Gerrit Schaefer1, Vinay Pitchika1, Friederike Litzenburger1, Reinhard Hickel1, Jan Kühnisch2. 1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, München, Germany. 2. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich, München, Germany. jkuehn@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
AIM: This study compared the diagnostic outcomes of visual inspection (VI), digital bitewing radiography (BWR), and near-infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT, DIAGNOcam, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) for occlusal caries detection and assessment of posterior teeth. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This study included 203 patients (mean age 23.0 years). All individuals received a meticulous VI. Additionally, BWR and NIR-LT images were collected. All BWR and NIR-LT images were blindly evaluated for the presence of enamel caries lesions (ECLs) and dentin caries lesions (DCLs). The descriptive statistical analyses included calculation of frequencies, cross tabulations, and pairwise comparisons using Pearson chi-square tests. RESULTS: The majority of ECLs/DCLs were detected by VI in this low-risk adult population. The additional diagnostic outcomes in terms of ECLs/DCLs amounted to 5.0% (BWR) and 6.8% (NIR-LT). The combined usage of VI/NIR-LT or VI/BWR identified 95.7 and 94.4% of all ECLs/DCLs on occlusal surfaces, respectively. CONCLUSION: This comparative diagnostic study showed that VI detected the majority of occlusal caries lesions. Both additional methods showed limited benefits. Due to the valuable features of NIR-LT, i.e., X-ray freeness and clinical practicability, this method might be preferred over X-ray-based methods. Nevertheless, BWRs should be prescribed in clinical situations where insufficient fillings or multiple (deep) caries lesions are diagnosed or where there is a need to assess the caries extension in relation to the pulp. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: VI has to be understood as caries detection method of choice on occlusal surfaces in low-risk adult population which may help to avoid multiple diagnostic testing, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment.
AIM: This study compared the diagnostic outcomes of visual inspection (VI), digital bitewing radiography (BWR), and near-infrared light transillumination (NIR-LT, DIAGNOcam, KaVo, Biberach, Germany) for occlusal caries detection and assessment of posterior teeth. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This study included 203 patients (mean age 23.0 years). All individuals received a meticulous VI. Additionally, BWR and NIR-LT images were collected. All BWR and NIR-LT images were blindly evaluated for the presence of enamel caries lesions (ECLs) and dentin caries lesions (DCLs). The descriptive statistical analyses included calculation of frequencies, cross tabulations, and pairwise comparisons using Pearson chi-square tests. RESULTS: The majority of ECLs/DCLs were detected by VI in this low-risk adult population. The additional diagnostic outcomes in terms of ECLs/DCLs amounted to 5.0% (BWR) and 6.8% (NIR-LT). The combined usage of VI/NIR-LT or VI/BWR identified 95.7 and 94.4% of all ECLs/DCLs on occlusal surfaces, respectively. CONCLUSION: This comparative diagnostic study showed that VI detected the majority of occlusal caries lesions. Both additional methods showed limited benefits. Due to the valuable features of NIR-LT, i.e., X-ray freeness and clinical practicability, this method might be preferred over X-ray-based methods. Nevertheless, BWRs should be prescribed in clinical situations where insufficient fillings or multiple (deep) caries lesions are diagnosed or where there is a need to assess the caries extension in relation to the pulp. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: VI has to be understood as caries detection method of choice on occlusal surfaces in low-risk adult population which may help to avoid multiple diagnostic testing, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment.
Authors: Thais Gimenez; Chaiana Piovesan; Mariana M Braga; Daniela P Raggio; Chris Deery; David N Ricketts; Kim R Ekstrand; Fausto Medeiros Mendes Journal: Caries Res Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-01-04
Authors: Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Richard Hogan; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-01-27
Authors: Laura Regina A Pontes; Juan Sebastian Lara; Tatiane Fernandes Novaes; Julia Gomes Freitas; Thais Gimenez; Bruna Lorena P Moro; Haline C M Maia; José Carlos P Imparato; Mariana M Braga; Daniela P Raggio; Fausto M Mendes Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-03-15