Literature DB >> 29914727

Categorisation of natural sounds at different stages of auditory recovery in cochlear implant adult deaf patients.

Kuzma Strelnikov1, Edward Collett2, Pascal Gaillard3, Eric Truy4, Olivier Déguine5, Mathieu Marx5, Pascal Barone6.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that cochlear implant (CI) patients are more efficient at performing sound categorisation than sound identification. However, it remains unclear how this categorisation capacity develops with time during the rehabilitation period after implantation. To investigate the role of the post-implantation auditory experience in the broad sound categorisation in CI patients, we recruited CI patients with different durations of CI experience: Newly implanted CI patients (less than six months), Intermediate CI patients (6-14 months) and Experienced CI patients with a duration of implantation greater than 14 months. The patients completed a Free Sorting Task (FST), which allowed them to categorise 16 natural sounds based on their own criteria. We found an early deficit in categorisation, especially for vocal sounds; the categorisation started to improve after approximately six months post-implantation with a change of categorisation strategy which relied on different acoustic cues as a function of time after CI. The separation of the category of vocal sounds from other sounds significantly increased between the Newly implanted and Intermediate groups, i.e. as experience with the cochlear implant was acquired. The categorisation accuracy of vocal sounds was significantly correlated with the post-implantation period only in the group of newly implanted CI patients. This is the first study to show that the categorisation of vocal sounds with respect to non-vocal sounds improves during the rehabilitation period post-implantation. The first six-month post-implantation period appears to be crucial in this process. Our results demonstrate that patients in different rehabilitation periods use different acoustic cues, which increase their complexity with the CI experience.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory categorisation; Cochlear implant; Free sorting task; Voice perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29914727     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  3 in total

1.  Categorization of everyday sounds by cochlear implanted children.

Authors:  Aurore Berland; Edward Collett; Pascal Gaillard; Michèle Guidetti; Kuzma Strelnikov; Nadine Cochard; Pascal Barone; Olivier Deguine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Perception of Environmental Sounds in Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Nathan Luzum; Aaron C Moberly; Michael S Harris
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  A study of voice and non-voice processing in Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  Kuzma Strenilkov; Jimmy Debladis; Juliette Salles; Marion Valette; Carine Mantoulan; Denise Thuilleaux; Virginie Laurier; Catherine Molinas; Pascal Barone; Maïthé Tauber
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.123

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.