Literature DB >> 29914881

Importance of accessibility and opening hours to overall patient experience of general practice: analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from a national patient survey.

Thomas E Cowling1, Azeem Majeed2, Matthew J Harris2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The UK government aims to improve the accessibility of general practices in England, particularly by extending opening hours in the evenings and at weekends. It is unclear how important these factors are to patients' overall experiences of general practice. AIM: To examine associations between overall experience of general practice and patient experience of making appointments and satisfaction with opening hours. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Analysis of repeated cross-sectional data from the General Practice Patient Surveys conducted from 2011-2012 until 2013-2014. These covered 8289 general practice surgeries in England.
METHOD: Data from a national survey conducted three times over consecutive years were analysed. The outcome measure was overall experience, rated on a five-level interval scale. Associations were estimated as standardised regression coefficients, adjusted for responder characteristics and clustering within practices using multilevel linear regression.
RESULTS: In total, there were 2 912 535 responders from all practices in England (n = 8289). Experience of making appointments (β 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24 to 0.25) and satisfaction with opening hours (β 0.15, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.16) were modestly associated with overall experience. Overall experience was most strongly associated with GP interpersonal quality of care (β 0.34, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.35) and receptionist helpfulness was positively associated with overall experience (β 0.16, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.17). Other patient experience measures had minimal associations (β≤0.06). Models explained ≥90% of variation in overall experience between practices.
CONCLUSION: Patient experience of making appointments and satisfaction with opening hours were only modestly associated with overall experience. Policymakers in England should not assume that recent policies to improve access will result in large improvements in patients' overall experience of general practice. © British Journal of General Practice 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access to health care; family practice; healthcare surveys; patient satisfaction; primary health care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29914881      PMCID: PMC6014409          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X697673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  22 in total

1.  Do patients value continuity of care in general practice? An investigation using stated preference discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  David Turner; Carolyn Tarrant; Kate Windridge; Stirling Bryan; Mary Boulton; George Freeman; Richard Baker
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-07

2.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Preferences for access to the GP: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Greg Rubin; Angela Bate; Ajay George; Phil Shackley; Nicola Hall
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.

Authors:  Charlotte A M Paddison; Gary A Abel; Martin O Roland; Marc N Elliott; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; John L Campbell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Performance of new alternative providers of primary care services in England: an observational study.

Authors:  Felix Greaves; Anthony A Laverty; Utz Pape; Anenta Ratneswaren; Azeem Majeed; Christopher Millett
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Should measures of patient experience in primary care be adjusted for case mix? Evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.

Authors:  Charlotte Paddison; Marc Elliott; Richard Parker; Laura Staetsky; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; John L Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.

Authors:  G Lyratzopoulos; M Elliott; J M Barbiere; A Henderson; L Staetsky; C Paddison; J Campbell; M Roland
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Why do patients with multimorbidity in England report worse experiences in primary care? Evidence from the General Practice Patient Survey.

Authors:  Charlotte A M Paddison; Catherine L Saunders; Gary A Abel; Rupert A Payne; John L Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Understanding high and low patient experience scores in primary care: analysis of patients' survey data for general practices and individual doctors.

Authors:  Martin J Roberts; John L Campbell; Gary A Abel; Antoinette F Davey; Natasha L Elmore; Inocencio Maramba; Mary Carter; Marc N Elliott; Martin O Roland; Jenni A Burt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-11-11

10.  The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  John Campbell; Patten Smith; Sonja Nissen; Peter Bower; Marc Elliott; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Factors associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments: findings from a cross-sectional national study in France.

Authors:  Diane Naouri; Guillaume Ranchon; Albert Vuagnat; Jeannot Schmidt; Carlos El Khoury; Youri Yordanov
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  Qualitative study of patient views on a 'telephone-first' approach in general practice in England: speaking to the GP by telephone before making face-to-face appointments.

Authors:  Sarah L Ball; Jennifer Newbould; Jennie Corbett; Josephine Exley; Emma Pitchforth; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Good communication was valued as more important than accessibility according to 707 Nordic primary care patients: a report from the QUALICOPC study.

Authors:  Torunn Bjerve Eide; Jørund Straand; Anja Maria Braend
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.581

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.