Literature DB >> 29917088

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in a degenerated very small Mitroflow prosthesis.

Stéphane Lopez1, Pierre Meyer2, Jacques Teboul1, Pierre Deharo2, Alain Mihoubi3, Jean Pierre Elbeze3, Diane Lena4, Philippe Camarasa4, Jean Claude Laborde2, Laurent Drogoul2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and results of 'valve-in-valve' implantation using the 23-mm CoreValve for the treatment of degenerated 19-mm and 21-mm Mitroflow bioprostheses.
METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation for 19-mm and 21-mm Mitroflow bioprostheses. The height of implantation with respect to the ring of the Mitroflow prosthesis was targeted at -6 mm for the first 3 cases. In the following cases, the target was higher to promote free supra-annular movement of the leaflets.
RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 17 of 18 patients (94%). For implantations above the limit of -6 mm, the mean gradient was 10.4 ± 2.6 mmHg compared with 28.1 ± 11.6 mmHg for implantations below the limit of -6 mm (P < 0.01). For patients with severe stenosis as main mechanism of failure of the bioprosthesis, the mean post-procedural gradient was 31.2 ± 11.8 mmHg compared with 12.7 ± 6 mmHg in the absence of severe stenosis (P < 0.01). Patient-prosthesis mismatch (indexed effective orifice area ≤ 0.85 cm2/m2) and severe mismatch (indexed effective orifice area ≤ 0.65 cm2/m2) were present in 83% (15 of 18) and 27% (5 of 18) of patients, respectively. We did not notice any complications following the procedures. Six months after the procedure, functional status was improved in all patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Our short series demonstrates the ability to perform transcatheter 'valve-in-valve' implantation in 19-mm and 21-mm Mitroflow prostheses with satisfactory results, but high post-procedural gradients and patient-prosthesis mismatch remain a relatively frequent problem mostly when severe stenosis is the main mechanism of failure. Implantation in a high position is critical to decrease the rate of high postimplantation gradients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29917088     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  2 in total

1.  Long-Term Results (up to 20 Years) of 19 mm or Smaller Prostheses in the Aortic Position. Does Size Matter? A Propensity-Matched Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Horea Feier; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Oana Rachita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin T Luca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

2.  Long term follow up of percutaneous treatment for degenerated Mitroflow prosthesis with self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Isaac Pascual; Marcel Almendárez; Rut Álvarez Velasco; Antonio Adeba; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Rebeca Lorca; Rocío Díaz; Alberto Alperi; Héctor Cubero-Gallego; Jose Rozado; César Morís; Pablo Avanzas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.