Literature DB >> 29914836

Strategies and outcomes for aortic endograft explantation.

Dean J Arnaoutakis1, Gaurav Sharma2, Stuart Blackwood2, Samir K Shah2, Matthew Menard2, C Keith Ozaki2, Michael Belkin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure of endovascular aneurysm repairs (EVARs) requiring open conversion remains a major challenge. We analyzed indications for repair, operative strategies, and outcomes with a focus on iliac artery degeneration after endograft removal.
METHODS: A prospective, institutional database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent explantation of a failed EVAR device. Demographics, reason for failure, operative details including extent of endograft removal, and complications/survival were examined. Postexplantation computed tomography imaging was evaluated for iliac artery degeneration.
RESULTS: There were 32 patients who underwent explantation from 2002 to 2017. Six patients were treated emergently for rupture. The majority were elderly (average age, 76 ± 8.5 years), white (100%) men (91%) who had their EVAR graft inserted 45.5 months (range, 0.3-86 months) before open conversion, usually at an outside institution (75%). Explanted endografts included nine AneuRx (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minn), nine Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz), four Endurant (Medtronic), three Zenith (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind), three Powerlink/AFX (Endologix, Irvine, Calif), one Aorfix (Lombard Medical, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom), one Talent (Medtronic), and two unknown. Failure was due to endoleak in 91% (type I, 38%; type II, 28%; type III, 13%; type V, 13%), infection in 6%, and occlusion/kinking in 3%. A previous attempt at endovascular salvage of EVAR occurred in 12 (37.5%) patients. Operative approach was transabdominal in 69% and retroperitoneal in 31%. Initial aortic clamp position was supraceliac in 31%, suprarenal in 31%, and infrarenal in 38%. Most patients had complete removal of their endograft (n = 19 [59%]), with 22 (69%) having at least the iliac limbs removed. Grafts with suprarenal fixation were more likely to have the upper main body left in situ (67% vs 17%; P = .029). The 30-day mortality was 6.3% (3.8% elective, 16.7% ruptured), and 31% had a major complication. Of the 23 patients who had follow-up imaging, there was a trend for more iliac degeneration (>5 mm in growth) in those who had the iliac limbs removed (29.4% vs 0%; P = .184). Three patients with iliac limb removal required subsequent iliac endovascular intervention (two for rupture). Patients who presented with a rupture had a decreased 5-year overall survival (33%) compared with those who were converted electively (59%).
CONCLUSIONS: Both complete and partial endograft explantation, although morbid procedures, can be performed safely. Postoperative imaging surveillance is important, especially if the endograft has been removed from the iliac arteries, as degeneration can occur.
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endograft explantation; Endograft infection; Endoleak; Open conversion; Rupture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29914836     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  2 in total

1.  Very Late Aortic Endograft Infection With Listeria monocytogenes in an Elderly Man.

Authors:  Jorge A Miranda; Ahmed Khouqeer; James J Livesay; Miguel Montero-Baker
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  Technical approach and outcomes of failed infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repairs rescued with fenestrated and branched endografts.

Authors:  Jesse Manunga; Larissa I Stanberry; Peter Alden; Jason Alexander; Nedaa Skeik; Elliot Stephenson; Jessica Titus; Joseph Karam; Xiaoyi Teng; Timothy Sullivan
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2019-10-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.