Literature DB >> 29913983

A 6-months, randomised, placebo-controlled evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a low-dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal patch in osteoarthritis patients naïve to potent opioids.

Harald Breivik1, Tone Marte Ljosaa1, Kristian Stengaard-Pedersen2, Jan Persson3, Hannu Aro4, John Villumsen5, Dorthe Tvinnemose6.   

Abstract

Objective Patients with osteoarthritis (OA) pain often have insufficient pain relief from non-opioid analgesics. The aim of this trial was to study efficacy and tolerability of a low dose 7-day buprenorphine transdermal delivery system, added to a NSAID or coxib regimen, in opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe OA pain. Methods A 6 months randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study at 19 centres in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, in which OA patients (>40 years) with at least moderate radiographic OA changes and at least moderate pain in a hip and/or knee while on a NSAID or a coxib were randomised to a 7-day buprenorphine patch (n = 100) or an identical placebo patch (n = 99). The initial patch delivered buprenorphine 5 μg/h. This was titrated to 10 or 20 μg/h, as needed. Rescue analgesic was paracetamol 0.5-4 g daily. Statistical analysis of outcome data was mainly with a general linear model, with treatment as factor, the primary joint of osteoarthritis, baseline scores, and season as covariates. Results Most patients had OA-radiographic grade II (moderate) or grade III (severe), only 8 in each group had very severe OA (grade IV). The median buprenorphine dose was 10 μg/h. 31 buprenorphine-treated patients and 2 placebo-treated patients withdrew because of side effects. Lack of effect caused 12 placebo-treated and 7 buprenorphine-treated patients to withdraw. The differences in effects between treatments: Daytime pain on movement, recorded every evening on a 0-10 numeric rating scale decreased significantly more (P = 0.029) in the buprenorphine group. Patients' Global Impression of Change at the end of the double blind period was significantly improved in the buprenorphine group (P = 0.017). The chosen primary effect outcome measure, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index for Pain (P = 0.061), and secondary outcome measures, the WOMAC OA score for functional abilities (P = 0.055), and the WOMAC total score (P = 0.059) indicated more effects from buprenorphine than placebo, but these differences were not statistically significant. In a post-hoc, subgroup analysis with the 16 patients with radiographic grad IV (very severe) excluded, WOMAC OA Index for Pain was significantly (P = 0.039) reduced by buprenorphine, compared with placebo. WOMAC OA score for stiffness and the amount of rescue medication taken did not differ. Sleep disturbance, quality of sleep, and quality of life improved in both groups. Side effects: Typical opioid side effects caused withdrawal at a median of 110 [corrected] days before completing the 168 days double blind trial in 1/3 of the buprenorphine group. Mostly mild local skin reactions occurred equally often (1/3) in both groups. Conclusions Although the 24 hours WOMAC OsteoArthritis Index of pain was not statistically significantly superior to placebo, day-time movement-related pain and patients' global impression of improvement at the end of the 6-months double blind treatment period were significantly better in patients treated with buprenorphine compared with placebo. Opioid side effects caused 1/3 of the buprenorphine-patients to withdraw before the end of the 6-months double blind study period. Implications A low dose 7-days buprenorphine patch at 5-20 μg/h is a possible means of pain relief in about 2/3 of elderly osteoarthritis patients, in whom pain is opioid-sensitive, surgery is not possible, NSAIDs and coxibs are not recommended, and paracetamol in tolerable doses is not effective enough. Vigilant focus on and management of opioid side effects are essential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buprenorphine; Chronic pain; Movement-related pain; Osteoarthritis; Patients’ global impression of change; Transdermal patch; placebo

Year:  2010        PMID: 29913983     DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Pain        ISSN: 1877-8860


  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of transdermal buprenorphine patch in the elderly.

Authors:  Nabil Al-Tawil; Ingegerd Odar-Cederlöf; Anna-Carin Berggren; Helen E Johnson; Jan Persson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Pain management in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Payel J Roy; Melanie Weltman; Laura M Dember; Jane Liebschutz; Manisha Jhamb
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 3.  Safety And Efficacy Of The Unique Opioid Buprenorphine For The Treatment Of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Robert B Raffa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 4.  Pain Control in Latin America: The Optimized Role of Buprenorphine in the Treatment of Cancer and Noncancer Pain.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Robert Taylor; Jo Ann LeQuang; Argelia Lara; Andres Hernandez Ortiz; Miguel A Ruiz Iban
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2019-05-17

5.  The individual and societal burden of chronic pain in Europe: the case for strategic prioritisation and action to improve knowledge and availability of appropriate care.

Authors:  Harald Breivik; Elon Eisenberg; Tony O'Brien
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Use of immediate-release opioids as supplemental analgesia during management of moderate-to-severe chronic pain with buprenorphine transdermal system.

Authors:  Sanford Silverman; Robert B Raffa; Marc J Cataldo; Monica Kwarcinski; Steven R Ripa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Analgesic impact of buprenorphine transdermal patch in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Wen-Min Li; Feng-Dao Li; Hua Xu; Li-Chen Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.