Literature DB >> 29917124

Socioeconomic Disparities in Electronic Cigarette Use and Transitions from Smoking.

Abigail S Friedman1, Samantha J L Horn2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic disparities have been established for conventional cigarette use, but not for electronic cigarettes. This study estimates socioeconomic gradients in exclusive use of conventional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, and dual use (ie, use of both products) among adults in the United States.
METHODS: Analyses consider nationally representative data on 25- to 54-year-old respondents to the 2014-2016 National Health Interview Surveys (N = 50306). Demographically adjusted seemingly unrelated regression models estimate how two socioeconomic status measures-respondent education and household income-relate to current exclusive use of conventional cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, and dual use.
RESULTS: Conventional cigarette use exhibits negative education and income gradients, consistent with existing research: -12.9 percentage points (confidence interval [CI]: -14.0, -11.8) if college educated, and -9.5 percentage points (CI: -10.9, -8.1) if household income exceeds 400% of the federal poverty level. These gradients are flatter for dual use (-1.4 [CI: -1.8, -0.9] and -1.9 [CI: -2.5, -1.2]), and statistically insignificant for electronic cigarette use (-0.03 [CI: -0.5, 0.4] and -0.3 [CI: -0.8, -0.2]). Limiting the sample to ever-smokers, higher education is associated with a 0.9 percentage point increase in likelihood of exclusive electronic cigarette use at interview (CI: 0.0, 1.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Education and income gradients in exclusive electronic cigarette use are small and statistically insignificant, contrasting with strong negative gradients in exclusive conventional cigarette use. Furthermore, more educated smokers are more likely to switch to exclusive e-cigarette use than less educated smokers. Such differential switching may exacerbate socioeconomic disparities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality, but lower the burden of tobacco-related disease. IMPLICATIONS: Research has not yet established whether socioeconomic disparities in electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use resemble those observed for conventional cigarettes. This article uses nationally representative data on US adults aged 25-54 to estimate income and education gradients in exclusive use of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and dual use. Both gradients are steep and negative for conventional cigarette use, but flat and statistically insignificant for e-cigarette use. Repeating the analysis among ever-smokers indicates that more educated smokers are more likely to transition toward exclusive e-cigarette use than less educated smokers. Such differential substitution may exacerbate disparities in smoking-related morbidity and mortality.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29917124     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  16 in total

1.  Sociodemographic Correlates of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Use in the United States, 2016-2017.

Authors:  Claire Adams Spears; Dina M Jones; Scott R Weaver; Jidong Huang; Bo Yang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Association of Smoking and E-Cigarette in Chronic Liver Disease: An NHANES Study.

Authors:  Raja Chandra Chakinala; Sameer Dawoodi; Stephanie P Fabara; Muhammad Asad; Azadeh Khayyat; Sangeetha Chandramohan; Aysha Aslam; Nkechi Unachukwu; Bibimariyam Nasyrlaeva; Richa Jaiswal; Sriram B Chowdary; Preeti Malik; Rizwan Rabbani
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2022-06-22

3.  Socioeconomic Differences in Lifetime and Past 30-Day E-Cigarette, Cigarette, and Dual Use: A State-Level Analysis of Utah Youth.

Authors:  Christopher Cambron; Kaitlyn J Thackeray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Associations Between Nicotine Knowledge and Smoking Cessation Behaviors Among US Adults Who Smoke.

Authors:  L M Snell; S M Colby; T DeAtley; R Cassidy; J W Tidey
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.825

5.  E-cigarette use is strongly associated with recent smoking cessation: an analysis of a representative population sample in Greece.

Authors:  Konstantinos Farsalinos; Georgios Siakas; Konstantinos Poulas; Vassilis Voudris; Kyriakoula Merakou; Anastasia Barbouni
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) among U.S. women of reproductive age: Prevalence, reported reasons for use, and toxin exposure.

Authors:  Sulamunn R M Coleman; Janice Y Bunn; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Hypatia A Bolívar; Rachel F Tyndale; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Geographic isolation predicts tobacco product use among youth: A latent class analysis.

Authors:  Melissa D Blank; Jenny E Ozga; Katelyn F Romm; Ashley Douglas; Linda Alexander; Nathan J Doogan; Michael Wilson; Geri Dino
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.667

8.  E-cigarette use in England 2014-17 as a function of socio-economic profile.

Authors:  Loren Kock; Lion Shahab; Robert West; Jamie Brown
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Predictors of smoking reduction among African American and Latinx smokers in a randomized controlled trial of JUUL e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Dana Rubenstein; Alexander W Sokolovsky; Elizabeth R Aston; Nicole L Nollen; Christopher H Schmid; Myra Rice; Kim Pulvers; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Clearing the Haze: What Do We Still Need to Learn about Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems?

Authors:  Lisa M Fucito; Hannah Malinosky; Stephen R Baldassarri; Roy S Herbst
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.