Literature DB >> 29914350

Evaluating methods of inferring gene regulatory networks highlights their lack of performance for single cell gene expression data.

Shuonan Chen1, Jessica C Mar2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A fundamental fact in biology states that genes do not operate in isolation, and yet, methods that infer regulatory networks for single cell gene expression data have been slow to emerge. With single cell sequencing methods now becoming accessible, general network inference algorithms that were initially developed for data collected from bulk samples may not be suitable for single cells. Meanwhile, although methods that are specific for single cell data are now emerging, whether they have improved performance over general methods is unknown. In this study, we evaluate the applicability of five general methods and three single cell methods for inferring gene regulatory networks from both experimental single cell gene expression data and in silico simulated data.
RESULTS: Standard evaluation metrics using ROC curves and Precision-Recall curves against reference sets sourced from the literature demonstrated that most of the methods performed poorly when they were applied to either experimental single cell data, or simulated single cell data, which demonstrates their lack of performance for this task. Using default settings, network methods were applied to the same datasets. Comparisons of the learned networks highlighted the uniqueness of some predicted edges for each method. The fact that different methods infer networks that vary substantially reflects the underlying mathematical rationale and assumptions that distinguish network methods from each other.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of network modeling algorithms applied to experimental single cell gene expression data and in silico simulated datasets where the network structure is known. Comparisons demonstrate that most of these assessed network methods are not able to predict network structures from single cell expression data accurately, even if they are specifically developed for single cell methods. Also, single cell methods, which usually depend on more elaborative algorithms, in general have less similarity to each other in the sets of edges detected. The results from this study emphasize the importance for developing more accurate optimized network modeling methods that are compatible for single cell data. Newly-developed single cell methods may uniquely capture particular features of potential gene-gene relationships, and caution should be taken when we interpret these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian network; Correlation network; Gene regulatory network; Single cell genomics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29914350      PMCID: PMC6006753          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2217-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  42 in total

1.  Emergence of scaling in random networks

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  DREAM4: Combining genetic and dynamic information to identify biological networks and dynamical models.

Authors:  Alex Greenfield; Aviv Madar; Harry Ostrer; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Single-Cell Network Analysis Identifies DDIT3 as a Nodal Lineage Regulator in Hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Cristina Pina; José Teles; Cristina Fugazza; Gillian May; Dapeng Wang; Yanping Guo; Shamit Soneji; John Brown; Patrik Edén; Mattias Ohlsson; Carsten Peterson; Tariq Enver
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Bayesian approach to single-cell differential expression analysis.

Authors:  Peter V Kharchenko; Lev Silberstein; David T Scadden
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census.

Authors:  Xiaojie Qiu; Andrew Hill; Jonathan Packer; Dejun Lin; Yi-An Ma; Cole Trapnell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing: Assessment of Differential Expression Analysis Methods.

Authors:  Alessandra Dal Molin; Giacomo Baruzzo; Barbara Di Camillo
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference.

Authors:  Daniel Marbach; James C Costello; Robert Küffner; Nicole M Vega; Robert J Prill; Diogo M Camacho; Kyle R Allison; Manolis Kellis; James J Collins; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  NetBenchmark: a bioconductor package for reproducible benchmarks of gene regulatory network inference.

Authors:  Pau Bellot; Catharina Olsen; Philippe Salembier; Albert Oliveras-Vergés; Patrick E Meyer
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Oscope identifies oscillatory genes in unsynchronized single-cell RNA-seq experiments.

Authors:  Ning Leng; Li-Fang Chu; Chris Barry; Yuan Li; Jeea Choi; Xiaomao Li; Peng Jiang; Ron M Stewart; James A Thomson; Christina Kendziorski
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  MAST: a flexible statistical framework for assessing transcriptional changes and characterizing heterogeneity in single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Greg Finak; Andrew McDavid; Masanao Yajima; Jingyuan Deng; Vivian Gersuk; Alex K Shalek; Chloe K Slichter; Hannah W Miller; M Juliana McElrath; Martin Prlic; Peter S Linsley; Raphael Gottardo
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  44 in total

1.  Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments.

Authors:  Christopher A Jackson; Dayanne M Castro; Richard Bonneau; David Gresham; Giuseppe-Antonio Saldi
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Network Medicine in Pathobiology.

Authors:  Laurel Yong-Hwa Lee; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Statistical mechanics meets single-cell biology.

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Investigating higher-order interactions in single-cell data with scHOT.

Authors:  John C Marioni; Jean Yee Hwa Yang; Shila Ghazanfar; Yingxin Lin; Xianbin Su; David Ming Lin; Ellis Patrick; Ze-Guang Han
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  A comprehensive survey of regulatory network inference methods using single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Hung Nguyen; Duc Tran; Bang Tran; Bahadir Pehlivan; Tin Nguyen
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Identification of genomic enhancers through spatial integration of single-cell transcriptomics and epigenomics.

Authors:  Carmen Bravo González-Blas; Xiao-Jiang Quan; Ramon Duran-Romaña; Ibrahim Ihsan Taskiran; Duygu Koldere; Kristofer Davie; Valerie Christiaens; Samira Makhzami; Gert Hulselmans; Maxime de Waegeneer; David Mauduit; Suresh Poovathingal; Sara Aibar; Stein Aerts
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.429

Review 7.  Co-expression in Single-Cell Analysis: Saving Grace or Original Sin?

Authors:  Megan Crow; Jesse Gillis
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Genetic mapping of etiologic brain cell types for obesity.

Authors:  Pascal N Timshel; Jonatan J Thompson; Tune H Pers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Inference of Gene Regulatory Network from Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data Using pySCENIC.

Authors:  Nilesh Kumar; Bharat Mishra; Mohammad Athar; Shahid Mukhtar
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 10.  A comprehensive survey of regulatory network inference methods using single cell RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Hung Nguyen; Duc Tran; Bang Tran; Bahadir Pehlivan; Tin Nguyen
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 11.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.