Literature DB >> 29920835

Iliac and mandible osteoblasts exhibit varied responses to LMHF vibration.

Anute Pravitharangul1, Srisurang Suttapreyasri2, Chidchanok Leethanakul1.   

Abstract

The facial and long bones have distinct developmental origins, structures, and cellular compositions. This study aimed to compare the in vitro responses of human mandible and long bone osteoblasts to low-magnitude, high-frequency (LMHF) mechanical vibration in terms of expression of mediators of bone remodeling. Osteoblast-like cell cultures were prepared from iliac crest and mandibular bone specimens from three individuals and cultured in osteogenic induction media. Induction of mature osteoblastic phenotypes was confirmed by analysis of DNA content, alkaline phosphatase activity and gene expression every 3 days for 27 days. Based on gene expression, mature osteoblasts formed by day 15 of induction culture. After 15 days of culture in induction media, mature osteoblasts were subjected to vibration (0, 30, or 60 Hz) for 30 min every 24 h. After 48 h, RANKL, OPG, IL-1β, IL-6 and TGF-β gene, and protein expression were determined by real-time PCR analysis of total cellular mRNA and ELISAs of the cell supernatants. Both iliac and mandible osteoblasts responded to LMHF vibration: IL-1β and RANKL mRNA were downregulated and IL-6 mRNA was upregulated. However, TGF- β mRNA was unaltered and OPG mRNA was upregulated in iliac osteoblasts, whereas both TGF-β and OPG mRNA were downregulated in mandible osteoblasts. As a result, LMHF reduced the RANKL/OPG mRNA ratio in iliac osteoblasts but did not alter the RANKL/OPG mRNA ratio in mandible osteoblasts. This study suggests mature iliac osteoblasts exhibit a more potent anti-resorptive response to vibration, while this tendency was not obviously apparent in mature mandible osteoblasts.
© 2018 International Federation for Cell Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone remodeling; facial bones; humans; ilium; osteogenesis; phenotype

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29920835     DOI: 10.1002/cbin.11019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Int        ISSN: 1065-6995            Impact factor:   3.612


  7 in total

1.  Effects of compressive stress combined with mechanical vibration on osteoclastogenesis in RAW 264.7 cells.

Authors:  Boontida Changkhaokham; Sumit Suamphan; Prasit Pavasant; Suwanna Jitpukdeebodintra; Chidchanok Leethanakul
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.684

2.  The effect of compressive force combined with mechanical vibration on human alveolar bone osteoblasts.

Authors:  Chatchai Chatmahamongkol; Anute Pravitharangul; Srisurang Suttapreyasri; Chidchanok Leethanakul
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-10-16

3.  Interleukin 6 decreases nociceptor expression of the potassium channel KV1.4 in a rat model of hand-arm vibration syndrome.

Authors:  Pedro Alvarez; Oliver Bogen; Jon D Levine
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Acvr1 deletion in osteoblasts impaired mandibular bone mass through compromised osteoblast differentiation and enhanced sRANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.

Authors:  Yue Hu; Xinqing Hao; Cangwei Liu; Chunxia Ren; Shuangshuang Wang; Guangxing Yan; Yuan Meng; Yuji Mishina; Ce Shi; Hongchen Sun
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Mandible and iliac osteoblasts exhibit different Wnt signaling responses to LMHF vibration.

Authors:  Anute Pravitharangul; Srisurang Suttapreyasri; Chidchanok Leethanakul
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-10-04

Review 6.  Possible Mechanisms for the Effects of Sound Vibration on Human Health.

Authors:  Lee Bartel; Abdullah Mosabbir
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 7.  Influence of Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration on Bone Cells and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Lena Steppe; Astrid Liedert; Anita Ignatius; Melanie Haffner-Luntzer
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.