Casey M Rebholz1,2, Alice H Lichtenstein3, Zihe Zheng1,2, Lawrence J Appel1,2,4, Josef Coresh1,2,4. 1. Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
Background: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern is recommended for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Assessment of dietary intake has been limited to subjective measures and a few biomarkers from 24-h urine collections. Objective: The aim of the study was to use metabolomics to identify serum compounds that are associated with adherence to the DASH dietary pattern. Design: We conducted untargeted metabolomic profiling in serum specimens collected at the end of 8 wk following the DASH diet (n = 110), the fruit and vegetables diet (n = 111), or a control diet (n = 108) in a multicenter, randomized clinical feeding study (n = 329). Multivariable linear regression was used to determine the associations between the randomized diets and individual log-transformed metabolites after adjustment for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, and hypertension. Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to identify a panel of compounds that discriminated between the dietary patterns. The area under the curve (C statistic) was calculated as the cumulative ability to distinguish between dietary patterns. We accounted for multiple comparisons with the use of the Bonferroni method (0.05 of 818 metabolites = 6.11 × 10-5). Results:Serum concentrations of 44 known metabolites differed significantly between participants randomly assigned to the DASH diet compared with both the control diet and the fruit and vegetables diet, which included an amino acid, 2 cofactors and vitamins (n = 2), and lipids (n = 41). With the use of PLS-DA, component 1 explained 29.4% of the variance and component 2 explained 12.6% of the variance. The 10 most influential metabolites for discriminating between the DASH and control dietary patterns were N-methylproline, stachydrine, tryptophan betaine, theobromine, 7-methylurate, chiro-inositol, 3-methylxanthine, methyl glucopyranoside, β-cryptoxanthin, and 7-methylxanthine (C statistic = 0.986). Conclusions: An untargeted metabolomic platform identified a broad array of serum metabolites that differed between the DASH diet and 2 other dietary patterns. This newly identified metabolite panel may be used to assess adherence to the DASH dietary pattern. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03403166.
RCT Entities:
Background: The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern is recommended for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Assessment of dietary intake has been limited to subjective measures and a few biomarkers from 24-h urine collections. Objective: The aim of the study was to use metabolomics to identify serum compounds that are associated with adherence to the DASH dietary pattern. Design: We conducted untargeted metabolomic profiling in serum specimens collected at the end of 8 wk following the DASH diet (n = 110), the fruit and vegetables diet (n = 111), or a control diet (n = 108) in a multicenter, randomized clinical feeding study (n = 329). Multivariable linear regression was used to determine the associations between the randomized diets and individual log-transformed metabolites after adjustment for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, and hypertension. Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to identify a panel of compounds that discriminated between the dietary patterns. The area under the curve (C statistic) was calculated as the cumulative ability to distinguish between dietary patterns. We accounted for multiple comparisons with the use of the Bonferroni method (0.05 of 818 metabolites = 6.11 × 10-5). Results: Serum concentrations of 44 known metabolites differed significantly between participants randomly assigned to the DASH diet compared with both the control diet and the fruit and vegetables diet, which included an amino acid, 2 cofactors and vitamins (n = 2), and lipids (n = 41). With the use of PLS-DA, component 1 explained 29.4% of the variance and component 2 explained 12.6% of the variance. The 10 most influential metabolites for discriminating between the DASH and control dietary patterns were N-methylproline, stachydrine, tryptophan betaine, theobromine, 7-methylurate, chiro-inositol, 3-methylxanthine, methyl glucopyranoside, β-cryptoxanthin, and 7-methylxanthine (C statistic = 0.986). Conclusions: An untargeted metabolomic platform identified a broad array of serum metabolites that differed between the DASH diet and 2 other dietary patterns. This newly identified metabolite panel may be used to assess adherence to the DASH dietary pattern. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03403166.
Authors: Ranee Chatterjee; Clemontina A Davenport; Lydia Kwee; David D'Alessio; Laura P Svetkey; Pao-Hwa Lin; Cris A Slentz; Olga Ilkayeva; Johanna Johnson; David Edelman; Svati H Shah Journal: Metabolomics Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 4.290
Authors: Maura E Walker; Rebecca J Song; Xiang Xu; Robert E Gerszten; Debby Ngo; Clary B Clish; Laura Corlin; Jiantao Ma; Vanessa Xanthakis; Paul F Jacques; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Casey M Rebholz; Aditya Surapaneni; Andrew S Levey; Mark J Sarnak; Lesley A Inker; Lawrence J Appel; Josef Coresh; Morgan E Grams Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Fenglei Wang; Megu Y Baden; Marta Guasch-Ferré; Clemens Wittenbecher; Jun Li; Yanping Li; Yi Wan; Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Deirdre K Tobias; Clary B Clish; Lorelei A Mucci; A Heather Eliassen; Karen H Costenbader; Elizabeth W Karlson; Alberto Ascherio; Eric B Rimm; JoAnn E Manson; Liming Liang; Frank B Hu Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Casey M Rebholz; Yan Gao; Sameera Talegawkar; Katherine L Tucker; Lisandro D Colantonio; Paul Muntner; Debby Ngo; Zsu Zsu Chen; Daniel Cruz; Daniel H Katz; Usman A Tahir; Clary Clish; Robert E Gerszten; James G Wilson Journal: Mol Nutr Food Res Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 5.914
Authors: Talha Rafiq; Sandi M Azab; Koon K Teo; Lehana Thabane; Sonia S Anand; Katherine M Morrison; Russell J de Souza; Philip Britz-McKibbin Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Hyunju Kim; Emily A Hu; Kari E Wong; Bing Yu; Lyn M Steffen; Sara B Seidelmann; Eric Boerwinkle; Josef Coresh; Casey M Rebholz Journal: J Nutr Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Shirin Pourafshar; Mira Nicchitta; Crystal C Tyson; Laura P Svetkey; David L Corcoran; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Olga Ilkayeva; Thomas M O'Connell; Pao-Hwa Lin; Julia J Scialla Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 5.717