Literature DB >> 29920947

Metastatic gastric cancer: Does the site of metastasis make a difference?

Hwee Leong Tan1, Claramae Shulyn Chia1, Grace Hwei Ching Tan1, Su Pin Choo2, David Wai-Meng Tai2, Clarinda Wei Ling Chua2, Matthew Chau Hsien Ng2, Khee Chee Soo1, Melissa Ching Ching Teo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metastatic gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. We aim to study how clinical features and prognosis differs between different metastatic sites, and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma managed at a tertiary referral cancer center over a 5-year period. We divided our cohort into three groups based on the site(s) of metastasis at presentation-peritoneal metastasis only (P), distant metastasis only (D), and peritoneal and distant metastases (PD).
RESULTS: We studied 470 patients with 175 (37.2%), 193 (41.1%) and 102 (21.7%) patients in the P, D and PD groups, respectively. Patients with peritoneal disease (both P and PD) had higher proportions of patients experiencing chemotherapy disruption due to unplanned hospitalizations, which were also of a longer average duration. The P group had the longest overall median survival of 8.9 months compared to the PD and D groups with 7.4 and 5.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of ≥1 metastatic site (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-2.28; P  =  0.001) was significantly associated with increased overall mortality, whereas palliative systemic chemotherapy (HR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.22-0.37; P < 0.001) and palliative gastrectomy (HR 0.24; 95% CI, 0.15-0.39; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with decreased overall mortality.
CONCLUSION: Metastatic gastric cancer represents a heterogeneous disease, with specific disease complications and treatment outcomes unique to different metastatic sites. We can consider novel multimodality therapies for patient subgroups with isolated metastatic disease and good prognostic factors in a bid to improve long-term survival.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metastatic gastric cancer; metastatic site; prognostic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29920947     DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1743-7555            Impact factor:   2.601


  4 in total

1.  Prediction and prognostic significance of ALOX12B and PACSIN1 expression in gastric cancer by genome-wide RNA expression and methylation analysis.

Authors:  Zhiping Liu; Lei Li; Xindi Li; Mingtao Hua; Huaqing Sun; Shengui Zhang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-10

2.  Determination of Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients With Distant Lymph Node Metastasis Using Prealbumin Level and Prothrombin Time: Contour Plots Based on Random Survival Forest Algorithm on High-Dimensionality Clinical and Laboratory Datasets.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Minmin Xie; Yi Zhang; Xiaopeng Zhang; Chong Feng; Zhijun Wu; Ying Feng; Yahui Yang; Hui Xu; Tai Ma
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.197

3.  Impact of Sites of Metastatic Dissemination on Survival in Advanced Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Osvaldo Espin-Garcia; Di Maria Jiang; Michael J Allen; Lucy X Ma; Yvonne Bach; Eric X Chen; Gail Darling; Johnathan C Yeung; Rebecca K S Wong; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Sangeetha Kalimuthu; Raymond W Jang; Elena Elimova
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 4.  Prion Protein at the Leading Edge: Its Role in Cell Motility.

Authors:  Mariana Brandão Prado; Maria Isabel Melo Escobar; Rodrigo Nunes Alves; Bárbara Paranhos Coelho; Camila Felix de Lima Fernandes; Jacqueline Marcia Boccacino; Rebeca Piatniczka Iglesia; Marilene Hohmuth Lopes
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.