Literature DB >> 29922401

Pressure variations in cerebral venous sinuses of idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients.

Srikanth R Boddu1,2, Pierre Gobin1, Cristiano Oliveria3, Marc Dinkin3, Athos Patsalides1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the alteration of pressure characteristics in the cerebral venous sinuses before and after venous sinus stenting (VSS) using mean sinus pressures (MSPs), sinus pressure gradient (SPG), and sinus pressure pulsatility (SPP) parameters among the idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective evaluation of 45 consecutive IIH patients who underwent VSS at our institution. A written informed consent approved by the Weill Cornell Institutional Review Board was signed by the study participants. All patients (n = 45) were evaluated for MSPs and SPG. In a subgroup of 12 (n = 12) consecutive patients, SPP was measured. MSP was measured using microcatheter at superior sagittal sinus (SSS), transverse sinus (TS), and sigmoid sinus (SS). SPG was measured as trans-stenotic gradient and trans-torcular gradient. SPP was recorded in the dominant TS with a six French intermediate catheter. Statistical analysis was performed using paired student t-test and two sample t-tests tested for both equal and unequal variances. P values below 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 30.6 ± 10 years (7-59 years) and 43 out of 45 are female patients. The mean weight and BMI of the study population were 96 ± 24.7 kg (30.8-144 kg) and 35.6 ± 8.3 kg/M2 (16.4-51.4 kg/M2), respectively. VSS in IIH patients resulted in immediate reduction of MSP in the SSS {Δ Mean: -8.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI): -5.0-11.7 mm Hg], p < 0.001} and TS [Δ Mean: -11.8 mm Hg (95% CI: -7.5 to 13.4 mm Hg), p < 0.001] and increase of MSP in SS [Δ Mean: 7.5 mm Hg (95% CI: 6-10.1 mm Hg), p < 0.001]. Significant reduction of trans-stenotic SPG reduction [Δ Mean: -15.7 mm Hg (95% CI: -13.6-17.8 mm Hg), p < 0.001] and SPP [Δ Mean: -8 mm Hg (95% CI: -2.5-13.4 mm Hg), p < 0.05] was observed following VSS.
CONCLUSION: VSS resulted in immediate alteration of the cerebral venous sinus pressure measurements in patients with IIH.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29922401      PMCID: PMC5999300     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol        ISSN: 1941-5893


  16 in total

1.  CT arteriography and venography in pulsatile tinnitus: preliminary results.

Authors:  A Krishnan; D E Mattox; A J Fountain; P A Hudgins
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Cerebral venous pressure, intra-abdominal pressure, and dural venous sinus stenting in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Deborah I Friedman
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Transverse sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a review of 52 patients and of model predictions.

Authors:  R M Ahmed; M Wilkinson; G D Parker; M J Thurtell; J Macdonald; P J McCluskey; R Allan; V Dunne; M Hanlon; B K Owler; G M Halmagyi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Patency of the vein of Labbé after venous stenting of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses.

Authors:  Daniel M S Raper; Dale Ding; Ching-Jen Chen; Thomas J Buell; R Webster Crowley; Kenneth C Liu
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Time to re-assess the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Felipe C Albuquerque; Bradley A Gross; Michael R Levitt
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 6.  Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Where Are We Now?

Authors:  Marc J Dinkin; Athos Patsalides
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.806

7.  Intracranial venous pressures under conscious sedation and general anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel M S Raper; Thomas J Buell; Ching-Jen Chen; Dale Ding; Robert M Starke; Kenneth C Liu
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Pulse pressure not mean pressure determines cardiovascular risk in older hypertensive patients.

Authors:  J Blacher; J A Staessen; X Girerd; J Gasowski; L Thijs; L Liu; J G Wang; R H Fagard; M E Safar
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-24

9.  Meta-Analysis of CSF Diversion Procedures and Dural Venous Sinus Stenting in the Setting of Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  S R Satti; L Leishangthem; M I Chaudry
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: the prevalence and morphology of sinovenous stenosis.

Authors:  R I Farb; I Vanek; J N Scott; D J Mikulis; R A Willinsky; G Tomlinson; K G terBrugge
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Exploring The Current Management Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension, And Understanding The Role Of Dural Venous Sinus Stenting.

Authors:  Sam P Gurney; Sateesh Ramalingam; Alan Thomas; Alex J Sinclair; Susan P Mollan
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2020-01-14

Review 2.  Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a literature review and validation of contemporary findings.

Authors:  Aku L Kaipainen; Erik Martoma; Tero Puustinen; Joona Tervonen; Henna-Kaisa Jyrkkänen; Jussi J Paterno; Anna Kotkansalo; Susanna Rantala; Ulla Vanhanen; Ville Leinonen; Soili M Lehto; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Antti-Pekka Elomaa; Sara Qvarlander; Terhi J Huuskonen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Extent of transverse sinus stenosis does not predict visual outcomes in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  Arshia Eshtiaghi; Kirill Zaslavsky; Patrick Nicholson; Edward Margolin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.456

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.