Literature DB >> 29920586

Determining the Rotational Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads Employing Flat-Panel Computed Tomography.

Stefan Hunsche1, Clemens Neudorfer1, Faycal El Majdoub1, Mohammad Maarouf1, Dieter Sauner2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Directional deep brain stimulation (DBS) constitutes an emerging technology that allows selective stimulation of target structures via partitioned electrode contacts. In order to effectively perform target-tailored stimulation, knowledge of the rotational orientation of the segmented leads is imperative.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a universally applicable and reliable method for determination of lead orientation angles in DBS using flat-panel computed tomography (fpCT).
METHODS: A binary template of directional leads DB-2202-30 (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) and 6170 (Abbott, Plano, Texas) was imported into the 2-dimensional raw data set of a conventional fpCT scan. The template was aligned with and manually rotated around the predetermined lead trajectory. The overall orientation of the segmented lead can be deduced by transferring position and orientation of the lead orientation marker into the 3-dimensional volume. Accuracy of the method was investigated by two raters in a phantom study.
RESULTS: Accuracy were 5.4° ± 4.1° (range: 0.4°-11.9°) for rater 1 and 5.2° ± 3.0° (range: 0.3°-10.2°) for rater 2, when investigating DB-2202-30. For 6170 observed deviations were 2.5° ± 1.7° (range: 0.2°-5.2°) and 4.3° ± 3.6° (range: 0.2°-11.2°) for raters 1 and 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: fpCT imaging constitutes a precise and accurate means to determine the rotational orientation of directional leads. The approach is universally transferable to different electrode designs as the template can easily be adjusted to the electrodes' specific measures. The approach is independent from polar implantation angles owing to fpCT- and methodological features.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Keywords:  Deep brain stimulation; Directional leads; Flat-panel computed tomography; Stereotaxy

Year:  2019        PMID: 29920586     DOI: 10.1093/ons/opy163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 2332-4252            Impact factor:   2.703


  5 in total

Review 1.  Directional Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Frank Steigerwald; Cordula Matthies; Jens Volkmann
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Neuroimaging Technological Advancements for Targeting in Functional Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Robert Gramer; Christopher J Steele; Gavin J B Elias; Jürgen Germann; Ricardo Maciel; Walter Kucharczyk; Ludvic Zrinzo; Andres M Lozano; Alfonso Fasano
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  High resolution transcranial acoustoelectric imaging of current densities from a directional deep brain stimulator.

Authors:  Chet Preston; Alexander M Alvarez; Andres Barragan; Jennifer Becker; Willard S Kasoff; Russell S Witte
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Surgical Strategy for Directional Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Masuda; Hiroshi Shirozu; Yosuke Ito; Masafumi Fukuda; Yukihiko Fujii
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  MaDoPO: Magnetic Detection of Positions and Orientations of Segmented Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes: A Radiation-Free Method Based on Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Mevlüt Yalaz; Nicholas Maling; Günther Deuschl; León M Juárez-Paz; Markus Butz; Alfons Schnitzler; Ann-Kristin Helmers; Michael Höft
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.