Background: Adenoviruses are significant pathogens for the immunocompromised, arising from primary infection or reinfection. Serotyping is insufficient to support nosocomial transmission investigations. We investigate whether whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides clinically relevant information on transmission among patients in a pediatric tertiary hospital. Methods: We developed a target-enriched adenovirus WGS technique for clinical samples and retrospectively sequenced 107 adenovirus-positive residual diagnostic samples, including viremias (>5 × 104 copies/mL), from 37 patients collected January 2011-March 2016. Whole-genome sequencing was used to determine genotype and for phylogenetic analysis. Results: Adenovirus sequences were recovered from 105 of 107 samples. Full genome sequences were recovered from all 20 nonspecies C samples and from 36 of 85 species C viruses, with partial genome sequences recovered from the rest. Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis suggested linkage of 3 genotype A31 cases and uncovered an unsuspected epidemiological link to an A31 infection first detected on the same ward 4 years earlier. In 9 samples from 1 patient who died, we identified a mixed genotype adenovirus infection. Conclusions: Adenovirus WGS from clinical samples is possible and useful for genotyping and molecular epidemiology. Whole-genome sequencing identified likely nosocomial transmission with greater resolution than conventional genotyping and distinguished between adenovirus disease due to single or multiple genotypes.
Background: Adenoviruses are significant pathogens for the immunocompromised, arising from primary infection or reinfection. Serotyping is insufficient to support nosocomial transmission investigations. We investigate whether whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides clinically relevant information on transmission among patients in a pediatric tertiary hospital. Methods: We developed a target-enriched adenovirus WGS technique for clinical samples and retrospectively sequenced 107 adenovirus-positive residual diagnostic samples, including viremias (>5 × 104 copies/mL), from 37 patients collected January 2011-March 2016. Whole-genome sequencing was used to determine genotype and for phylogenetic analysis. Results: Adenovirus sequences were recovered from 105 of 107 samples. Full genome sequences were recovered from all 20 nonspecies C samples and from 36 of 85 species C viruses, with partial genome sequences recovered from the rest. Whole-genome phylogenetic analysis suggested linkage of 3 genotype A31 cases and uncovered an unsuspected epidemiological link to an A31 infection first detected on the same ward 4 years earlier. In 9 samples from 1 patient who died, we identified a mixed genotype adenovirus infection. Conclusions: Adenovirus WGS from clinical samples is possible and useful for genotyping and molecular epidemiology. Whole-genome sequencing identified likely nosocomial transmission with greater resolution than conventional genotyping and distinguished between adenovirus disease due to single or multiple genotypes.
Authors: Rodric V Francis; Harriet Billam; Mitch Clarke; Carl Yates; Theocharis Tsoleridis; Louise Berry; Nikunj Mahida; William L Irving; Christopher Moore; Nadine Holmes; Jonathan K Ball; Matthew Loose; C Patrick McClure Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: James Blackstone; Oliver Stirrup; Fiona Mapp; Monica Panca; Andrew Copas; Paul Flowers; Leanne Hockey; James Price; David Partridge; Christine Peters; Thushan de Silva; Gaia Nebbia; Luke B Snell; Rachel McComish; Judith Breuer Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Juliana Cudini; Sunando Roy; Charlotte J Houldcroft; Josephine M Bryant; Daniel P Depledge; Helena Tutill; Paul Veys; Rachel Williams; Austen J J Worth; Asif U Tamuri; Richard A Goldstein; Judith Breuer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Chloe E Myers; Charlotte J Houldcroft; Sunando Roy; Ben K Margetts; Timothy Best; Cristina Venturini; Jose A Guerra-Assunção; Charlotte A Williams; Rachel Williams; Helen Dunn; John C Hartley; Kanchan Rao; Kathryn J Rolfe; Judith Breuer Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Akshay Dhingra; Elias Hage; Tina Ganzenmueller; Sindy Böttcher; Jörg Hofmann; Klaus Hamprecht; Patrick Obermeier; Barbara Rath; Fabian Hausmann; Thomas Dobner; Albert Heim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Luke W Meredith; William L Hamilton; Ben Warne; Charlotte J Houldcroft; Myra Hosmillo; Aminu S Jahun; Martin D Curran; Surendra Parmar; Laura G Caller; Sarah L Caddy; Fahad A Khokhar; Anna Yakovleva; Grant Hall; Theresa Feltwell; Sally Forrest; Sushmita Sridhar; Michael P Weekes; Stephen Baker; Nicholas Brown; Elinor Moore; Ashley Popay; Iain Roddick; Mark Reacher; Theodore Gouliouris; Sharon J Peacock; Gordon Dougan; M Estée Török; Ian Goodfellow Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 71.421
Authors: Oliver Stirrup; Joseph Hughes; Matthew Parker; David G Partridge; James G Shepherd; James Blackstone; Francesc Coll; Alexander Keeley; Benjamin B Lindsey; Aleksandra Marek; Christine Peters; Joshua B Singer; Asif Tamuri; Thushan I de Silva; Emma C Thomson; Judith Breuer Journal: Elife Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 8.140