Literature DB >> 29916066

Two-level cervical corpectomy-long-term follow-up reveals the high rate of material failure in patients, who received an anterior approach only.

Simon Heinrich Bayerl1, Florian Pöhlmann1, Tobias Finger1, Vincent Prinz1, Peter Vajkoczy2.   

Abstract

In contrast to a one-level cervical corpectomy, a multilevel corpectomy without posterior fusion is accompanied by a high material failure rate. So far, the adequate surgical technique for patients, who receive a two-level corpectomy, remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term clinical outcome of patients with cervical myelopathy, who underwent a two-level corpectomy. Outcome parameters of 21 patients, who received a two-level cervical corpectomy, were retrospectively analyzed concerning reoperations and outcome scores (VAS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Nurick scale, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (mJOAS), Short Form 36-item Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36)). The failure rate was determined using postoperative radiographs. The choice over the surgical procedures was exercised by every surgeon individually. Therefore, a distinction between two groups was possible: (1) anterior group (ANT group) with a two-level corpectomy and a cervical plate, (2) anterior/posterior group (A/P group) with two-level corpectomy, cervical plate, and additional posterior fusion. Both groups benefitted from surgery concerning pain, disability, and myelopathy. While all patients of the A/P group showed no postoperative instability, one third of the patients of the ANT group exhibited instability and clinical deterioration. Thus, a revision surgery with secondary posterior fusion was needed. Furthermore, the ANT group had worse myelopathy scores (mJOASANT group = 13.5 ± 2.5, mJOASA/P group = 15.7 ± 2.2). Patients with myelopathy, who receive a two-level cervical corpectomy, benefitted from surgical decompression. However, patients with a sole anterior approach demonstrated a very high rate of instability (33%) and clinical deterioration in a long-term follow-up. Therefore, we recommend to routinely perform an additional posterior fusion after two-level cervical corpectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical instability; Cervical myelopathy; Neck pain; Posterior fusion; Two-level cervical corpectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29916066     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-0993-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  2 in total

1.  Imaging evaluation of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 strut in cervical construction after 1-level corpectomy: a retrospective study of 520 patients.

Authors:  Weiyang Zhong; Xinjie Liang; Xiaoji Luo; Zhengxue Quan; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.175

2.  Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative and Traumatic Spine Disorders, Single-Center Experience of a Case Series of 119 Patients.

Authors:  Charles Tatter; Oscar Persson; Gustav Burström; Erik Edström; Adrian Elmi-Terander
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.703

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.