Literature DB >> 29921569

Energetic costs of locomotion in bears: is plantigrade locomotion energetically economical?

Anthony M Pagano1,2, Anthony M Carnahan3, Charles T Robbins3, Megan A Owen4, Tammy Batson5, Nate Wagner5, Amy Cutting6, Nicole Nicassio-Hiskey6, Amy Hash6, Terrie M Williams2.   

Abstract

Ursids are the largest mammals to retain a plantigrade posture. This primitive posture has been proposed to result in reduced locomotor speed and economy relative to digitigrade and unguligrade species, particularly at high speeds. Previous energetics research on polar bears (Ursus maritimus) found locomotor costs were more than double predictions for similarly sized quadrupedal mammals, which could be a result of their plantigrade posture or due to adaptations to their Arctic marine existence. To evaluate whether polar bears are representative of terrestrial ursids or distinctly uneconomical walkers, this study measured the mass-specific metabolism, overall dynamic body acceleration, and gait kinematics of polar bears and grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) trained to rest and walk on a treadmill. At routine walking speeds, we found polar bears and grizzly bears exhibited similar costs of locomotion and gait kinematics, but differing measures of overall dynamic body acceleration. Minimum cost of transport while walking in the two species (2.21 J kg-1 m-1) was comparable to predictions for similarly sized quadrupedal mammals, but these costs doubled (4.42 J kg-1 m-1) at speeds ≥5.4 km h-1 Similar to humans, another large plantigrade mammal, bears appear to exhibit a greater economy while moving at slow speeds.
© 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceleration; Cost of transport; Metabolism; Overall dynamic body acceleration; Ursus arctos; Ursus maritimus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29921569     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.175372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  Landscape condition influences energetics, reproduction, and stress biomarkers in grizzly bears.

Authors:  Abbey E Wilson; Dan Wismer; Gordon Stenhouse; Nicholas C Coops; David M Janz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Field metabolic rates of giant pandas reveal energetic adaptations.

Authors:  Wenlei Bi; Rong Hou; Jacob R Owens; James R Spotila; Marc Valitutto; Guan Yin; Frank V Paladino; Fanqi Wu; Dunwu Qi; Zhihe Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Adrenal Cortisol Response to Increasing Ambient Temperature in Polar Bears (Ursus maritimus).

Authors:  Emily M Leishman; Maria Franke; Jill Marvin; Dylan McCart; Carol Bradford; Zoltan S Gyimesi; Anne Nichols; Marie-Pierre Lessard; David Page; C-Jae Breiter; Laura H Graham
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Mobility of the forearm skeleton in the Asiatic black (Ursus thibetanus), brown (U. arctos) and polar (U. maritimus) bears.

Authors:  Hayato Amaike; Motoki Sasaki; Nao Tsuzuki; Mitsunori Kayano; Motoharu Oishi; Kazutaka Yamada; Hideki Endo; Tomoko Anezaki; Naoya Matsumoto; Rumiko Nakashita; Misako Kuroe; Hajime Taru; Gen Bando; Yuko Iketani; Ryohei Nakamura; Nobutaka Sato; Daisuke Fukui; Nobuo Kitamura
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 1.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.