Literature DB >> 29915483

Anastomotic Failure in Colorectal Surgery: Where Are We at?

Vinna An1, Raaj Chandra1, Matthew Lawrence2.   

Abstract

Anastomotic leak (AL) can be a devastating complication in colorectal surgery. While it is less frequent in the modern era, it still results in significant morbidity and mortality, prolonged hospital stays and increases the costs and demands on health services. There is inevitable interplay between patient physiology and technical factors that predispose a patient to AL. Obesity, preoperative total proteins, male gender, ongoing anticoagulant treatment, intraoperative complication and number of hospital beds have been identified as independent risk factors. This has led to an online risk calculator for AL. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have also been implicated, but no significant evidence has yet been found to support causation. In addition, technical factors such as type of anastomosis, mechanical bowel preparation, drains, omentoplasty and faecal diversion have failed to show significant differences in AL rates. Early diagnosis and intervention in AL is essential in reducing the rates of morbidity and mortality. Clinical assessment has high sensitivity but low specificity and should be used in combination with imaging techniques to get a diagnosis. C-reactive protein is also a useful marker. The management will depend on the grade of AL and the clinical state of the patient. Management options include conservative measures such as antibiotics and/or percutaneous drainage to more invasion procedures such as open drainage and/or Hartmann's procedure. In conclusion, ALs will forever pose challenges to the surgeon in diagnosis and management. It is often the yardstick by which each surgeon is measured and is the source of significant morbidity to patients and health care services worldwide. As a result, a low threshold for investigation and intervention is mandatory to ensure better outcomes and lower overall mortality and morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic dehiscence; Anastomotic failure; Anastomotic leak; Colorectal surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 29915483      PMCID: PMC5991011          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-018-1745-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  62 in total

1.  Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection.

Authors:  Elyamani Fouda; Ayman El Nakeeb; Alaa Magdy; Enas A Hammad; Gamal Othman; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  E C Jesus; A Karliczek; D Matos; A A Castro; A N Atallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

3.  Intestinal anastomoses prior to 1882; a legacy of ingenuity, persistence, and research form a foundation for modern gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Ulrich A Dietz; Eike-Sebastian Debus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Early prediction of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer surgery by intramucosal pH.

Authors:  Monica Millan; Eduardo García-Granero; Blas Flor; Stephanie García-Botello; Salvador Lledo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Graham Branagan; Derek Finnis
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 6.  Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.

Authors:  Pui Yee Grace Choy; Ian P Bissett; James G Docherty; Bryan R Parry; Arend Merrie; Anita Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

7.  Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomoses: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  J D Beard; M L Nicholson; R D Sayers; D Lloyd; N W Everson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Liang Xiao; Wen-bo Zhang; Peng-cheng Jiang; Xue-feng Bu; Qun Yan; Hua Li; Yong-jun Zhang; Feng Yu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Thirty-seven patients treated with the C-seal: protection of stapled colorectal anastomoses with a biodegradable sheath.

Authors:  Annelien N Morks; Klaas Havenga; Henk O ten Cate Hoedemaker; Jeroen W A Leijtens; Rutger J Ploeg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  1 in total

1.  No Coil® placement in patients undergoing left hemicolectomy and low anterior resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Michele Ammendola; Michele Ruggiero; Carlo Talarico; Riccardo Memeo; Giorgio Ammerata; Antonella Capomolla; Rosalinda Filippo; Roberto Romano; Socrate Pallio; Giuseppe Navarra; Severino Montemurro; Giuseppe Currò
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.754

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.