| Literature DB >> 29914082 |
Dandan Xu1,2, Ge Yu3, Pinggen Xi4, Xiangyu Kong5, Qi Wang6, Lingwang Gao7, Zide Jiang8.
Abstract
Botrytis cinerea is the pathogen of gray mold disease affecting a wide range of plant hosts, with consequential economic losses worldwide. The increased frequency of fungicide resistance of the pathogen challenges its disease management, and thus the development of alternative control strategies are urgently required. In this study, we showed excellent synergistic interactions between resveratrol and pyrimethanil. Significant synergistic values were recorded by the two-drug combination on the suppression of mycelial growth and conidia germination of B. cinerea. The combination of resveratrol and pyrimethanil caused malformation of mycelia. Moreover, the inoculation assay was conducted on table grape and consistent synergistic suppression of the two-drug combination was found in vivo. Our findings first revealed that the combination of resveratrol and pyrimethanil has synergistic effects against resistant B. cinerea and support the potential use of resveratrol as a promising adjuvant on the control of gray mold.Entities:
Keywords: adjuvant; antifungal activity; drug combination; gray mold; resistant isolate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29914082 PMCID: PMC6099729 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23061455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea isolates to pyrimethanil and cyprodinil.
| Isolates | Pyrimethanil | Cyprodinil | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotype | EC50 (mg/L) | Phenotype | EC50 (mg/L) | |
| GBW | MR | 33.8 | R | 66.5 |
| TGM | MR | 39.9 | MR | 10.4 |
| SGB | MR | 22.8 | MR | 15.1 |
| GMR | MR | 11.9 | S | 1.3 |
| BGM | HR | 70.7 | R | 22.1 |
| BRB | HR | 88.0 | MR | 11.1 |
S, MR, R and HR indicate sensitive, moderately resistant, resistant and highly resistant.
Interactions of resveratrol with pyrimethanil against Botrytis cinerea isolates.
| Isolates | MICs (mg/L) | FICs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alone | In Combination | |||||||
| MICA | MICB | CA | CB | FICA | FICB | FICI | IN | |
| GBW MR | 40 | 0.625 | 2.5 | 0.15625 | 0.0625 | 0.25 | 0.3125 | SYN |
| TGM MR | 80 | 1.25 | 5 | 0.078125 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | 0.125 | SYN |
| SGB MR | 40 | 0.625 | 2.5 | 0.3125 | 0.0625 | 0.5 | 0.5625 | IND |
| GMR MR | 20 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.078125 | 0.0625 | 0.0625 | 0.125 | SYN |
| BGM HR | 5 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 0.15625 | 0.25 | 0.0625 | 0.3125 | SYN |
| BRB HR | 20 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 0.3125 | 0.0625 | 0.125 | 0.1875 | SYN |
MR and HR indicate the B. cinerea isolates moderately resistant and highly resistant to pyrimethanil, respectively. MICs were read as the minimal concentrations that inhibit mycelial growth compared with control group. MICA and MICB represent the MICs of resveratrol and pyrimethanil used alone, CA and CB represent the MICs of resveratrol and pyrimethanil used in combination, respectively. FICs indicate the fractional inhibitory concentration, FICA and FICB represent the FICs of resveratrol and pyrimethanil, respectively. FICI was calculated using the fomula: FICI = FICA + FICB = CA/MICA + CB/MICB, and used as a determinant for drug interaction, defined as: FICI ≤ 0.5 for synergism, FICI > 4.0 for antagonism and 0.5 < FICI ≤ 4.0 for no interaction. IN, interpretation; SYN, synergism; IND, independence.
Figure 1Inhibition on Botrytis cinerea mycelial growth by resveratrol and pyrimethanil treatment, alone or in combination. Six tested isolates were cultured on the PDA medium without (control) or with drugs (resveratrol at 50 mg/L, pyrimethanil at 3.125 mg/L and their combination). Mycelial growth diameter was measured (A) and photographed (B) at 72 h post incubation. Also, the morphology of untreated mycelial (control) or mycelia treated with two-drug combination for 72 h were observed and imaged by optical microscopy (C). RES and PYR represent resveratrol and pyrimethanil used alone, respectively. RES+PYR represent resveratrol and pyrimethanil used in combination. Data was presented as mean ± SE (standard error), and same isolate followed by different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 2Suppression of B. cinerea conidia germination by resveratrol and pyrimethanil. Conidia suspension of B. cinerea isolate TGM (A) and BRB (B) was subject to different drug treatment and the conidia germination was measured at 6 h and 12 h post incubation. RES and PYR represent resveratrol and pyrimethanil used alone, respectively. RES+PYR represent resveratrol and pyrimethanil used in combination. Data was presented as mean ± SE (standard error), and same set of columns followed by different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 3Control of table grape gray mold by resveratrol and pyrimethanil. Harvested grape berries were subject different drug treatment along with B. cinerea inoculation and kept at 22 °C. Symptoms were assessed and photographed at 7 days post inoculation (A). Disease incidence (B) and lesion diameter (C) were measured at 4 days and 7 days post inoculation, presented as bar charts. RES and PYR represent resveratrol and pyrimethanil treatment individually. RES+PYR represent resveratrol and pyrimethanil used in combination. Data was presented as mean± SE (standard error), and same set of columns followed by different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 4Chemical structures of resveratrol and two tested fungicides.