Literature DB >> 29915931

Structural and histological differences between connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palatal mucosa or from the tuberosity area.

I Sanz-Martín1,2, E Rojo3, E Maldonado4, G Stroppa3, J Nart3, M Sanz4.   

Abstract

Tuberosity grafts had a greater percentage of lamina propria and lower percentage of submucosa when compared to lateral palate grafts.
OBJECTIVE: The study aims to understand the differences in the structural composition of soft tissue autografts harvested from the lateral palate or the tuberosity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated to receive autografts harvested either from palatal or tuberosity sites to augment horizontal volume deficiencies around single-tooth implants. Tissue biopsies were analyzed for histological and histo-morphometric analysis. Picro-sirius red stain was used to evaluate collagen 1 and 3. Also, immuno-histochemical analysis was performed against MMP1, MMP2, cytokeratin-10, cytokeratin-13, and lysine hydroxylase-2.
RESULTS: Twenty specimens were harvested from 9 subjects in the lateral palate group (PG) and 11 subjects in the tuberosity group (TG). The percentage of lamina propria represented 51.08% in the PG group and 72.79% in the TG group, while the area of submucosa was minimal in the TG group representing 4.89% of the total sample vs 25.75% in the PG. The total area of COL-1 and 3 in the TG was 1.19 ± 0.57 and 0.72 ± 0.44 mm2, respectively, while in the PG, the corresponding values were 1.4 ± 0.7 and 1.04 ± 0.5 mm2. The immuno-histochemical analysis generally showed a higher expression of LLH-2, MMP2, CYT-10, and CYT-13 in the TG when compared with the PG.
CONCLUSION: Tuberosity grafts had a greater percentage of lamina propria and lower percentage of submucosa. The collagen content in the lamina propria was similar for both groups while the immuno-histochemical profile showed differences in the antibody expression of the epithelial cells. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tuberosity grafts had more lamina propria and less submocusa, which may be beneficial for volume augmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Connective tissue; Dental implants; Histology; Palate; Soft tissue; Soft tissue graft

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29915931     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2516-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  27 in total

1.  Changes in cytokeratin expression during the development of the human oral mucosa.

Authors:  A Pelissier; J P Ouhayoun; M H Sawaf; N Forest
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.419

Review 2.  Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

Authors:  Leandro Chambrone; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Cytokeratin patterns of human oral epithelia: differences in cytokeratin synthesis in gingival epithelium and the adjacent alveolar mucosa.

Authors:  J P Ouhayoun; F Gosselin; N Forest; S Winter; W W Franke
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.880

4.  Relative Composition of Fibrous Connective and Fatty/Glandular Tissue in Connective Tissue Grafts Depends on the Harvesting Technique but not the Donor Site of the Hard Palate.

Authors:  Kristina Bertl; Markus Pifl; Lena Hirtler; Barbara Rendl; Sylvia Nürnberger; Andreas Stavropoulos; Christian Ulm
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 5.  Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Reinhard Gruber; Dieter D Bosshardt
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 8.728

6.  Human palatal and tuberosity mucosa as donor sites for ridge augmentation.

Authors:  Claudia Dellavia; Giano Ricci; Letizia Pettinari; Cristina Allievi; Fabio Grizzi; Nicoletta Gagliano
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes.

Authors:  H P Müller; A Heinecke; N Schaller; T Eger
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.728

8.  Soft tissue volume gain around dental implants using autogenous subepithelial connective tissue grafts harvested from the lateral palate or tuberosity area. A randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Ernest Rojo; Giorgio Stroppa; Ignacio Sanz-Martin; Oscar Gonzalez-Martín; Antonio Santos Alemany; José Nart
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in patients with different types of scars and keloids.

Authors:  Dietmar Ulrich; Franziska Ulrich; Frank Unglaub; Andrzej Piatkowski; Norbert Pallua
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  IHC Profiler: an open source plugin for the quantitative evaluation and automated scoring of immunohistochemistry images of human tissue samples.

Authors:  Frency Varghese; Amirali B Bukhari; Renu Malhotra; Abhijit De
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pontic site development for fixed dental prostheses with and without soft tissue grafting: 1-year results of a cohort study.

Authors:  Franz J Strauss; Brandon J Huber; Ana Valdés; Ronald E Jung; Sven Mühlemann; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Connective tissue graft versus xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Igor Ashurko; Svetlana Tarasenko; Aleksandr Esayan; Alexandr Kurkov; Karen Mikaelyan; Maxim Balyasin; Anna Galyas; Julia Kustova; Silvio Taschieri; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.