| Literature DB >> 29915697 |
Bo Zhang1,2, Lijuan Yan3, Qiang Li4,5, Jie Zou1, Hao Tan2, Wei Tan2, Weihong Peng2, Xiaolin Li2, Xiaoping Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ganoderma lucidum, a valuable medicinal fungus, is widely distributed in China. It grows alongside with a complex microbial ecosystem in the substrate. As sequencing technology advances, it is possible to reveal the composition and functions of substrate-associated bacterial communities.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial composition; Dynamic change; Functional pathways; G. lucidum–bacteria-substrate; Ganoderma lucidum; NGS
Year: 2018 PMID: 29915697 PMCID: PMC6004108 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Chemical properties of substrate.
Mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was carried out by ANOVA using SPSS 19.0 software. The Post Hoc tests were done with LSD method. Different lower-case letters showed significant difference (P < 0.05) in the substrate chemical properties between the different growth stages of G. lucidum.
| Growth stage | pH | Moisture (%) | Total nitrogen (g/kg) | Total phosphorus (g/kg) | Total potassium (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyphal stage | 4.34 ± 0.11 | 64.60 ± 1.08 | 13.53 ± 0.30 | 2.74 ± 0.13 | 13.31 ± 0.34 |
| Budding stage | 5.29 ± 0.15 | 58.01 ± 1.22 | 10.75 ± 0.29 | 3.36 ± 0.08 | 15.45 ± 0.13 |
| Elongation stage | 5.05 ± 0.01 | 54.48 ± 2.02 | 11.25 ± 0.59 | 1.64 ± 0.07 | 8.80 ± 0.19 |
| Mature stage | 4.89 ± 0.06 | 38.56 ± 1.54 | 12.60 ± 0.04 | 2.43 ± 0.03 | 11.47 ± 0.68 |
Figure 1Venn diagram showing the number of shared OTUs between different growth stages of G. lucidum.
The average relative abundance of different bacterial phyla in the substrate during the four growth stages of G. lucidum.
Others are all unclassified phyla.
| Phylum | Abu. (%) at hyphal stage | Abu. (%) at budding stage | Abu. (%) at elongation stage | Abu. (%) at mature stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Thermi] | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Acidobacteria | 3.08 | 2.11 | 5.64 | 0.04 |
| Actinobacteria | 1.11 | 0.87 | 3.37 | 2.58 |
| Bacteroidetes | 1.65 | 1.00 | 8.66 | 1.48 |
| Chloroflexi | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Cyanobacteria | 0.09 | 0.02 | 1.54 | 0.03 |
| Elusimicrobia | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| Firmicutes | 40.37 | 34.96 | 40.06 | 20.70 |
| Fusobacteria | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| Gemmatimonadetes | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| Nitrospirae | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Planctomycetes | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Proteobacteria | 53.6 | 60.99 | 40.43 | 74.93 |
| Tenericutes | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Verrucomicrobia | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Others | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.14 |
Figure 2OTU average relative abundances of the major bacterial families in the substrate of G. lucidum during all growth stages.
Others: the families with relative abundances lower than 1% at each growth stage of G. lucidum.
Bacterial alpha diversity indices.
Mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was carried out by ANOVA using SPSS 19.0 software. The Post Hoc tests were done with LSD method. The index of the observed OTUs, was used to evaluate the observed OTU richness, whereas the Chao1 and ACE were used to estimate the total (observed and unobserved) OTU richness of the bacterial community. The indices of Shannon and Simpson were used to access the richness and evenness of bacterial community, respectively. Different lower-case letters showed significant difference (P < 0.05) in the diversity indices between the different growth stages of G. lucidum.
| Sample | Observed OTUs | Chao1 | ACE | Simpson | Shannon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyphal stage | 363 ± 21 | 197.00 ± 21.66 | 260.22 ± 40.72 | 0.85 ± 0.10 | 4.02 ± 0.62 |
| Budding stage | 357 ± 13 | 189.00 ± 24.58 | 270.17 ± 35.29 | 0.88 ± 0.00 | 4.08 ± 0.09 |
| Elongation stage | 505 ± 50 | 372.00 ± 70.55 | 479.66 ± 99.77 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 4.77 ± 0.33 |
| Mature stage | 491 ± 33 | 336.67 ± 53.46 | 422.42 ± 56.42 | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 4.21 ± 0.13 |
PEMANOVA analysis of bacterial community between different growth stages based on weighted UniFrac distance.
