Literature DB >> 29923115

Finding a Balance: Reconciling the Needs of the Institution, Patient, and Genetic Counselor for Optimal Resource Utilization.

Devanshi Patel1, Erica L Blouch2, Linda H Rodgers-Fouché2, Margaret M Emmet2, Kristen M Shannon2.   

Abstract

The current practice of cancer genetic counseling is undergoing widespread change and scrutiny. While there are clinical resources for genetic counselors (GCs) regarding the delivery of cancer genetic services, there is limited literature regarding effective management of a genetic counseling clinical program. We have developed administrative tools to manage a large team of GCs at a single academic medical center over a period of increasing demand for genetics services, with the initial aim of decreasing wait time for urgent genetic counseling visits. Here, we describe the three main elements of the clinical operations: Balancing patient volume between GCs, scheduling tracks for both routine and urgent appointments, and a team of triaging GCs to ensure appropriate patient referrals. For each of these elements, we describe how they have been modified over time and present data to support the utility of these strategies. The preliminary evidence offered here suggests that these tools allow for an equitable distribution of patient volume between team members, as well as the timely and accurate scheduling of urgent patients. As a result of the experiences presented here, other genetic counseling programs grappling with similar issues should be aware that it is possible to shift clinical operations to serve certain patient populations in a more timely fashion while keeping both providers and GC staff satisfied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genetic counseling; Cancer genetic counseling program; Clinical operations; Genetic counselor workforce; Program administration; Triaging; Urgent patients; Workload distribution

Year:  2018        PMID: 29923115     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0270-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  15 in total

1.  Quality indicators and performance measures: methods for development need more standardization.

Authors:  Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  FDA Approval of PARP Inhibitors and the Impact on Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing Practices.

Authors:  Kathryn M Buchtel; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Shelly Weiss; Carmen Williams; Mario Pineda; Scott M Weissman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic Testing: What Problem Are We Trying to Solve?

Authors:  Kevin S Hughes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Who is at risk for compassion fatigue? An investigation of genetic counselor demographics, anxiety, compassion satisfaction, and burnout.

Authors:  Whiwon Lee; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Genetic testing and surgical decision making in hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C Soravia; T Berk; Z Cohen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The psychic costs of empathic engagement: personal and demographic predictors of genetic counselor compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Sharanya Udipi; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Juihsien Kao; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The Relationship Between Burnout and Occupational Stress in Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Brittney Johnstone; Amy Kaiser; Marie C Injeyan; Karen Sappleton; David Chitayat; Derek Stephens; Cheryl Shuman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  NSGC practice guideline: risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Janice L Berliner; Angela Musial Fay; Shelly A Cummings; Brittany Burnett; Todd Tillmanns
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing Into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Yun Li; Ann S Hamilton; Kevin C Ward; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; M Chandler McLeod; Reshma Jagsi; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 50.717

10.  The current state of cancer genetic counseling access and availability.

Authors:  Sara Knapke; Joy Larsen Haidle; Rebecca Nagy; Sara Pirzadeh-Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.