| Literature DB >> 29922375 |
Michal Lehnert1, Mark De Ste Croix2, Zuzana Xaverova1, Michal Botek1, Renata Varekova1, Amr Zaatar1, Ondrej Lastovicka1, Petr Stastny3.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of soccer specific fatigue on muscular and neuromuscular function in male youth soccer players. Elite soccer players (n = 20; age 15.7 ± 0.5 y; body height 177.75 ± 6.61 cm; body mass 67.28 ± 8.29 kg) were measured before and after soccer specific exercise (SAFT90). The reactive strength index (RSI) was determined by a drop jump test, leg stiffness (LS) by a 20 sub-maximal two-legged hopping test, and a functional hamstring to quadriceps strength ratio from isokinetic concentric and eccentric strength of the dominant and non-dominant leg (measured at angular velocities of 1.05 rad · s-1 and 3.14 rad · s-1). Metabolic response to the SAFT90 was determined by blood lactate and perceived exertion was assessed by the Borg scale. After simulated match play, a significant decrease in absolute LS (t = 4.411; p < 0.001; ω2 = 0.48) and relative LS (t = 4.326; p < 0.001; ω2 = 0.49) was observed and the RSI increased significantly (t = 3.806; p = 0.001; ω2 = 0.40). A reduction in LS found after the SAFT90 indicates possible reduction in dynamic knee stabilization. However, if we consider the changes in other observed variables, the present study did not clearly confirm that fatigue induced by a soccer specific protocol increased the risk of ACL and hamstring injury. This may be attributed to the simulated rather than actual match play used in the present study.Entities:
Keywords: ACL; isokinetic; leg stiffness; neuromuscular function; reactive strength
Year: 2018 PMID: 29922375 PMCID: PMC6006546 DOI: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Isokinetic strength, reactive strength and leg stiffness characteristics before and after the soccer specific fatigue protocol.
| Variable | Pre-fatigue | Post-fatigue | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | % Change | |
| Peak torque (N·m) | |||
| Q Con 1.05 DL | 211.87 ± 45.54 | 204.72 ± 49.11 | -3.3 |
| Q Con 3.14 DL | 179.12 ± 30.12 | 177.73 ± 35.17 | -0.3 |
| Q Con 1.05 NL | 197.04 ± 44.93 | 193.03 ± 41.82 | -2.0 |
| Q Con 3.14 NL | 165.94 ± 34.12 | 168.24 ± 38.71 | 2.0 |
| H Con 1.05 DL | 144.14 ± 22.39 | 142.77 ± 23.60 | -0.2 |
| H Con 3.14 DL | 170.20 ± 27.30 | 163.88 ± 26.15 | -3.6 |
| H Con 1.05 NL | 138.53 ± 31.79 | 133.20 ± 29.80 | -3.5 |
| H Con 3.14 NL | 160.64 ± 30.68 | 155.98 ± 24.60 | -2.5 |
| H Ecc 1.05 DL | 157.37 ± 34.27 | 149.43 ± 30.00 | -4.8 |
| H Ecc 3.14 DL | 187.66 ± 26.56 | 181.76 ± 24.22 | -2.8 |
| H Ecc 1.05 NL | 149.22 ± 35.13 | 134.84 ± 28.26 | -9.5 |
| H Ecc 3.14 NL | 181.22 ± 25.63 | 177.95 ± 25.21 | -5.7 |
| H/Q | |||
| 1.05 DL | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 0.75 ± 0.17 | 0 |
| 3.14 DL | 1.05 ± 0.11 | 1.04 ± 0.12 | -4 |
| 1.05 NL | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 0 |
| 3.14 NL | 1.05 ± 0.18 | 1.10 ± 0.18 | 10 |
| RSI | 0.40 ± 0.07 | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 7.5 |
| ALS | 27.17 ± 4.41 | 24.81 ± 4.12 | -8.1 |
| RLS | 34.89 ± 5.54 | 31.81 ± 4.63 | -6.4 |
SD – standard deviation; Q – quadriceps; H – hamstrings; Con – concentric action;
Ecc – eccentric action; DL – dominant leg; NL – non-dominant leg;
H/Q – isokinetic hamstrings eccentric-to-quadriceps concentric functional ratio;
1.05, 3.14 – angular velocities; RSI – reactive strength index; ALS – absolute leg stiffness;
RLS – relative leg stiffness; ∗p < 0.05;
p < 0.01.