| Literature DB >> 29914408 |
Nobila Valentin Yaméogo1, André Koudnoaga Samadoulougou1, Larissa Justine Kagambèga2, Koudougou Jonas Kologo1, Georges Rosario Christian Millogo1, Anna Thiam1, Charles Guenancia3,4, Patrice Zansonré1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe maternal and fetal outcomes after pregnancy complicated by peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM).Entities:
Keywords: Burkina Faso; Peripartum cardiomyopathy; Prognosis; Subsequent pregnancy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29914408 PMCID: PMC6006934 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-018-0856-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics according to the occurrence of death during subsequent pregnancy after PPCM
| n (%), median (interquartile range), mean ± SD | Total population | Alive patients ( | Deceased patients ( | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline data | ||||
| Age | 26.7 ± 4.6 | 26 ± 5 | 28 ± 6 | 0.44 |
| Low socio-economic status | 22 (75.8) | 12 (80) | 9 (64) | 0.43 |
| Gravidity | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 0.26 |
| Baseline LVEF after the first PPCM (%) | 49.9 ± 5.2 | 50 ± 6 | 50 ± 7 | 0.99 |
| Baseline LVEF after the PPCM < 50% | 16 (55.2) | 7 (47) | 9 (64) | 0.46 |
| Baseline LVEF after the first PPCM < 45% | 5 (17.2) | 2 (13) | 4 (29) | 0.39 |
| Baseline LVEDD after the PPCM (mm) | 53.3 ± 3.6 | 54 ± 4 | 53 ± 5 | 0.88 |
| Baseline sPAP after the PPCM (mmHg) | 29.2 ± 4.2 | 28 ± 5 | 30 ± 5 | 0.26 |
| Baseline TAPSE after the PPCM (mm) | 18.2 ± 2.4 | 19 ± 3 | 17 ± 3 | 0.10 |
| Follow-up data (at the time of hospitalization) | ||||
| Delay between last follow-up and hospitalization (month) | 17 ± 6 | 15 ± 6 | 18 ± 6 | 0.27 |
| Congestive heart failure | 19 (65.5) | 6 (40) | 14(100) | < 0.001 |
| LVEF (%) | 37.6 ± 4.7 | 44 ± 6 | 33 ± 6 | < 0.001 |
| LVEF < 40% | 14 (48.3) | 2 (13) | 13 (93) | 0.001 |
| Delta LVEF (%) | −19.3 ± 9 | - 11 ± 10 | −32 ± 15 | < 0.001 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 57.5 ± 3.9 | 59 ± 4 | 56 ± 5 | 0.05 |
| Delta LVEDD (%) | 8 ± 6 | 11 ± 11 | 5 ± 7 | 0.09 |
| sPAP (mmHg) | 37.9 ± 5.4 | 34 ± 5 | 42 ± 5 | < 0.001 |
| Delta sPAP (%) | 19 ± 8 | 17 ± 10 | 27 ± 15 | 0.07 |
| TAPSE (mm) | 16.8 ± 3.2 | 19 ± 3 | 14 ± 4 | < 0.001 |
| TAPSE < 17 mm | 11 (37.9) | 1 (7) | 10 (71) | < 0.001 |
| TAPSE < 18 mm | 13 (44.8) | 2 (13) | 11 (79) | < 0.001 |
| Delta TAPSE (%) | - 7.5 ± 5 | 3 ± 17 | −15 ± 27 | 0.03 |
| Pregnancy data | ||||
| Abortion | 6 (20.6) | 2 (13) | 4 (29) | 0.39 |
| Prematurity | 8 (27.6) | 4 (27) | 4 (29) | 1 |
| Full-term pregnancy | 51.7 | 9 (60) | 6 (43) | 0.47 |
| Newborn weight (g) | 2385 ± 286 | 2350 ± 500 | 2380 ± 300 | 0.90 |
PPCM peripartum cardiomyopathy, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, sPAP systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, TAPSE tricuspid annular plan systolic excursion
Fig. 1ROC curves with optimal cut-off values of LVEF (admission, baseline and delta) to predict mortality
Fig. 2ROC curves of TAPSE (admission, baseline and delta) to predict mortality
Fig. 3ROC curves of sPAP (admission, baseline and delta) to predict mortality