Literature DB >> 29917226

Phase III randomized study of the proposed adalimumab biosimilar GP2017 in psoriasis: impact of multiple switches.

A Blauvelt1, J-P Lacour2, J F Fowler3, J M Weinberg4, D Gospodinov5, E Schuck6, J Jauch-Lembach6, A Balfour6, C L Leonardi7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is used to treat several inflammatory diseases, including plaque psoriasis. GP2017 is a proposed adalimumab biosimilar.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of multiple switches between GP2017 and reference adalimumab (ref-ADMB) following the demonstration of equivalent efficacy and similar safety and immunogenicity, in adult patients with active, clinically stable, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
METHODS: This 51-week double-blinded, phase III study randomly assigned patients to GP2017 (n = 231) or ref-ADMB (n = 234) 80 mg subcutaneously at week 0, then 40 mg biweekly from week 1. At week 17, patients were rerandomized to switch (n = 126) or continue (n = 253) treatment. The primary end point was patients achieving ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 16, with equivalence confirmed if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in PASI 75 between treatments was ± 18%. The key secondary end point was the change from baseline to week 16 in continuous PASI. Other end points were PASI over time; PASI 50, 75, 90 and100; pharmacokinetics; safety; tolerability and immunogenicity for the switched and continued treatment groups.
RESULTS: Equivalent efficacy between GP2017 and ref-ADMB was confirmed for the primary (66·8% and 65·0%, respectively; 95% CI -7·46 to 11·15) and key secondary end points (-60·7% and -61·5%, respectively; 95% CI -3·15 to 4·84). PASI improved over time and was similar between treatment groups at week 16, and the switched and continued groups from weeks 17 to 51. There were no relevant safety or immunogenicity differences between GP2017 and ref-ADMB at week 16, or the switched and continued groups from weeks 17 to 51. No hypersensitivity to adalimumab was reported upon switching.
CONCLUSIONS: Following the demonstration of GP2017 biosimilarity to ref-ADMB, switching up to four times between GP2017 and ref-ADMB had no detectable impact on efficacy, safety or immunogenicity.
© 2018 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29917226     DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  28 in total

Review 1.  Immunogenicity of Biologic and Biosimilar Therapies for Psoriasis and Impact of Novel Immunoassays for Immunogenicity Detection.

Authors:  Courtney E Heron; Rima I Ghamrawi; Esther A Balogh; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 7.403

2.  Biosimilars in the USA: Will New Efforts to Spur Approvals and Access Spur Uptake and Cost Savings?

Authors:  Stanton R Mehr; Richard A Brook
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-02

Review 3.  Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilie Sbidian; Anna Chaimani; Ignacio Garcia-Doval; Liz Doney; Corinna Dressler; Camille Hua; Carolyn Hughes; Luigi Naldi; Sivem Afach; Laurence Le Cleach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  Letter to the Editor Regarding "The Challenges of Switching Therapies in an Evolving Multiple Biosimilars Landscape: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence".

Authors:  Barbara Finck; Robert B Geller; Paul Walden
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilie Sbidian; Anna Chaimani; Ignacio Garcia-Doval; Liz Doney; Corinna Dressler; Camille Hua; Carolyn Hughes; Luigi Naldi; Sivem Afach; Laurence Le Cleach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-19

6.  Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilie Sbidian; Anna Chaimani; Sivem Afach; Liz Doney; Corinna Dressler; Camille Hua; Canelle Mazaud; Céline Phan; Carolyn Hughes; Dru Riddle; Luigi Naldi; Ignacio Garcia-Doval; Laurence Le Cleach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-09

7.  Knowledge and use of biosimilars in oncology: a survey by the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Authors:  Rosa Giuliani; Josep Tabernero; Fatima Cardoso; Keith Hanson McGregor; Malvika Vyas; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-03-06

Review 8.  Era of biosimilars in rheumatology: reshaping the healthcare environment.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Joao Goncalves; Mark Quinn; Fabrizio Benedetti; Jake Yongkwon Lee
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-05-21

9.  AURIEL-PsO: a randomized, double-blind phase III equivalence trial to demonstrate the clinical similarity of the proposed biosimilar MSB11022 to reference adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis.

Authors:  J Hercogová; K A Papp; V Chyrok; M Ullmann; P Vlachos; C J Edwards
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 10.  An Update Review of Biosimilars of Adalimumab in Psoriasis - Bioequivalence and Interchangeability.

Authors:  Xin Zhou; Zhuo Chen; Xinling Bi
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.