
6.8 ±
3.0
6.4 ±
1.6
0.757
IHC
12.0 ±
5.2
10.0 ±
2.3
0.152
Data presented by mean ± standard deviation and compared by
Student’s t test for independent samples.
Quantification of mast cells in biopsies of psoriasispatients and
pruritus who use medication or not, stained by different techniquesData presented by mean ± standard deviation and compared by
Student’s t test for independent samples.Bland and Altman’s graph shows the mean of the differences and the limits with a
dotted line (figure 3). The limits of 95%
of the concordance of the two techniques of quantification of mast cells between
-1.49 and 10.83. C-Kit staining identifies more mast cells than GIEMSA, and as
the number grows, the difference between mast cells increase. After calculating
the intraclass coefficient (ICC = 0.344) for mast cell counts with GIEMSA and
C-Kit, we can observe in figure 3 that
C-Kit count increases compared to GIEMSA according to the increase in the number
of cells. After 6-7 cells, the difference is more than five cells, what could
support the use of C-Kit instead of GIEMSA as the preferred technique for the
quantification of mast cells in the dermis.
Figure 3
Bland-Altman graph with the subsequent study of tendency as a
function of the measurement
Bland-Altman graph with the subsequent study of tendency as a
function of the measurement
DISCUSSION
Psoriasis is a chronic, stigmatizing dermatological disease of difficult management,
many times with systemic involvement and negative impact on the quality of life of
the patients. Pruritus is a frequent symptom; however, it is many times
underestimated in patients with psoriasis, contributing even further to reduce
quality of life of those affected.[23]Bilac et al[24]
assessed 87 patients with psoriasis and found a higher frequency of pruritus in
patients with DLQI≥10. Different to these findings, we did not find an
association between pruritus and quality of life in the population of our study.Our results confirm data in the literature that demonstrate that pruritus is one of
the most prevalent symptoms in patients with plaque psoriasis.[18,24] As Amatya et Nordlind[25] and Nakamura et al.,[19] we did not find a relationship
between pruritus and psoriasis severity, even though this association was reported
by other authors.[5] With similar
results, Prignano et al.[18] did not identify a statistically significant correlation
between the presence and intensity of pruritus with the patient’s age, sex, and
psoriasis severity according to PASI scores either.For the adequate management of pruritus in psoriasis, it is necessary to understand
its pathophysiology. Nakamura et al.[19] were the first to document the local market is
associated to pruritus in psoriasis through histological examination of the lesions
of 38 symptomatic patients compared to the findings in asymptomatic patients. The
peculiar feature of finding mast cells in lesions of patients with pruritus was the
presence of granules closely juxtaposed to the perineurium of non-myelinated nerve
fibers, finding that was not seen in any patient without pruritus. Contrary to our
findings, the authors observed the large amount of degranulating mast cells in the
papillary dermis of patients with pruritus. However, in the above-mentioned study,
the patients discontinued their psoriasis topical treatments two weeks before
starting the study, and the systemic treatments three months before. In our study,
both topical and systemic treatment for psoriasis were maintained, representing a
possible limitation, because it is known that the use of topical steroids and some
systemic medications such as retinoids in cyclosporine can reduce the mast cell
count.[26]The major limitation of our study was the small sample size, with an estimated
calculation in order to detect a moderate correlation with a value of r≥ 0.5,
considering a strength of 80% and the significance level of 0.05. However, it is
also important to note that we did not consider the time of the lesions or the
biopsy site (if in a photoexposed area or not) in our results. These data could
alter our results, since a higher density of mast cells can be seen in recent
lesions of psoriasis and in photoexposed areas since mast cells are activated and
recruited by ultraviolet and infrared radiation, as well as by heat.[9,27]Toruniowa e Jablónska[9]
studied 122 patients with psoriasis and 80 controls and showed an increase in the
number of mast cells after trauma on the skin, either from patients with psoriasis
or controls, demonstrating an important role of the mast cells in the inflammatory
response of the skin to trauma. Moreover, they proved that the Koebner phenomenon is
associated to the buildup of mast cells, reinforcing the involvement of mast cells
in early psoriasis lesions.Multiple mediators have been associated to pruritus in psoriasis, but none was in
fact proven as cause of pruritus. Histamine, which is one of the main pruritus
mediators in many dermatological conditions, seems not to be involved in the symptom
of patients with psoriasis. A correlation between the intensity of the pruritus and
serum levels of histamine in patients with psoriasis has not been demonstrated, as
well as no difference in serum levels of histamine between psoriasispatients, with
and without pruritus.[28]
CONCLUSION
Many studies already demonstrated the abnormal expression and/or distribution of many
neuropeptides and their receptors in psoriasis lesions, among those substance P (SP)
calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP).
Besides, many cytokines, in particular IL-2 have also been implicated in the
pathophysiology of pruritus in psoriasis.[19] However, there are still many gaps, such as the exact role
of the central nervous system in chronic pruritus. Therefore, more studies are
needed to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of pruritus and
psoriasis.Despite acting as important inflammatory cells in the pathophysiology of psoriasis,
we did not find a role for mast cells in the pruritus of psoriasis in our study,
what reinforces the concept that the pathophysiology of pruritus in psoriasis is
complex and multifactorial. We also conclude that the estimated mast cell count is
more precise with the technique of IHC compared to GIEMSA, especially when a large
number of mast cells is considered. Future studies are needed, evaluating the
pruritus mediators and considering other variables, such as time of the lesions and
areas biopsied for better understanding of pruritus in psoriasis.
Authors: L Ackermann; I T Harvima; J Pelkonen; V Ritamäki-Salo; A Naukkarinen; R J Harvima; M Horsmanheimo Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 9.302