Molly B Conroy1, Shahab Shaffiey, Sarah Jones, David J Hackam, Gwendolyn Sowa, Daniel G Winger, Li Wang, Michael L Boninger, Amy K Wagner, Arthur S Levine. 1. M.B. Conroy is professor of medicine and chief, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. S. Shaffiey is a surgery resident, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. S. Jones is instructor of medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. D.J. Hackam is professor of pediatric surgery and surgeon-in-chief, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, Maryland. G. Sowa is professor and chair of physical medicine and rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. D.G. Winger is a statistician, University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. L. Wang is a statistician, University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. M.L. Boninger is professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A.K. Wagner is associate professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. A.S. Levine is senior vice chancellor for health sciences and dean, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Many medical schools require scholarly research projects. However, outcomes data from these initiatives are scarce. The authors studied the impact of the Scholarly Research Project (SRP), a four-year longitudinal requirement for all students at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (UPSOM), on research productivity and residency match. METHOD: The authors conducted a longitudinal study of non-dual-degree UPSOM graduates in 2006 (n = 121, non-SRP participants) versus 2008 (n = 118), 2010 (n = 106), and 2012 (n = 132), all SRP participants. The authors used PubMed for publication data, National Resident Matching Program for residency match results, and Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research for National Institutes of Health funding rank for residency-affiliated academic institutions. RESULTS: Research productivity of students increased for those completing the SRP, measured as a greater proportion of students with publications (27.3% in 2006 vs. 45.8% in 2008, 55.7% in 2010, and 54.5% in 2012; P < .001) and first-authorship (9.9% in 2006 vs. 26.3% in 2008, 33.0% in 2010, and 35.6% in 2012; P < .001). Across years, there was a significantly greater proportion of students with peer-reviewed publications matched in higher-ranked residency programs (57.0% with publications in the top 10%, 52.7% in the top 10%-25%, 32.4% in the top 25%-50%, 41.2% in the bottom 50%, and 45.2% in unranked programs; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal research experiences for medical students may be one effective tool in fostering student publications and interest in extending training in a research-focused medical center.
PURPOSE: Many medical schools require scholarly research projects. However, outcomes data from these initiatives are scarce. The authors studied the impact of the Scholarly Research Project (SRP), a four-year longitudinal requirement for all students at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (UPSOM), on research productivity and residency match. METHOD: The authors conducted a longitudinal study of non-dual-degree UPSOM graduates in 2006 (n = 121, non-SRPparticipants) versus 2008 (n = 118), 2010 (n = 106), and 2012 (n = 132), all SRPparticipants. The authors used PubMed for publication data, National Resident Matching Program for residency match results, and Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research for National Institutes of Health funding rank for residency-affiliated academic institutions. RESULTS: Research productivity of students increased for those completing the SRP, measured as a greater proportion of students with publications (27.3% in 2006 vs. 45.8% in 2008, 55.7% in 2010, and 54.5% in 2012; P < .001) and first-authorship (9.9% in 2006 vs. 26.3% in 2008, 33.0% in 2010, and 35.6% in 2012; P < .001). Across years, there was a significantly greater proportion of students with peer-reviewed publications matched in higher-ranked residency programs (57.0% with publications in the top 10%, 52.7% in the top 10%-25%, 32.4% in the top 25%-50%, 41.2% in the bottom 50%, and 45.2% in unranked programs; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal research experiences for medical students may be one effective tool in fostering student publications and interest in extending training in a research-focused medical center.
Authors: Sandra B Haudek; Ingrid Bahner; Andrea N Belovich; Giulia Bonaminio; Anthony Brenneman; William S Brooks; Cassie Chinn; Nehad El-Sawi; Shafik Habal; Michele Haight; Uzoma Ikonne; Robert J McAuley; Douglas McKell; Rebecca Rowe; Tracey A H Taylor; Thomas Thesen; Richard C Vari Journal: Med Sci Educ Date: 2022-05-04
Authors: Carolyn K Kan; Muhammad M Qureshi; Munizay Paracha; Teviah E Sachs; Suzanne Sarfaty; Ariel E Hirsch Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2021-05-12
Authors: Charlotte R den Bakker; Belinda Wc Ommering; Thed N van Leeuwen; Friedo W Dekker; Arnout Jan De Beaufort Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 2.692