Literature DB >> 29921737

Selection Bias and Outcomes for Preterm Neonates.

Kerryn Atwell1,2, Emily Callander3, Daniel Lindsay2, Peter Blake Marshall4,5, Scott Adam Morris4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reported survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 23 weeks' gestation are based on the infants admitted to NICUs. In this study, we aim to describe the association between clinical characteristics and admission to NICU at 23, 24 and 25 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: Cohort data from 2 national databases enabled comparison of the clinical characteristics all Australian births and all NICU admissions during 2010-2013 at 23, 24, and 25 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: NICU admission occurred in 15% of all births at 23 weeks, in comparison with 49% at 24 weeks and 64% at 25 weeks. At 23 weeks, live-born infants were less likely to be admitted to NICU with birth weight <500 g compared with >500 g (13% vs 43%, P < .0001), and boys were admitted less compared with girls (33% vs 43%, P < .018). In contrast, birth weight (including birth weight <500 g) and sex had little or no impact on NICU admission at 24 and 25 weeks. Only 8% of live births were born by caesarean delivery at 23 weeks compared with 33% at 24 weeks and 48% at 25 weeks' gestation.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Australian population, admission to the NICU is more likely to be influenced by birth weight and sex at 23 weeks' gestation when compared with 24 and 25 weeks' gestation. Survival outcomes at 23 weeks may be affected by less active perinatal care. Uncertainty exists regarding the generalizability of current data regarding survival and developmental potential of live-born 23-week infants.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29921737     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-0470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of an Updated Neonatal Research Network Extremely Preterm Birth Outcome Model in the Vermont Oxford Network.

Authors:  Matthew A Rysavy; Jeffrey D Horbar; Edward F Bell; Lei Li; Lucy T Greenberg; Jon E Tyson; Ravi M Patel; Waldemar A Carlo; Noelle E Younge; Charles E Green; Erika M Edwards; Susan R Hintz; Michele C Walsh; Jeffrey S Buzas; Abhik Das; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  Intensity of perinatal care, extreme prematurity and sensorimotor outcome at 2 years corrected age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.

Authors:  Andrei S Morgan; Laurence Foix L'Helias; Caroline Diguisto; Laetitia Marchand-Martin; Monique Kaminski; Babak Khoshnood; Jennifer Zeitlin; Gérard Bréart; Xavier Durrmeyer; François Goffinet; Pierre-Yves Ancel
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Intensity of perinatal care for extremely preterm babies and outcomes at a higher gestational age: evidence from the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.

Authors:  Andrei Scott Morgan; Babak Khoshnood; Caroline Diguisto; Laurence Foix L'Helias; Laetitia Marchand-Martin; Monique Kaminski; Jennifer Zeitlin; Gérard Bréart; François Goffinet; Pierre-Yves Ancel
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Changes Overtime in Perinatal Management and Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants in One Tertiary Care Romanian Center.

Authors:  Diana Ungureanu; Nansi S Boghossian; Laura Mihaela Suciu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.948

5.  Medical Concerns of Induced Abortion and Contraception.

Authors:  Yun Sook Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.