Literature DB >> 29913084

Demographic Comparison of American Individuals in Polyamorous and Monogamous Relationships.

Rhonda N Balzarini1, Christoffer Dharma1, Taylor Kohut1, Bjarne M Holmes2, Lorne Campbell1, Justin J Lehmiller3, Jennifer J Harman4.   

Abstract

Research on polyamorous relationships has increased substantially over the past decade. This work has documented how polyamory is practiced and why individuals might pursue such arrangements. However, there is a lack of a systematic investigation of who is in polyamorous relationships and how they might differ from individuals in monogamous relationships. The present study is one of the first to address this by comparing the demographic backgrounds of individuals in polyamorous (N = 2,428) and monogamous (N = 539) relationships in the United States. Compared to participants in monogamous relationships, those in polyamorous relationships were more likely to report minority sexual identities. Despite similar age distributions, individuals in polyamorous relationships were more likely to report being in a civil union, being divorced, and earning less than $40,000 per year compared to individuals in monogamous relationships. People in polyamorous relationships were also more likely to select "other" options for most demographic characteristics, suggesting that they tend to choose less traditional response options in general. The current research highlights several demographic differences that need to be considered and potentially controlled for in future comparisons of polyamorous and monogamous relationships.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29913084     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1474333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  6 in total

1.  Exploring Minority Stress and Resilience in a Polyamorous Sample.

Authors:  Ryan G Witherspoon; Peter S Theodore
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  Internalized Consensual Non-Monogamy Negativity and Relationship Quality Among People Engaged in Polyamory, Swinging, and Open Relationships.

Authors:  Amy C Moors; Heath A Schechinger; Rhonda Balzarini; Sharon Flicker
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-06-07

3.  Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; James N McDonald; Taylor Kohut; Justin J Lehmiller; Bjarne M Holmes; Jennifer J Harman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Preferences in Information Processing, Marginalized Identity, and Non-Monogamy: Understanding Factors in Suicide-Related Behavior among Members of the Alternative Sexuality Community.

Authors:  Robert J Cramer; Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling; Andrea R Kaniuka; Corrine N Wilsey; Annelise Mennicke; Susan Wright; Erika Montanaro; Jessamyn Bowling; Kristin E Heron
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Assumption of the Myths of Romantic Love: Its Relationship With Sex, Type of Sex-Affective Relationship, and Sexual Orientation.

Authors:  Jenny Cubells-Serra; Alejandro Sánchez-Sicilia; Priscila Astudillo-Mendoza; Neli Escandón-Nagel; María José Baeza-Rivera
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-05-20

6.  Dimming the "Halo" Around Monogamy: Re-assessing Stigma Surrounding Consensually Non-monogamous Romantic Relationships as a Function of Personal Relationship Orientation.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; Erin J Shumlich; Taylor Kohut; Lorne Campbell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.