Ariane Lewis1. 1. Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, HCC-5A, New York, NY, 10016, USA. ariane.kansas.lewis@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The case of Jahi McMath has captured the attention of the public, healthcare professionals, and ethicists. Jahi was declared brain dead in late 2013, but her family transferred her to New Jersey to continue organ support. A lengthy legal battle has been ongoing since then. Jahi's family and two neurologists, Drs. Calixto Machado and Alan Shewmon, believe that she is not brain dead. Her family and Dr. Shewmon think that she is capable of following commands, thus making her minimally conscious. METHODS: Review of case materials. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Because brain death is an irreversible coma, one of three conclusions must be drawn: 1) Jahi was never dead; 2) Jahi met the criteria for brain death, but she isn't dead now; or 3) Jahi's movements are not purposeful responses, and she has been brain dead since 2013. The possibility that a person who was declared brain dead is now following commands threatens to erode the notion that brain death should be considered legal death. The discordant ideas that Jahi is brain dead and is following commands can only be reconciled if a formal evaluation for determination of death is repeated by reputable examiners.
BACKGROUND: The case of Jahi McMath has captured the attention of the public, healthcare professionals, and ethicists. Jahi was declared brain dead in late 2013, but her family transferred her to New Jersey to continue organ support. A lengthy legal battle has been ongoing since then. Jahi's family and two neurologists, Drs. Calixto Machado and Alan Shewmon, believe that she is not brain dead. Her family and Dr. Shewmon think that she is capable of following commands, thus making her minimally conscious. METHODS: Review of case materials. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Because brain death is an irreversible coma, one of three conclusions must be drawn: 1) Jahi was never dead; 2) Jahi met the criteria for brain death, but she isn't dead now; or 3) Jahi's movements are not purposeful responses, and she has been brain dead since 2013. The possibility that a person who was declared brain dead is now following commands threatens to erode the notion that brain death should be considered legal death. The discordant ideas that Jahi is brain dead and is following commands can only be reconciled if a formal evaluation for determination of death is repeated by reputable examiners.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brain death; Ethics; Medicolegal; Minimally conscious state
Authors: Charles L Sprung; Robert D Truog; J Randall Curtis; Gavin M Joynt; Mario Baras; Andrej Michalsen; Josef Briegel; Jozef Kesecioglu; Linda Efferen; Edoardo De Robertis; Pierre Bulpa; Philipp Metnitz; Namrata Patil; Laura Hawryluck; Constantine Manthous; Rui Moreno; Sara Leonard; Nicholas S Hill; Elisabet Wennberg; Robert C McDermid; Adam Mikstacki; Richard A Mularski; Christiane S Hartog; Alexander Avidan Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Wulf-Rainer C Mattiesen; Simone C Tauber; Joachim Gerber; Stephanie Bunkowski; Wolfgang Brück; Roland Nau Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2009-03-11 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Ariane Lewis; James L Bernat; Sandralee Blosser; Richard J Bonnie; Leon G Epstein; John Hutchins; Matthew P Kirschen; Michael Rubin; James A Russell; Justin A Sattin; Eelco F M Wijdicks; David M Greer Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sam D Shemie; Laura Hornby; Andrew Baker; Jeanne Teitelbaum; Sylvia Torrance; Kimberly Young; Alexander M Capron; James L Bernat; Luc Noel Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 17.440