Edward Lum1,2, Paul J Murphy3,4. 1. University of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, ON, Canada. e.lum@unsw.edu.au. 2. University of New South Wales, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Sydney, Australia. e.lum@unsw.edu.au. 3. University of Waterloo, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, ON, Canada. 4. Cardiff University, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Cardiff, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Cochet-Bonnet (COBO) aesthesiometer is the current standard in corneal sensitivity assessment. This study investigates the influence of ambient room humidity levels on the stimulus force exerted by the instrument. METHODS: A COBO instrument (Luneau Opthalmologie) with 0.12 mm nominal nylon filament diameter was placed in an environment chamber (Electro-tech systems Inc. PA, USA) at 25 °C and relative humidity (%RH) set to either 20-80%, in 10% steps. After 12 h in the chamber at a chosen %RH level, the instrument was removed and exerted force measured by pressing the nylon filament onto the plate of an analytical microbalance (Mettler-Toledo AB265; precision ±0.0001 g) at a perpendicular angle, by a predetermined amount. Exerted force onto the microbalance was recorded in grams for a specified filament length. Procedure was repeated for filament lengths 10-60 mm, in 5 mm steps. The instrument was returned to the chamber and procedure repeated 5 times, before repeating at the next %RH setting (random order). Measurements at each filament lengths were compared using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's range test. A p-value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: Significant differences in exerted force were observed with alteration in %RH levels for each filament length (all p < 0.001). Exerted force decreased significantly with an increase in %RH for all filament lengths, with the average force decreasing by 15% with each 10% rise in %RH. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous suggestions that the rigidity of the COBO nylon filament is affected by ambient room humidity levels, with implications on the stimulus force delivered by the instrument. A conversion table is provided for converting filament lengths to pressure for a range of relative humidity levels.
PURPOSE: The Cochet-Bonnet (COBO) aesthesiometer is the current standard in corneal sensitivity assessment. This study investigates the influence of ambient room humidity levels on the stimulus force exerted by the instrument. METHODS: A COBO instrument (Luneau Opthalmologie) with 0.12 mm nominal nylon filament diameter was placed in an environment chamber (Electro-tech systems Inc. PA, USA) at 25 °C and relative humidity (%RH) set to either 20-80%, in 10% steps. After 12 h in the chamber at a chosen %RH level, the instrument was removed and exerted force measured by pressing the nylon filament onto the plate of an analytical microbalance (Mettler-Toledo AB265; precision ±0.0001 g) at a perpendicular angle, by a predetermined amount. Exerted force onto the microbalance was recorded in grams for a specified filament length. Procedure was repeated for filament lengths 10-60 mm, in 5 mm steps. The instrument was returned to the chamber and procedure repeated 5 times, before repeating at the next %RH setting (random order). Measurements at each filament lengths were compared using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's range test. A p-value < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. RESULTS: Significant differences in exerted force were observed with alteration in %RH levels for each filament length (all p < 0.001). Exerted force decreased significantly with an increase in %RH for all filament lengths, with the average force decreasing by 15% with each 10% rise in %RH. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous suggestions that the rigidity of the COBO nylon filament is affected by ambient room humidity levels, with implications on the stimulus force delivered by the instrument. A conversion table is provided for converting filament lengths to pressure for a range of relative humidity levels.
Authors: Hiroki Ueno; Giulio Ferrari; Takaaki Hattori; Daniel R Saban; Kishore R Katikireddy; Sunil K Chauhan; Reza Dana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Amanda Lemos Barros Martins Portela; Rafael Neves Moreno; Maria Helena Madruga Lima Ribeiro; Fernanda Miguel de Andrade; Yale Viana Alves; Mônica Alves; Rodrigo Pessoa Cavalcanti Lira Journal: BMC Ophthalmol Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 2.209
Authors: Daniela S Nosch; Matthias Oscity; Peter Steigmeier; Emanuele Käser; Markus Loepfe; Roland E Joos Journal: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.992