Diego Strianese1. 1. King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry - University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To present an update on the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy for thyroid eye disease (TED) and to offer a general recommendation for management of TED, in light of these reports. METHODS: Data were retrieved from a literature search on PubMed, using the following words: thyroid eye disease, immunosuppressant, corticosteroid, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, etanercept, adalimumab, tocilizumab, teprotumumab, adverse effects, side effects, and complications. RESULTS: Corticosteroids continue to be the primary medical therapy for TED. Recent research has offered insight into potential differences between oral corticosteroid and intravenous corticosteroid treatment regimens in terms of efficacy and side-effect profiles, which proved more favorable for the latter. The use of some traditional immunosuppressive agents, such as methotrexate and mycophenolate, seems suitable as steroid-sparing medications. In recent years, many scientific reports demonstrated the effectiveness of biologic immunosuppressive agents in the management of TED. Etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab have been shown to be effective in reduction of the inflammatory signs with the possible added advantage of preventing relapse of the disease. Teprotumumab may control the disease activity, and it seems to be very effective in preventing disease progression. Infliximab might be useful in severe TED resistant to steroids and orbital decompression. CONCLUSIONS: Steroid therapy remains the first-line therapy for moderate/severe and severe vision-threatening TED. The biological agents may provide a deep and long-standing block of inflammatory activity in TED, with the hope to lower the risk of recurrences and to reduce the need of surgical intervention in moderate-to-severe disease. Indeed, the actual incidence of adverse effects is not yet well assessed because of the paucity of studies. Therefore, their use should be limited to those cases that really need an alternative therapy to steroids, handled by expert physician in this field.
PURPOSE: To present an update on the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapy for thyroid eye disease (TED) and to offer a general recommendation for management of TED, in light of these reports. METHODS: Data were retrieved from a literature search on PubMed, using the following words: thyroid eye disease, immunosuppressant, corticosteroid, methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, etanercept, adalimumab, tocilizumab, teprotumumab, adverse effects, side effects, and complications. RESULTS: Corticosteroids continue to be the primary medical therapy for TED. Recent research has offered insight into potential differences between oral corticosteroid and intravenous corticosteroid treatment regimens in terms of efficacy and side-effect profiles, which proved more favorable for the latter. The use of some traditional immunosuppressive agents, such as methotrexate and mycophenolate, seems suitable as steroid-sparing medications. In recent years, many scientific reports demonstrated the effectiveness of biologic immunosuppressive agents in the management of TED. Etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab have been shown to be effective in reduction of the inflammatory signs with the possible added advantage of preventing relapse of the disease. Teprotumumab may control the disease activity, and it seems to be very effective in preventing disease progression. Infliximab might be useful in severe TED resistant to steroids and orbital decompression. CONCLUSIONS:Steroid therapy remains the first-line therapy for moderate/severe and severe vision-threatening TED. The biological agents may provide a deep and long-standing block of inflammatory activity in TED, with the hope to lower the risk of recurrences and to reduce the need of surgical intervention in moderate-to-severe disease. Indeed, the actual incidence of adverse effects is not yet well assessed because of the paucity of studies. Therefore, their use should be limited to those cases that really need an alternative therapy to steroids, handled by expert physician in this field.
Authors: Vardaan Gupta; Christine L Hammond; Elisa Roztocil; Mithra O Gonzalez; Steven E Feldon; Collynn F Woeller Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 6.197