Literature DB >> 29915992

False Positive Reduction by an Annular Model as a Set of Few Features for Microcalcification Detection to Assist Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Jonathan Hernández-Capistrán1, Jorge F Martínez-Carballido2, Roberto Rosas-Romero3.   

Abstract

Early automatic breast cancer detection from mammograms is based on the extraction of lesions, known as microcalcifications (MCs). This paper proposes a new and simple system for microcalcification detection to assist in early breast cancer detection. This work uses the two most recognized public mammogram databases, MIAS and DDSM. We are introducing a MC detection method based on (1) Beucher gradient for detection of regions of interest (ROIs), (2) an annulus model for extraction of few and effective features from candidates to MCs, and (3) one classification stage with two different classifiers, k Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). For dense mammograms in the MIAS database, the performance metrics achieved are sensitivity of 0.9835, false alarm rate of 0.0083, accuracy of 0.9835, and area under the ROC curve of 0.9980 with a KNN classifier. The proposed MC detection method, based on a KNN classifier, achieves, a sensitivity, false positive rate, accuracy and area under the ROC curve of 0.9813, 0.0224, 0.9795 and 0.9974 for the MIAS database; and 0.9035, 0.0439, 0.9298 and 0.9759 for the DDSM database. By slightly reducing the true positive rate the method achieves three instances with false positive rate of 0: 2 on fatty mammograms with KNN and SVM, and one on dense with SVM. The proposed method gives better results than those from state of the art literature, when the mammograms are classified in fatty, fatty-glandular, and dense.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital mamograms,microcalcifications; Feature extraction; K-nearest neighbors; Morphologic image processing; Support vector machine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29915992     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-0989-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  12 in total

1.  Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.

Authors:  U Fischer; F Baum; S Obenauer; S Luftner-Nagel; D von Heyden; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A swarm optimized neural network system for classification of microcalcification in mammograms.

Authors:  J Dheeba; S Tamil Selvi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  A biologically inspired algorithm for microcalcification cluster detection.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Kostas Marias; Ruth English; Michael Brady
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Topological modeling and classification of mammographic microcalcification clusters.

Authors:  Zhili Chen; Harry Strange; Arnau Oliver; Erika R E Denton; Caroline Boggis; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Breast cancer detection and classification in digital mammography based on Non-Subsampled Contourlet Transform (NSCT) and Super Resolution.

Authors:  Fatemeh Pak; Hamidreza Rashidy Kanan; Afsaneh Alikhassi
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  A new method of detecting micro-calcification clusters in mammograms using contourlet transform and non-linking simplified PCNN.

Authors:  Ya'nan Guo; Min Dong; Zhen Yang; Xiaoli Gao; Keju Wang; Chongfan Luo; Yide Ma; Jiuwen Zhang
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Decreased breast cancer tumor size, stage, and mortality in Rhode Island: an example of a well-screened population.

Authors:  Natalie G Coburn; Maureen A Chung; John Fulton; Blake Cady
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.302

8.  Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.

Authors:  Marcelo A Duarte; Andre V Alvarenga; Carolina M Azevedo; Maria Julia G Calas; Antonio F C Infantosi; Wagner C A Pereira
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Breast Cancer Detection in a Screening Population: Comparison of Digital Mammography, Computer-Aided Detection Applied to Digital Mammography and Breast Ultrasound.

Authors:  Kyu Ran Cho; Bo Kyoung Seo; Ok Hee Woo; Sung Eun Song; Jungsoon Choi; Shin Young Whang; Eun Kyung Park; Ah Young Park; Hyeseon Shin; Hwan Hoon Chung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Fuzzy technique for microcalcifications clustering in digital mammograms.

Authors:  Letizia Vivona; Donato Cascio; Francesco Fauci; Giuseppe Raso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic Strategies for Breast Cancer Detection: From Image Generation to Classification Strategies Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.

Authors:  Jesus A Basurto-Hurtado; Irving A Cruz-Albarran; Manuel Toledano-Ayala; Mario Alberto Ibarra-Manzano; Luis A Morales-Hernandez; Carlos A Perez-Ramirez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.575

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.