Significance of the differences in bacterial communities between the different growth stages were tested using 999 permutations.
| Significance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hyphal stage | Budding stage | 0.5014 |
| Elongation stage | 0.0014 | |
| Mature stage | 0.1000 | |
| Budding stage | Elongation stage | 0.0014 |
| Mature stage | 0.1000 | |
| Elongation stage | Mature stage | 0.0014 |
| Hyphal stage, Budding stage, Elongation stage, Mature stage | 0.0014 | |
Figure 3Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling ordination of bacterial communities based on weighted UniFrac distance.
Figure 4A cladogram showing the differentially abundant bacterial taxa at each of the four growing stages of G. lucidum based on LEfSe analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 2).
PICRUSt predicted KEGG pathways of bacterial community in the substrate (relative abundance > 1% in at least one growth stage) at different growth stages of G. lucidum.
Mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was carried out by ANOVA using SPSS 19.0 software. The Post Hoc tests were done with LSD method. Different lower-case letters showed significant difference (P < 0.05) in the relative abundance of the pathways between the different growth stages of G. lucidum.
| Function type | KEGG pathway | Relative abundance (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyphal stage | Budding stage | Elongation stage | Mature stage | ||
| Cellular processes | Cell motility | 2.77 ± 0.05 | 2.97 ± 0.32 | 2.75 ± 0.32 | 2.95 ± 0.32 |
| Environmental information processing | Membrane transport | 17.40 ± 1.96 | 16.31 ± 1.80 | 11.36 ± 0.81 | 14.08 ± 0.72 |
| Signal transduction | 2.14 ± 0.05 | 2.20 ± 0.09 | 2.27 ± 0.05 | 2.35 ± 0.16 | |
| Genetic information processing | Folding, sorting and degradation | 1.77 ± 0.10 | 1.79 ± 0.04 | 2.18 ± 0.04 | 1.98 ± 0.11 |
| Replication and repair | 6.06 ± 0.27 | 5.99 ± 0.14 | 6.91 ± 0.15 | 6.06 ± 0.12 | |
| Transcription | 2.44 ± 0.10 | 2.41 ± 0.02 | 2.54 ± 0.09 | 2.26 ± 0.05 | |
| Translation | 3.46 ± 0.23 | 3.42 ± 0.12 | 4.11 ± 0.16 | 3.58 ± 0.07 | |
| Metabolism | Amino acid metabolism | 9.81 ± 0.16 | 10.11 ± 0.46 | 10.38 ± 0.12 | 10.07 ± 0.27 |
| Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.11 | 0.80 ± 0.04 | |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 10.07 ± 0.26 | 10.09 ± 0.11 | 10.68 ± 0.05 | 9.94 ± 0.28 | |
| Energy metabolism | 4.85 ± 0.07 | 4.80 ± 0.04 | 5.42 ± 0.05 | 5.05 ± 0.01 | |
| Enzyme families | 1.80 ± 0.09 | 1.77 ± 0.02 | 2.01 ± 0.05 | 1.67 ± 0.06 | |
| Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism | 1.76 ± 0.09 | 1.73 ± 0.04 | 2.18 ± 0.25 | 1.74 ± 0.15 | |
| Lipid metabolism | 3.75 ± 0.01 | 3.86 ± 0.19 | 3.89 ± 0.10 | 3.93 ± 0.10 | |
| Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins | 3.58 ± 0.01 | 3.58 ± 0.03 | 3.94 ± 0.14 | 3.74 ± 0.11 | |
| Metabolism of other amino acids | 1.89 ± 0.04 | 2.02 ± 0.15 | 1.94 ± 0.05 | 2.13 ± 0.07 | |
| Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides | 1.98 ± 0.03 | 2.06 ± 0.10 | 2.04 ± 0.04 | 2.22 ± 0.07 | |
| Nucleotide metabolism | 2.97 ± 0.09 | 2.90 ± 0.14 | 3.16 ± 0.10 | 2.98 ± 0.05 | |
| Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism | 4.37 ± 0.20 | 4.61 ± 0.28 | 3.73 ± 0.23 | 4.86 ± 0.42 | |
| Unclassified | Cellular processes and signaling | 3.71 ± 0.13 | 3.73 ± 0.03 | 3.99 ± 0.09 | 3.89 ± 0.34 |
| Genetic information processing | 1.98 ± 0.16 | 2.05 ± 0.08 | 2.45 ± 0.06 | 2.48 ± 0.18 | |
| metabolism | 2.72 ± 0.08 | 2.76 ± 0.04 | 2.72 ± 0.16 | 2.96 ± 0.12 | |
| Poorly characterized | 4.90 ± 0.12 | 4.91 ± 0.03 | 5.29 ± 0.07 | 5.13 ± 0.27 | |