Literature DB >> 29923058

Evaluation Breast Cancer Information on The Internet in Arabic.

Lamya Alnaim1.   

Abstract

Nowadays, medical information regarding various diseases and disorders is available online. The Internet has become the first choice for the patient when it comes to gathering detailed information about a disease or problem. Therefore, in view of this frequent occurrence, the information that is provided online needs to be accurate; providing comprehensive facts, transparency, and quality. A study was carried out to determine the accuracy of information related to breast cancer on various websites. Websites which share information online about breast cancer, in the Arabic language, were selected. The quality of the websites was to be evaluated; however, there is no standard method for evaluating the quality of health websites. Hence, a rating form was developed for this study, to determine the completeness and transparency of a specific number of websites using three popular search engines. A 16-item questionnaire was prepared and validated to determine the quality of individual websites in addition to using the DISCERN instrument for assessing consumer health information. Most of the websites (approximately 47%) were deemed to be commercial in nature. Thirty-three percent were developed by non-profit organizations. They disseminated information concerning the risk factors (93%), screening, mammography (93%), surgical treatment (93%), chemotherapy (89%), radiotherapy (93%), and complementary medicine (0%) surrounding the treatment of breast cancer. About 67% of the websites were estimated to give completely correct information. Incidentally, only five websites had a healthcare professional or expert as the author, while nine of them had no author. Although numerous breast cancer-related websites exist, most do a poor job in providing Arabic-speaking women with comprehensive information about breast cancer surgery. Providing easily-accessible, high-quality online information has the potential to significantly improve patients' experiences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Coverage; DISCERN instrument; Reliability

Year:  2019        PMID: 29923058     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1378-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  23 in total

1.  The low availability of metadata elements for evaluating the quality of medical information on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  J Shon; M A Musen
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art.

Authors:  R J Cline; K M Haynes
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet.

Authors:  Petra Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

4.  Health information on the internet: quality issues and international initiatives.

Authors:  Ahmad Risk; Carolyn Petersen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet.

Authors:  Gbogboade Ademiluyi; Charlotte E Rees; Charlotte E Sheard
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-06

Review 7.  The importance of information giving for patients newly diagnosed with cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  M E Mills; K Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.036

8.  Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites.

Authors:  Funda Meric; Elmer V Bernstam; Nadeem Q Mirza; Kelly K Hunt; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; Raphael E Pollock; Mark A Musen; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

9.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

Authors:  D Charnock; S Shepperd; G Needham; R Gann
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Cancer patients' sources of information: use and quality issues.

Authors:  Moyra E Mills; Robin Davidson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.

Authors:  Zahraa Jasem; Zainab AlMeraj; Dari Alhuwail
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.