Literature DB >> 29917073

Detection of distant interval metastases after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET(/CT): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

T E Kroese1,2, L Goense1,2, R van Hillegersberg1, B de Keizer3, S Mook2, J P Ruurda1, P S N van Rossum2.   

Abstract

Restaging after neoadjuvant therapy aims to reduce the number of patients undergoing esophagectomy in case of distant (interval) metastases. The aim of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant interval metastases after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched. The analysis included diagnostic studies reporting on the detection of distant interval metastases with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and both baseline staging and restaging after neoadjuvant therapy with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients in whom distant interval metastases were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) as confirmed by pathology or clinical follow-up (i.e. true positives). The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients in whom 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was false positive for distant interval metastases (i.e. false positives). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled outcomes and examine potential sources of heterogeneity. Fourteen studies were included comprising a total of 1,110 patients who received baseline staging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging of whom 1,001 (90%) underwent restaging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging. Studies were generally of moderate quality. The pooled proportion of patients in whom true distant interval metastases were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5-13%). The pooled proportion of patients in whom false positive distant findings were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was 5% (95% CI: 3-9%). In conclusion,18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer detects true distant interval metastases in 8% of patients. Therefore, 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging can considerably impact on treatment decision-making. However, false positive distant findings occur in 5% of patients at restaging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT), underlining the need for pathological confirmation of suspected lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29917073     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  11 in total

1.  Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Frank Hofheinz; Yimin Li; Ingo G Steffen; Qin Lin; Chen Lili; Wu Hua; Jörg van den Hoff; Sebastian Zschaeck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Restaging after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ingmar L Defize; Richard van Hillegersberg; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Steven H Lin; Jelle P Ruurda; Peter S N van Rossum
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

3.  Added value of MRI to endoscopic and endosonographic response assessment after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Sophie E Vollenbrock; Jolanda M van Dieren; Francine E M Voncken; Sietze T van Turenhout; Liudmila L Kodach; Koen J Hartemink; Johanna W van Sandick; Berthe M P Aleman; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Annemarieke Bartels-Rutten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A FDG-PET radiomics signature detects esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who do not benefit from chemoradiation.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Marcus Beck; Tom Päßler; Chen Lili; Wu Hua; Ha Dong Mai; Holger Amthauer; Matthias Biebl; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Jasmin Berger; Carmen Stromberger; Ingeborg Tinhofer; Jochen Kruppa; Volker Budach; Frank Hofheinz; Qin Lin; Sebastian Zschaeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Pellat; Anthony Dohan; Philippe Soyer; Julie Veziant; Romain Coriat; Maximilien Barret
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Detecting Interval Distant Metastases With 18F-FDG PET/CT After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Tiuri E Kroese; Jelle P Ruurda; Anne S Bakker; Jasvir Jairam; Stella Mook; Sylvia van der Horst; Gert J Meijer; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Peter S N van Rossum; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 10.782

Review 7.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Analysis of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Factors for Bone Metastasis in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Wenjuan Ma; Haixiao Wu; Jun Wang; Yile Lin; Xin Wang; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-10

9.  18F- FDG PET/CT-derived parameters predict clinical stage and prognosis of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Styliani Mantziari; Anastasia Pomoni; John O Prior; Michael Winiker; Pierre Allemann; Nicolas Demartines; Markus Schäfer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 10.  Clinical TNM staging for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Takeo Fukagawa; Yoshio Haga; Shin-Ichi Okazumi; Koji Oba
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.